Abstract
This original pilot study was conducted to explore and understand the factors that influence a patient’s decision-making when considering percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement for nonoral nutrition and hydration supplementation. Seven patients living with progressive dysphagic symptoms who had made a decision about percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement were interviewed and their responses analyzed using the constant comparison method. All participants felt they had no option other than to accept the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The impact of visible physical deterioration and medical opinion were the most powerful influences on patients’ decisions. Patients’ perception of their involvement in the decision varied. This was linked to the amount and timing of information supplied and support they felt they received. Few patients have prior knowledge of tube feeding and rely heavily on medical advice. Effective communication by healthcare professionals can promote an environment that is supportive of patients’ involvement in decisions. Adequate preparation time is vital if patients are to stop feeling uninvolved or peripheral to the decision-making process. Multidisciplinary teams need to address their working practices so that they do not intimidate patients, but rather empower patients in their decision-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jones DB, Russell C, Glencourse C. BANS: Topline results from the British Artificial Nutrition Survey you really need to know. Complete Nutr 2004;4
Goodhall L. Tube feeding dilemmas: can artificial nutrition and hydration be legally or ethically withheld or withdrawn. J Adv Nurs 1997;25:217–222
Pennington C. To PEG or not to PEG. Clin Med 2002;2:250–254
Planas M, Camilo M. Artificial nutrition: dilemmas in decision-making. Clin Nutr 2002;21:355–361
Rabeneck L, McCullough L, Wray N. Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Lancet 1997;349:496–498
Collaboration TFT, Dennis M. Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): a mulicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:764–772
News/health B: Patient loses right-to-food fight. http://www.newsbbc.co.uk, 2006 [accessed September, 2006]
Klose J, Heldwein W, Rafferzeder M, Sernetz F, Gross M, Loeschke K. Nutritional status and quality of life in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in practice. Prospective one year follow-up. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:2057–2063
Craig GM, Scambler G. Negotiating mothering against the odds: gastrostomy tube feeding, stigma, governmentality and disabled children. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:1115–1125
Borrell-Carrio F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:576–582
Colodny N. Dysphagic independent feeders’ justifications for noncompliance with recommendations by a speech-language pathologist. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2005;14:61–70
Deber R, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1414–1420
Mazur D, Hickam D. Patients’ preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:114–117
Quill T, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:763–769
Strull W, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984;252:2990–2994
Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71–72
Forbes R, Colville S, Swingler R. Frequency, timing and outcome of gastrostomy tubes for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neurone disease. J Neurol 2004;251:813–817
Glaser B. The constant comparative methods of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 1965;12:436–445
Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987
Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications; 1994
Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109–112
McKinstry B. Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. BMJ 2000;321:867–871
Schaeffer MH. Environmental stress and individual decision-making: implications for the patient. Patient Educ Couns 1989;13:221–235
Ogden J. Health psychology: a text book. 3rd ed. Berkshire UK: Open University Press; 2004
O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995;15:25–30
Mazur DJ, Hickam DH, Mazur MD, Mazur MD. The role of doctor’s opinion in shared decision making: what does shared decision making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures? Health Expect 2005;8:97–102
Laakkonen M-L, Pitkala K, Strandburg T, Berglind S, Tilvis R. Older people’s reasoning for resuscitation preferences and their role in the decision-making process. Resuscitation 2005;65:165–171
Sackett D, Strauss S, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. London:Churchill Livingstone; 2000
Drane JF, Coulehan JL. The best-interest standard: surrogate decision making and quality of life. J Clin Ethics 1995;6:20–29
Acknowledgments
Special thanks go to the patients and carers who participated in the study and to the Nutritional Nurse Specialist.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The interview is semistructured, following broad themes but exact wording and ordering can be altered to facilitate the best flow of information. The questions in italics are suggested as prompts to further explore a topic.
How Do Patients Make a Decision About PEG Placement?
Interview Schedule
Time: approx. 60 min
Introduction and Thanks for Participation
Section A: Background
-
1. Tell me about your swallowing difficulties:
-
How long have you had problems?
-
Was it a gradual or sudden onset?
-
Can you eat anything at all?
-
How did you feel when the problems began?
-
How would you describe the effects on your life?
-
Section B: Information
-
2. Who has been involved in the treatment of your swallowing difficulties?
-
Did you see your GP/SaLT/Specialist Doctor?
-
Were you given information about the problems?
-
Who gave you the information?
-
Do you feel you understood the nature of your difficulties?
-
Do you think you had enough information/would you have liked more?
-
Did you feel able to ask questions?
-
-
3. Who first mentioned the idea of a feeding tube to you?
-
Do you remember who first told you about tube feeding?
-
Did you understand the term?
-
Had you heard the term before?
-
Do you feel it was explained well?
-
Did you understand what it would involve?
-
How did you feel when it was mentioned to you?
-
Section C: Values
-
4. What did you consider when you made your decision to go ahead or decline the PEG placement?
-
Did you have strong feelings about alternative feeding?
-
How did you feel when it was mentioned to you?
-
Were your religious beliefs/social values important?
-
Your overall health?
-
Your thoughts and hopes for the future?
-
Section D: Outside Pressures
-
5. Tell me what your family/friends thought about the idea.
-
Did you ask their opinions?
-
Were their opinions important to you?
-
Did they influence the decision you made?
-
What about your doctor?
-
Did you feel the doctors or medical team had a strong opinion about the feeding tube?
-
Did they suggest that you should go ahead or not?
-
Did their opinions feel important to you?
-
Did this have an impact on your thoughts /decisions?
-
Section E: Support
-
6. Was it a difficult decision to make?
-
Did you take a long time to consider?
-
Were you given time to consider your decision?
-
Did you ask for help in making your decision?
-
Whose opinion did you value most?
-
Did you feel well supported in making the decision?
-
Section F: Reflection
-
7. Do you remember much about the procedure?
-
Was there much pain/discomfort?
-
Did that last long?
-
Were you prepared for that?
-
-
8. Are you happy with the decision that you made?
-
Was it the right choice for you?
-
Did it turn out the way you expected?
-
Would you make the same choices again?
-
What would you advise others in the same situation?
-
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vesey, S., Leslie, P. & Exley, C. A Pilot Study Exploring the Factors that Influence the Decision to have PEG Feeding in Patients with Progressive Conditions. Dysphagia 23, 310–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9149-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9149-0