, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 721–729 | Cite as

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified Evan’s Blue Dye Test in Detecting Aspiration in Patients with Tracheostomy: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

  • Sibylle BéchetEmail author
  • Fiona Hill
  • Órla Gilheaney
  • Margaret Walshe
Review Article


Oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) is a common occurrence in patients with tracheostomy. The modified Evan’s blue dye test (MEBDT) is an easily administered bedside procedure for the assessment of tracheostomised patients. However, studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the MEBDT reach conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to determine the overall accuracy of the MEBDT in detecting OPA in adults with tracheostomy. The search strategy incorporated searching electronic databases, checking reference lists and citations and retrieving unpublished data. Data of primary studies were extracted and examined by three independent reviewers. The assessment of the methodological quality of included studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Six studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The studies presented significant disparities in study design and patient characteristics. Furthermore, high discrepancies in the administration of MEBDT across studies were noted. Therefore, a meta-analysis was not considered appropriate. Sensitivity estimates varied widely across the studies (38–95 %), indicating that the MEBDT is unreliable in detecting OPA. However, the studies emerge with overall high specificity values, ranging from 79 to 100 %. This true negative rate suggests that the MEBDT correctly identifies patients without OPA. This review highlights the need for further research studies assessing the accuracy of the MEBDT in detecting aspiration in patients with tracheostomy, using a standardised and reliable procedure. Outcomes from such studies will update the current level of evidence in relation to the MEBDT and consequently define best clinical practice.


Deglutition disorders Oropharyngeal aspiration Modified Evan’s blue dye test Diagnostic accuracy Tracheostomy 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

There are no relevant disclosures or conflict of interest to declare for the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    Duann CW, Hsieh MS, Chen PT, Chou HP, Huang CS. Successful percutaneous tracheostomy via puncture through the thyroid isthmus. Respirol Case Rep. 2004;2:57–60. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.48.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kluge S, Baumann HJ, Maier C, et al. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a nationwide survey. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1639–43. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318188b818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K, Collaborators TracMan. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the tracman randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:2121–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baskin JZ, Panagopoulos G, Parks C, Rothstein S, Komisar A. Clinical outcomes for the elderly patient receiving a tracheotomy. Head Neck. 2004;26:71–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durbin CG. Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care. 2010;55:1056–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garuti G, Reverberi C, Briganti A, Massobrio M, Lombardi F, Lusuardi M. Swallowing disorders in tracheostomised patients: a multidisciplinary/multiprofessional approach in decannulation protocols. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014;9:1–10. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-9-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung SJ, Kim DY, Kim YW, Koh YW, Joo SY, Kim ES. Effect of decannulation on pharyngeal and laryngeal movement in post-stroke tracheostomized patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012;36:356–64. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.3.356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peruzzi WT, Logemann JA, Currie D, Moen SG. Assessment of aspiration in patients with tracheostomies: comparison of the bedside colored dye assessment with videofluoroscopic examination. Respir Care. 2001;46:243–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh S, Hamdy S. Dysphagia in stroke patients. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:383–91. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.043281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie. Neurogene Dysphagien. In: Diener H-C, Weimar C, editors. Leitlinien für diagnostik und therapie in der neurologie. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NHS Health Scotland. Caring for the patient with a tracheostomy: best practice statement. Scotland: NHS quality improvement. 2007.
  12. 12.
    Downes LS. Clinical consistency among speech and language therapists in the management of tracheostomies in the Republic of Ireland. Dublin: Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin; 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson-Henry S, Braddock B. The modified Evan’s blue dye procedure fails to detect aspiration in the tracheostomized patient: five case reports. Dysphagia. 1005;10:172–4. doi: 10.1007/BF00260973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brady S, Donzelli J. The modified barium swallow and the functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46:1009–22. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee W-S, Lee S-H, Park YH, et al. Effectiveness of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in patients with swallowing disorders: a systematic review. Brain Neurorehabil. 2008;6:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Vet HCW, Eisinga A, Riphagen I, Aertgeertes B, Pewsner D. Chapter 7: Searching for studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 0.4. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman GD, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bossuyt MMP, Reitsma BJ, Bruns ED, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1–6. doi: 10.1373/49.1.1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whiting P, Rutjes WSA, Reitsma BJ, Bossuyt MMP, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;10(3):25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whiting P, Rutjes WSA, Westwood EM, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Review Manager (RevMan) (computer program) Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Neill-Pirozzi MT, Lisiecki JD, Momose KJ, Connors JJ, Milliner PM. Simultaneous modified barium swallow and blue dye tests: a determination of the accuracy of blue dye test aspiration findings. Dysphagia. 2003;18:32–8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-002-0081-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brady LS, Krieger R, Wesling M, Scott K, Donzelli J, Pietrantoni M. Sensitivity of the blue dye food test for detecting aspiration in patients with a tracheotomy. BJAST. 2015;7:429–35. doi: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/11652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Donzelli J, Brady LS, Wesling M, Craney M. Simultaneous modified Evans blue dye procedure and video nasal endoscopic evaluation of the swallow. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1746–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winklmaier U, Wüst K, Plinkert PK, Wallner F. The accuracy of the modified Evans blue dye test in detecting aspiration in head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:1059–64. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0299-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Acheson D (2003) Reports of blue doscoloration and death in patients receiving enteral feedings tinted with the dye FD&C blue no. 1. FDA Public Health Advisory. Accessed 27 May 2015.
  27. 27.
    Kleijnen J, Westwood M, Whiting P. Applicability of diagnostic studies: statistics, bias and estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes. 2011;105:498–503. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naaktgeboren AC, de Groot J, van Smeden M, Moons K, Reitsma BJ. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:195–202. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282:1061–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PM. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ. 2006;174:469–76. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050090.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Speech and Language StudiesTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Department of Speech and Language TherapyTallaght HospitalDublin 22Ireland

Personalised recommendations