Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies
- 376 Downloads
Modified Barium Swallow Studies (MBSSs) are a fluoroscopic exam that exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Even though radiation exposure from MBSSs is relatively small, it is necessary to understand the excess cancer risk to the patient, in order to ensure a high benefit-to-risk ratio from the exam. This investigation was aimed at estimating the excess radiation risks during MBSSs. We examined 53 adult MBSSs performed using the full Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) protocol. For each exam, the radiation dose (in terms of dose area product), patient age, and sex was recorded. Using published methodology, we determined the effective dose and organ specific dose then used BEIR VII data to calculate the excess cancer incidence related to radiation exposure from MBSSs in adults. Excess cancer incidence risks due to MBSSs were 11 per million exposed patients for 20-year-old males, 32 per million exposed patients for 20-year-old females, 4.9 per million exposed patients for 60-year-old males, and 7.2 per million exposed patients for 60-year-old females. Radiation exposure to the thyroid, lung, and red bone marrow contributed over 90% of the total cancer incidence risk. For the 20-year-old males, the excess cancer incidence risk is 4.7%/Sv, which is reduced to 1.0%/Sv in the 80-year-olds. For the 20-year-old females, the excess cancer incidence risk is 14%/Sv, which is reduced to 1.3%/Sv for 80-year-olds. Overall, the risk per unit effective dose from MBSSs is lower than the risk estimates for uniform whole-body irradiation. Patient age is the most important determinant of patient cancer risk from MBSSs.
KeywordsDeglutition disorders Fluoroscopy Radiation exposure Cancer risks
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The research study protocol was reviewed by our IRB who deemed that informed consent should be waived as MBSSs were standard of care and de-identified prior to research use.
- 1.Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) in acute-care stroke patients. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999;8:1–6.Google Scholar
- 11.ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332.Google Scholar
- 12.ICRP. Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(6):2.Google Scholar
- 17.Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, Balter S, Dixon R, Padovani R, Schueler B, Cardella JF, De Baère T. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:230–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.National Research Council of the National Academies. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2006. p. 245.Google Scholar
- 19.Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) & American College of Radiology. Patient safety—radiation dose in X-ray and CT exams. https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray.
- 20.Tapiovaara M, Siiskonen T. PCXMC. A montecarlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examination. STUK-A231. 2nd ed. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety; 2008.Google Scholar