Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Low-Osmolar Water-Soluble Contrast in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Exams

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The selection of the contrast agent used during fluoroscopic exams is an important clinical decision. The purpose of this article is to document the usage of a nonionic, water-soluble contrast (iohexol) and barium contrast in adult patients undergoing fluoroscopic exams of the pharynx and/or esophagus and provide clinical indications for the use of each. For 1 year, data were collected on the use of iohexol and barium during fluoroscopic exams. The contrast agent used was selected by the speech language pathologist (SLP) or the radiologist based on the exam’s indications. A total of 1,978 fluoroscopic exams were completed in the 12-month period of documentation. Of these exams, 60.6 % were completed for medical reasons and 39.4 % for surgical reasons. Fifty-five percent of the exams were performed jointly by a SLP and a radiologist and 45 % were performed by a radiologist alone. Aspiration was present in 22 % of the exams, vestibular penetration occurred in 38 %, extraluminal leakage of contrast was observed in 4.6 %, and both aspiration and leakage were seen in 1 % of the exams. In cases with aspiration, iohexol was used alone in 8 %, iohexol and barium were both used in 45 %, and barium was used alone in 47 %. In cases with extraluminal leakage, iohexol was used alone in 58 %, iohexol and barium were both used in 31 %, and barium was used alone in 11 %. No adverse effects were seen with the use of iohexol. When barium was used in cases of aspiration and extraluminal leakage, the amount of aspirated barium was small and the extraluminal barium in the instances of leakage was small. Iohexol is a useful screening contrast agent and can safely provide information, and its use reduces the risk of aspiration and the chance of leakage of large amounts of barium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lareau DG, Berta JW. Fatal aspiration of thick barium. Radiology. 1976;120(2):317.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McAlister WH, Segal MJ. Fatal aspirations in infancy during gastrointestinal series. Pediatr Radiol. 1984;14:81–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tamm I, Kortsik C. Severe barium aspiration into the lung: clinical presentation, prognosis and therapy. Int Rev Thorac Dis. 1999;66:81–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsokos M, Schultz F, Vogel H. Barium aspiration with fatal outcome. Aktuelle Radiol. 1998;8:2001–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Volomdaki E, Ergazakis N, Gourtsagianni N. Late changes in barium sulfate aspiration, HRCT features. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2226–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buecker A, Wein BB, Nuernberg JM, Guenther RW. Esophageal perforation: comparison of use of aqueous and barium-containing contrast media. Radiology. 1997;202:683–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Foley MJ, Ghahremani GG, Rogers LF. Reappraisal of contrast media used to detect upper gastrointestinal perforations: comparison of ionic, water-soluble media with barium sulfate. Radiology. 1982;144:231–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginai AZ, TenKate FJW, TenBerg RGM, Hoornstra J. Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the upper gastrointestinal tract in case of a suspected leakage: effects on the mediastinum. Br J Radiol. 1985;59(691):585–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginai AZ, TenKate FJW, TenBerg RGM, Hoornstra K. Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage: effect on lungs. Br J Radiol. 1984;57:895–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips LG Jr, Cunningham J. Esophageal perforation. Radiol Clin N Am. 1984;22(3):607–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ginai AZ. Barium sulfate versus water-soluble low osmolar contrast medium in esophageal examinations [Letter to the Editor]. Radiology. 1997;205(1):287–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davenport D, Cohen MD, Hanna M, Bugaieski E, Heifetz SA. Studies of iohexol in the rabbit lung and peritoneum. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:724–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Radiology Manual on Contrast Media, ver. 8. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2012.

  14. Ginai AZ, Babberman A, Zondervan PE, Van Leeuwen W, Morcos SK. The histologic response of the lungs of rats to potentially suitable water soluble bronchographic contrast agents Iotrolan, a nonionic dimer, and Iopamidol, a nonionic monomer. Br J Radiol. 1993;66:773–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Belt T, Cohen MD. Metrizamide evaluation of the esophagus in infants. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143:367–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen M, Smith WL, Smith JA, Gresham EL, Schreiner R, Lemons J. The use of Metrizamide to visual the gastrointestinal tract in children: a preliminary report. Clin Radiol. 1980;31:635–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen MD. Choosing contrast media for the evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract of neonates and infants. Radiology. 1987;162:447–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ratcliffe JF. The use of low osmolarity water-soluble contrast media in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract: a report of 115 examinations. Pediatr Radiol. 1986;16:47–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS, Friedman AC, Grumbach K, Radecki PD. Esophageal disruption: evaluation with Iohexol esophagography. Radiology. 1988;1:141–3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Iohexol package insert. GE Healthcare. 2005. http://www.medlibrary.org/lib/rx/meds/omnipaque/. Accessed July 2007.

  21. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology. 1990;175:621–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Keberle M, Wittenberg G, Trasen A, Baumgartner W, Hohn D. Comparison of iodinated and barium-containing contrast media of different viscosity in the detection of pharyngeal perforation. Fortschr Rontg Neuen. 2001;173:691–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Swanson JO, Levine MS, Redfern RO, Rubesin SE. Usefulness of high-density barium for detection of leaks after esophagogastrectomy, total gastrectomy and total laryngectomy. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:415–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Julie A. Harris declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie A. Harris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, J.A., Bartelt, D., Campion, M. et al. The Use of Low-Osmolar Water-Soluble Contrast in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Exams. Dysphagia 28, 520–527 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9462-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9462-0

Keywords

Navigation