Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence and Predictive Features of Pharyngeal Pouch in a Dysphagic Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pharyngeal pouch patients often present with dysphagia and risk perforation when undergoing gastroscopy. Knowledge of pharyngeal pouch incidence and predictive demographic features in patients referred for dysphagia would help determine those patients who should have barium swallow as an initial investigation. The prospectively collected data of 2,797 consecutive referrals were analysed. Logistic regression determined significant variables for predicting pharyngeal pouches. Of the 2,430 patients investigated [mean age = 67.7 years, range 17–103; 48.2 % male], 49 (2.0 %) had a pharyngeal pouch [mean age = 79.8 years (range 58–93); 53.1 % male]. Significant predictors of pharyngeal pouch were pharyngeal level dysphagia (odds ratio [OR] 3.8–19.2), age over 65 years (OR 2.2–14.1), symptom duration over 12 weeks (OR 1.1–3.9), and no weight loss (OR 1.1–5.5). Only 18 patients (36.7 %) underwent surgery for their pouch. Midsternal dysphagia alone occurred in 16 % of all patients with pouches. From our results we conclude that pharyngeal pouches in a dysphagic population are more common than previously recognised. Patients aged over 65 years with pharyngeal level dysphagia for more than 12 weeks should have a barium swallow as their initial investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siddiq MA, Sood S, Strachan D. Pharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s diverticulum). Postgrad Med J. 2001;77:506–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferreira LE, Simmons DT, Baron TH. Zenker’s diverticula: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and flexible endoscopic management. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spechler SJ. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on treatment of patients with dysphagia caused by benign disorders of the distal esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:229–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates G. Pharyngeal Pouch. In: Gleeson M, editor. Scott Brown’s textbook of otorhinolaryngology. 7th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2009. p. 2044–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray IA, Palmer J, Waters C, Dalton HR. Predictive value of symptoms and demographics in diagnosing malignancy or peptic stricture. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:4357–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Melleney EM, Subhani JM, Willoughby CP. Dysphagia referrals to a district general hospital gastroenterology unit: hard to swallow. Dysphagia. 2004;19:78–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furuta GT. Eosinophilic esophagitis: update on clinicopathological manifestations and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27:383–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Esfandyari T, Potter JW, Vaezi MF. Dysphagia: a cost analysis of the diagnostic approach. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2733–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell JD, Farrow R, Hussaini SH, Dalton HR. Clearance of barium from the oesophagus with diet cola and metoclopramide: a one stop approach to patients with dysphagia. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:64–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhatigan E, Tyrmpas I, Murray G, Plevris JN. Scoring system to identify patients at high risk of oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1831–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaninotto G, Narne S, Costantini M, Molena D, Cutrone C, Portale G, Costantino M, Rizzetto C, Basili U, Ancona E. Tailored approach to Zenker’s diverticula. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richtsmeier WJ. Myotomy length determinants in endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for small Zenker’s diverticula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114:341–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leong SC, Wilkie MD, Webb CJ. Endoscopic stapling of Zenker’s diverticulum: establishing national guidelines for auditing clinical outcomes in the United Kingdom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:1877–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Casso C, Lalam M, Ghosh S, Timms M. Endoscopic stapling diverticulum: an audit of difficulties, outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Otolaryngology. 2006;134:288–93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jaramillo MJ, McLay KA, McAteer D. Long-term clinico-radiological assessment of endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouch: a series of cases. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:462–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowdler DA, Stell PM. Carcinoma arising in posterior pharyngeal pulsion diverticulum (Zenker’s diverticulum). Br J Surg. 1987;74:561–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner MJ. Carcinoma as a complication of pharyngeal pouch. Br J Radiol. 1963;36:206–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain Alexander Murray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, I.A., Grimes, D.R., Wilde, A.D. et al. Incidence and Predictive Features of Pharyngeal Pouch in a Dysphagic Population. Dysphagia 29, 305–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9507-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9507-4

Keywords

Navigation