Dysphagia

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 337–344 | Cite as

Tongue-Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: Specificity of Bulb Position and Detraining Effects

  • Leen Van den Steen
  • Charlotte Schellen
  • Katja Verstraelen
  • Anne-Sophie Beeckman
  • Jan Vanderwegen
  • Marc De Bodt
  • Gwen Van Nuffelen
Original Article

Abstract

Clinical tongue-strengthening therapy programs are generally based on the principles of exercise and motor learning, including the specificity paradigm. The aim of this study was to investigate the specific effect of anterior and posterior tongue-strengthening exercises (TSE) on tongue strength (TS) in healthy older adults and to measure possible detraining effects. Sixteen healthy elderly completed 8 weeks of TSE by means of the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). They were distributed in two different treatment arms and performed either exclusively anterior or posterior TSE (ATSE, n = 9 or PTSE, n = 7) depending on the treatment arm. Anterior and posterior maximal isometric pressures (MIPA, MIPP) were measured at baseline, halfway, and after completion of the training sessions. Detraining was measured by repeating MIPA and MIPP measures 4 weeks after the last session of TSE. MIPA and MIPP increased significantly in both treatment arms. MIPA was significantly higher in the ATSE group compared to the PTSE group across all measures in time. No significant differences were observed in MIPP between the ATSE and PTSE groups. Regardless of treatment arm, there was no significant detraining effect measured 4 weeks after the last TSE session. This study suggests that TSE show partial specificity concerning bulb position. We conclude that especially anterior training results in higher anterior TS in comparison with posterior exercises. Furthermore, we found no detraining effects, independent of bulb location.

Keywords

Dysphagia Tongue-strengthening exercises Specificity Bulb location 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Antwerp University Hospital (B300201421549). All subjects agreed voluntarily to participate in this study and signed an informed consent.

References

  1. 1.
    De Bodt M, Guns C, D’Hondt M, Vanderwegen J, Van Nuffelen G. Dysfagie. Handboek voor de klinische praktijk. Antwerp: Garant; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butler SG, Stuart A, Leng X, Wilhelm E, Rees C, Williamson J, Kritchevsky SB. The relationship of aspiration status with tongue and handgrip strength in healthy older adults. J Gerontol Ser A. 2011;66:452–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ono T, Kumakura I, Arimoto M, Hori K, Dong J, Iwata H, Nokubi T, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y. Influence of bite force and tongue pressure on oro-pharyngeal residue in the elderly. Gerontology. 2007;24:143–50.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burkhead LM, Sapienza CM, Rosenbek JC. Strength-training exercise in dysphagia rehabilitation: principles, procedures, and directions for future research. Dysphagia. 2007;22:251–65. doi: 10.1007/s00455-006-9074-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sanders I, Mu L. A 3-dimensional atlas of the human tongue muscles. Anat Rec. 2013;296:1102–14. doi: 10.1002/ar.22711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilbert RJ, Napadow VJ, Gaige TA, Wedeen VJ. Anatomical basis of lingual hydrostatic deformation. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:4069–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kier WM, Smith KK. Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zool J Linn Soc. 1985;83:307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Felton SM, Gaige TA, Reese TG, Wedeen VJ, Gilbert RJ. Mechanical basis for lingual deformation during the propulsive phase of swallowing as determined by phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103:255–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sale D. Specificity of training of training. Can J Sports Sci. 1992;17:71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Nuffelen G, Van den Steen L, Vanderveken O, Specenier P, Van Laer C, Van Rompaey D, Guns C, Mariën S, Peeters M, Van de Heyning P, Vanderwegen J, De Bodt M. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: tongue strengthening exercises in head and neck cancer patients, does exercise load matter? Trials. 2015;16:395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0889-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kletzien H, Russell JA, Leverson GE, Connor NP. Differential effects of targeted tongue exercise and treadmill running on aging tongue muscle structure and contractile properties. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114:472–81. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01370.2012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazarus C, Logemann JA, Huang CF, Rademaker W. Effects of two types of tongue strengthening exercises in young normals. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003;55:199–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark HM. Specificity of training in the lingual musculature. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:657–76. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0045).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hori K, Taniguchi H, Hayashi H, Magara J, Minagi Y, Li Q, Ono T, Inoue M. Role of tongue pressure production in oropharyngeal swallow biomechanics. Physiol Rep. 2013;. doi: 10.1002/phy2.167.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steele CM, Van Lieshout P. Tongue movements during water swallowing in healthy young and older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52:1255–67. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0131).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Napadow VJ, Chen Q, Wedeen VJ, Gilbert RJ. Intramural mechanics of the human tongue in association with physiological deformations. J Biomech. 1999;32:1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chi-Fishman G, Stone M, Mc Call GN. Lingual action in normal sequential swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:771–85. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4104.771.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tasko SM, Kent RD, Westbury JR. Variability in tongue movement kinematics during normal liquid swallowing. Dysphagia. 2002;17:126–38. doi: 10.1007/s00455-001-0112-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson EM, Green JR. Coordinative organization of lingual propulsion during the normal adult swallow. Dysphagia. 2006;21:226–36. doi: 10.1007/s00455-006-9053-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stierwalt JA, Youmans SR. Tongue measures in individuals with normal and impaired swallowing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;16(2):144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clark HM, Henson PA, Barber WD, Stierwalt JA, Sherrill M. Relationships among subjective and objective measures of tongue strength and oral phase swallowing impairments. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;12:40–50. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/051).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robbins J, Levine R, Wood J, Roecker EB, Luschei E. Age effects on lingual pressure generation as a risk factor for dysphagia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(5):257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida M, Kikutani T, Tsuga K, Utanohara Y, Hayashi R, Akagawa Y. Decreased tongue pressure reflects symptom of dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2006;21:61–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palmer PM, Jaffe DM, McCulloch TM, Finnegan EM, Van Daele DJ, Luschei ES. Quantitative contributions of the muscles of the tongue, floor-of-mouth, jaw, and velum to tongue-to-palate pressure generation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:828–35. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/060).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clark HM, O’Brien K, Calleja A, Corrie SN. Effects of directional exercise on lingual strength. J Speech Lang Hear Re. 2009;52:1034–47. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0062).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robbins J, Gangnon RE, Theis SM, Kays SA, Hewitt AL, Hind JA. The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1483–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53467.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robbins J, Kays SA, Gangnon RE, Hind JA, Hewitt AL, Gentry LR, Taylor AJ. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:150–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yeates EM, Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Improvements in tongue strength and pressure-generation precision following a tongue-pressure training protocol in older individuals with dysphagia: three case reports. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3:735–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lazarus CL, Husaini H, Falciglia D, DeLacure M, Branski RC, Kraus D, Lee N, Ho M, Ganz C, Smith B, Sanfilippo N. Effects of exercise on swallowing and tongue strength in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:523–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steele CM, Bailey GL, Polacco RE, Hori SF, Molfenter SM, Oshalla M, Yeates EM. Outcomes of tongue-pressure strength and accuracy training for dysphagia following acquired brain injury. Int J Speech Lang Patholog. 2013;15:492–502. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.752864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oh JC. Effects of tongue strength training and detraining on tongue pressures in healthy adults. Dysphagia. 2015;30:315–20. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9601-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park JS, Kim HJ, Oh DJ. Effect of tongue strength training using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument in stroke patients with dysphagia. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:3631–2. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3631.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Steele CM, Bayley MT, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Nagy A, Namasivayam AM, Stokely SL, Wolkin T. A randomized trial comparing two tongue pressure resistance training protocols for post-stroke dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2016;31:452–61. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9699-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rogus-Pulia N, Rusche N, Hind JA, Zielinski J, Gangnon R, Safdar N, Robbins J. Effects of device-facilitated isometric progressive resistance oropharyngeal therapy on swallowing and health-related outcomes in older adults with dysphagia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:417–24. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13933.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vanderwegen J, Guns C, Van Nuffelen G, Elen R, De Bodt M. The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy Belgian adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28:159–66. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9425-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Suiter DM, Sloggy J, Leder SB. Validation of the Yale Swallow Protocol: a prospective double-blinded videofluoroscopic study. Dysphagia. 2014;29:199–203. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9488-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hiraoka A, Yoshikawa M, Nakamori M, Hosomi N, Nagasaki T, Mori T, Oda M, Maruyama H, Yoshida M, Izumi Y, Matsumoto M, Tsuga K. Maximum tongue pressure is associated with swallowing dysfunction in ALS patients. Dysphagia. 2017;. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9797-z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    O’Day C, Frank E, Montgomery A, Nichols M, McDade H. Repeated tongue and hand strength measurements in normal adults and individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Int J Orofac Myol. 2005;31:15–25.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murdoch BE, Spencer TJ, Theodoros DG, Thompson EC. Lip and tongue function in multiple sclerosis: a physiological analysis. Mot Control. 1998;2(2):148–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lazarus CL, Husaini H, Hu K, Culliney B, Li Z, Urken M, Jacobson A, Persky M, Tran T, Concert C, Palacios D, Metcalfe-Klax R, Kumar M, Bennett B, Harrison L. Functional outcomes and quality of life after chemoradiotherapy: baseline and 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Dysphagia. 2014;29(3):365–75. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9519-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schoenfeld BJ, Ratamess NA, Peterson MD, Contreras B, Tiryaki-Sonmez G. Influence of resistance training frequency on muscular adaptations in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(7):1821–9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000970.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fernández-Lezaun E, Schumann M, Mäkinen T, Kyröläinen H, Walker S. Effects of resistance training frequency on cardiorespiratory fitness in older men and women during intervention and follow-up. Exp Gerontol. 2017;95:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.05.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Van den Steen L, Vanderveken O, Vanderwegen J, Van Gestel D, Daisne JF, Allouche J, Delacroix L, Van Rompaey D, Beauvois S, Cvilic S, Mariën S, Desuter G, Vermorken JB, Van den Weyngaert D, Specenier P, Van Laer C, Peeters M, Van de Heyning P, Chantrain G, Lawson G, Lazarus C, De Bodt M, Van Nuffelen G. Feasibility of tongue strength measurements during (chemo)radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2017;. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3761-1.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Langmore SE, Pisegna JM. Efficacy of exercises to rehabilitate dysphagia: a critique of the literature. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:222–9. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ivey FM, Tracy BL, Lemmer JT, NessAiver M, Metter J, Fozard JL, Hurley BF. Effects of strength training and detraining on muscle quality: age and gender comparison. J Gerontol. 2000;55:152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Toraman NF. Short term and long term detraining: is there any difference between young-old and old people? Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:561–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery – Rehabilitation Center for Communication DisordersAntwerp University HospitalAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.University College ArteveldehogeschoolGhentBelgium
  4. 4.University College Thomas MoreAntwerpBelgium
  5. 5.CHU Saint-PierreBrusselsBelgium
  6. 6.Faculty of Speech, Pathology and AudiologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations