Abstract
The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the 44-item SWAL-QoL into Greek and examine its internal consistency, test–retest reliability, external construct validity, and discriminant validity in order to provide a validated dysphagia-specific QoL instrument in the Greek language. The instrument was translated into Greek using the back translation to ensure linguistic validity and was culturally adapted resulting in the SWAL-QoL-GR. Two groups of participants were included: a patient group of 86 adults (48 males; age range: 18–87 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia, and an age-matched healthy control group (39 adults; 19 males; age range: 18–84 years). The Greek 30-item version of the WHOQOL-BREF was used for assessment of construct validity. Overall, the questionnaire achieved good to excellent psychometric values. Internal consistency of all 10 subscales and the physical symptoms scale of the SWAL-QoL-GR assessed by Cronbach’s α was good to excellent (0.811 < α < 0.940). Test–retest validity was found to be good to excellent as well. In addition, moderate to strong correlations were found between seven of the ten subscales of the SWAL-QoL-GR with limited items of the WHOQΟL-BREF (0.401 < ρ < 0.65), supporting good construct validity of the SWAL-QoL-GR. The SWAL-QoL-GR also correctly differentiated between patients with dysphagia and age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001) on all 11 scales, further indicating excellent discriminant validity. Finally, no significant differences were found between the two sexes. This cultural adaptation and validation allows the use of this tool in Greece, further enhancing our clinical and scientific efforts to increase the evidence-based practice resources for dysphagia rehabilitation in Greece.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chow L, Siu E, Kong H, et al. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among elderly Chinese private nursing home residents in Hong Kong. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2004;19:734–40. doi:10.1002/gps.1158.
Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, et al. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17:139–46. doi:10.1007/s00455-001-0113-5.
Eslick GD, Talley NJ. Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life—a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:971–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03664.x.
Farri A, Accornero A, Burdese C. Social importance of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and therapy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:83–6.
Gillespie MB, Brodsky MB, Day TA, et al. Swallowing-related quality of life after head and neck cancer treatment. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1362–7. doi:10.1097/00005537-200408000-00008.
Nguyen NP, Frank C, Moltz CC, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:772–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.017.
Plowman-Prine EK, Sapienza CM, Okun MS, et al. The relationship between quality of life and swallowing in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1352–8. doi:10.1002/mds.22617.
Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:137–44. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.86879.
Chin R, Lee BY. Economics and patient reported outcomes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 145–66.
McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15:115–21. doi:10.1007/s004550010012.
McHorney CCA, Bricker DE, Robbins JJ, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagiain adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15:122–33. doi:10.1007/s004550010013.
McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, et al. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114. doi:10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1.
Costa Bandeira AK, Azevedo EHM, Vartanian JG, et al. Quality of life related to swallowing after tongue cancer treatment. Dysphagia. 2008;23:183–92. doi:10.1007/s00455-007-9124-1.
Greenblatt DY, Sippel R, Leverson G, et al. Thyroid resection improves perception of swallowing function in patients with thyroid disease. World J Surg. 2009;33:255–60. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9837-9.
Pyn Leow L, Huckabee ML, Anderson T, Beckert L. The impact of dysphagia on quality of life in ageing and Parkinson’s disease as measured by the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QoL) questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2010;25:216–20. doi:10.1007/s00455-009-9245-9.
Paris G, Martinaud O, Petit A, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis alters quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:199–204. doi:10.1111/joor.12019.
Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, et al. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol; 2009. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.003.
Robbins J, Kays SA, Gangnon RE, et al. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:150–8. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.002.
Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, et al. Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2010;75:1912–9. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fef115.
Webster KT, Samlan RA, Jones B, et al. Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: swallowing, voice, and speech outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119:10–6. doi:10.1177/000348941011900102.
Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27:325–35. doi:10.1007/s00455-011-9369-6.
Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin É. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:167–71. doi:10.1016/j.gcb.2008.12.012.
Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24:66–70. doi:10.1007/s00455-008-9174-z.
Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the swallow quality-of-life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26:117–24. doi:10.1007/s00455-010-9272-6.
Montoni NP, Horta IA, Bandeira AKC, Angelis EC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the SWAL-QOL and Swal-Care Questionnaires into Brazilian Portuguese. Appl Cancer Res. 2009;29:129–34.
Kim S, Cha Y. Reliability and validity of Korean version of the SWAL-QOL. J Korea Acad. 2014;15:2981–8. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2981.
Antunes EB, Vieira D, Dinis-ribeiro M. Linguistic and cultural adaptation into European Portuguese of SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Arq Med. 2015;29:6–10.
Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31:626–34. doi:10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z.
Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the swallow quality of life questionnaire. Türk Fiz ve Rehabil Derg. 2016;27:19–29. doi:10.21653/tfrd.271061.
Okalidou A, Kampanaros M. Teacher perceptions of communication impairment at screening stage in preschool children living in Patras, Greece. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001;36:489–502. doi:10.1080/13682820110089399.
Malandraki G, Markaki V, Georgopoulos VC, et al. An international pilot study of asynchronous teleconsultation for oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:75–9. doi:10.1177/1357633X12474963.
CPLOL—Prevention Commission (2005) Dysphagia Review 2004–2005. http://www.cplol.eu/images/Documents/prof_pract/CPLOL_dysphagiareport_en.pdf.
Malandraki G, Markaki V, Georgopoulos V. Postextubation dysphagia in critical patients: a first report from the largest step-down intensive care unit in Greece. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2016;25:150–6. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0069.
Fountoulakis KN, Tsolaki M, Chantzi H, Kazis A. Mini mental state examination (MMSE): a validation study in Greece. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2000;15:342–5. doi:10.1177/153331750001500604.
McHorney CA, Martin-Harris B, Robbins J, Rosenbek J. Clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcome tools with respect to bolus flow measures. Dysphagia. 2006;21:141–8. doi:10.1007/s00455-005-0026-9.
Rosenbek JC, Jones HN. Dysphagia in movement disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2008.
Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 3–18. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_1.
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Heal. 2005;8:94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–85. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
Ginieri-Coccossis M, Triantafillou E, Tomaras V, et al. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF in clinical and health Greek populations: incorporating new culture-relevant items. Psychiatrike. 2011;23:130–42.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874.
George D, Mallery M. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
Hahn EA, Cella D, Chassany O, et al. Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1244–54. doi:10.4065/82.10.1244.
Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the contributors to the translation and back translation of the questionnaire and all the study participants and the clinicians and centers/hospitals who referred patients. We also thank the original developers of the SWAL-QoL, especially Dr. McHorney, for the permission to translate and adapt the original SWAL-QoL into our language. Finally, we acknowledge the authors of the Greek version of the WHOQOL-BREF, especially Dr. Ginieri-Coccossis, for permission of its use in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Georgopoulos, V.C., Perdikogianni, M., Mouskenteri, M. et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek. Dysphagia 33, 91–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8