Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume: Association with Short- and Long-Term Feeding Tube Use in Head and Neck IMRT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of head and neck primary tumors may be a significant prognostic factor for feeding tube (FT) use and FT dependence. Seventy-nine patients with evaluable primary tumors, pre-therapy FDG-PET scans, treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (± concurrent chemotherapy) for head and neck mucosal cancers were included. MTV was quantified and recorded for the primary lesion using a minimum standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold of 2.0. Patients were recommended prophylactic FT and followed up by a dietician for at least eight weeks of post-radiotherapy. Associations between MTV, dose to swallowing organs at risk, FT use, and FT dependence were analyzed. MTV was positively correlated with gross tumor volume (GTV) (r = 0.7357; p < 0.0001). MTVs larger than 17 cc were associated with higher rates of FT use (87.8% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.0067) and FT dependence at six weeks (76.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.0024) and six months (25.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.0088). Increasing MTV was associated with increasing mean dose to the oral cavity (p = < 0.0001), tongue base (p = 0.0009), and superior (SPCM) (p = 0.0001) and middle pharyngeal constrictor muscles (MPCM) (p = 0.0005). Increasing MTV was associated with increasing maximum dose to oral cavity (p = 0.0028), tongue base (p = 0.0056), SPCM (p = 0.0037), and MPCM (p = 0.0085). Pre-treatment MTV is a reproducible parameter that can be generated at or prior to a pre-treatment Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and may expedite decisions regarding placement of prophylactic FTs. Prospective evaluation in larger series is required to determine whether MTV is a more useful prognostic variable for FT use than clinical T-classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Luis DA, Izaola O, Aller R. Nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007;11:239–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ng K, Leung SF, Johnson PJ, et al. Nutritional consequences of radiotherapy in nasopharynx cancer patients. Nutr Cancer. 2004;49:156–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silver HJ, Dietrich MS, Murphy BA. Changes in body mass, energy balance, physical function, and inflammatory state in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation after low-dose induction chemotherapy. Head Neck. 2007;29:893–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Wayenburg CA, Rasmussen-Conrad EL, van den Berg MG, et al. Weight loss in head and neck cancer patients little noticed in general practice. J Prim Health Care. 2010;2:16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisbruch A, Levendag PC, Feng FY, et al. Can IMRT or brachytherapy reduce dysphagia associated with chemoradiotherapy of head and neck cancer? The Michigan and Rotterdam experiences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:S40–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ang KK, Harris J, Garden AS, et al. Concomitant boost radiation plus concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 99-14. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3008–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beckmann GK, Hoppe F, Pfreundner L, et al. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in combination with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2005;27:36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourhis J, Sire C, Graff P, et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99-02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:145–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Driessen CM, Janssens GO, van der Graaf WT, et al. Toxicity and efficacy of accelerated radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck carcinoma. Head Neck. 2015;38(S1):E559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ho KF, Swindell R, Brammer CV. Dose intensity comparison between weekly and 3-weekly Cisplatin delivered concurrently with radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparison from New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:1513–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bossola M. Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2015;7:265–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Koyfman SA, Adelstein DJ. Enteral feeding tubes in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a critical review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:581–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Corry J, Poon W, McPhee N, et al. Prospective study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing (chemo)radiation. Head Neck. 2009;31:867–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant DG, Bradley PT, Pothier DD, et al. Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34:103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carnaby-Mann G, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, et al. “Pharyngocise”: randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:210–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frowen J, Cotton S, Corry J, et al. Impact of demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment factors on swallowing after (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2010;32:513–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poulsen MG, Riddle B, Keller J, et al. Predictors of acute grade 4 swallowing toxicity in patients with stages III and IV squamous carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87:253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eisbruch A, Schwartz M, Rasch C, et al. Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1425–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhayani MK, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA, et al. Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: factors affecting placement and dependence. Head Neck. 2013;35:1634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng SS, Terrell JE, Bradford CR, et al. Variables associated with feeding tube placement in head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Machtay M, Moughan J, Trotti A, et al. Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3582–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wopken K, Bijl HP, van der Schaaf A, et al. Development of a multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for tube feeding dependence after curative radiotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Caldas-Magalhaes J, Kasperts N, Kooij N, et al. Validation of imaging with pathology in laryngeal cancer: accuracy of the registration methodology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:e289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stokkel MP, Terhaard CH, Hordijk GJ, et al. The detection of unknown primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases by dual-head positron emission tomography. Oral Oncol. 1999;35:390–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose improves staging and patient management in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1190–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moeller BJ, Rana V, Cannon BA, et al. Prospective risk-adjusted [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessment of radiation response in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2509–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dibble EH, Alvarez AC, Truong MT, et al. 18F-FDG metabolic tumor volume and total glycolytic activity of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: adding value to clinical staging. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:709–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim JW, Oh JS, Roh JL, et al. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1353–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roh JL, Kim JS, Kang BC, et al. Clinical significance of pretreatment metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:869–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mallick I, Gupta SK, Ray R, et al. Predictors of weight loss during conformal radiotherapy for head and neck cancers—how important are planning target volumes? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013;25:557–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Christianen ME, Langendijk JA, Westerlaan HE, et al. Delineation of organs at risk involved in swallowing for radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 2011;101:394–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gregoire V, Ang K, Budach W, et al. Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:172–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee P, Bazan JG, Lavori PW, et al. Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012;13:52–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Christianen ME, Schilstra C, Beetz I, et al. Predictive modelling for swallowing dysfunction after primary (chemo)radiation: results of a prospective observational study. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Eisbruch A, Kim HM, Feng FY, et al. Chemo-IMRT of oropharyngeal cancer aiming to reduce dysphagia: swallowing organs late complication probabilities and dosimetric correlates. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e93–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pow EH, Kwong DL, McMillan AS, et al. Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:981–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schinagl DA, Vogel WV, Hoffmann AL, et al. Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:1282–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Goldenberg D, Begum S, Westra WH, et al. Cystic lymph node metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer: an HPV-associated phenomenon. Head Neck. 2008;30:898–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Trotti A, Bellm LA, Epstein JB, et al. Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic literature review. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66:253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Trotti A, Pajak TF, Gwede CK, et al. TAME: development of a new method for summarising adverse events of cancer treatment by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:613–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang W, McNutt TR, Dudley SA, et al. Predictive factors for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement and use in head and neck patients following intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment: concordance, discrepancies, and the role of gabapentin. Dysphagia. 2016;31:206–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goepfert RP, Fuller CD, Gunn GB, et al. Symptom burden as a driver of decisional regret in long-term oropharyngeal carcinoma survivors. Head Neck. 2017;39:2151–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Departments of Nutrition and Dietetics & Speech Pathology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Jackson MBBS, FRANZCR.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We state that, regarding this paper, no actual or potential conflicts of interest exist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, J.E., Anderson, N.J., Rolfo, M. et al. 18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume: Association with Short- and Long-Term Feeding Tube Use in Head and Neck IMRT. Dysphagia 34, 341–349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9946-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9946-z

Keywords

Navigation