, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 125–132 | Cite as

Evaluation of Normal Deglutition with the Help of Rectified Surface Electromyography Records

  • Michael VaimanEmail author
  • Ephraim Eviatar
  • Samuel Segal


Surface electromyographic (sEMG) studies were performed on 300 normal adults to estimate normal values of sEMG records of muscle activity in the detection and evaluation of stages of normal swallowing. Our study was a prospective observational study of healthy volunteers. The parameters evaluated during swallowing include the timing, amplitude (voltage), and graphic patterns of activity of the orbicularis oris, masseter, submental, and laryngeal strap muscles covered by the platysma. Three tests were examined: voluntary single swallows of saliva (“dry” swallow), voluntary single water swallows (“normal”), and voluntary single swallows of excessive amounts of water (20 ml, “stress test”). Duration and amplitude of muscle activity in oral, pharyngeal, and initial esophageal stages of swallowing (mean + standard deviation, range + standard deviation) were measured for groups of adults of different ages (18–40, 41–70, 70+ years). Shapes of graphic records were evaluated relative to timing and voltage. The overall normal mean values for stage-by-stage duration of muscle activity during single swallowing were established for healthy adults. The duration of muscle activity in all tests showed insignificant increases with age except for the elderly group (70+) in which it was statistically significant (SPSS, χ2 criterion, 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant gender-related differences in duration or amplitude of muscle activity during single swallowing for any age group (p ≥ 0.05). We conclude that the rectified and filtered sEMG provides a noninvasive means to assess certain aspects of complex muscle activity in deglutition. Surface EMG of swallowing is a simple and reliable noninvasive screening method for evaluating swallowing with low levels of discomfort. Stage-by-stage evaluation of duration can be very important for diagnosing the etiology of dysphagia. The combined normative timing of events, amplitude, and graphic data can be used for evaluating complaints and symptoms, as well as for comparison purposes in pre- and postoperative stages and in EMG monitoring during otolaryngological or neurological treatment. These parameters represent stages required for normal deglutition and provide a basis for the comparison of swallowing performance both within and between patients.


Surface electromyography Normal subjects Deglutition Normative database Deglutition disorders 


  1. 1.
    Gupta, V, Reddy, NP, Canilang, EP 1996Surface EMG measurements at the throat during dry and wet swallowingDysphagia11173179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Magendie, F 1813VomissementProcès-verb Acad d Sc5152159174–183Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magendie, F 1813L’epiglotte et ses usages dans le deglutitionProcès-verb Acad d Sc5192199205–216Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Logemann, JA 1983Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing DisordersCollege Hill PressSan Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kahrilas, PJ, Dodds, WJ, Dent, J, Logemann, JA, Shaker, R 1988Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutitionGastroenterology955262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacob, P, Kahrilas, PJ, Logemann, JA, Shah, V, Ha, T 1989Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowingGastroenterology9714691478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doty, RY, Bosma, JF 1956An electromyographic analysis of reflex deglutitionJ Neurophysiol194460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller, AJ 1982DeglutitionPhysiol Rev96129184Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ding, R, Larson, CR, Logemann, JA, Rademaker, AW 2002Surface electromyographic and electroglottographic studies in normal subjects under two swallow conditions: normal and during the Mendelsohn maneuverDysphagia17112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erb, W 1886Handbuch der Electrotherapie, 2 AuflVogelLeipzigpp 3445Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remak, E 1909Grundriss der Electrodiagnostik und Electrotherapie, 2 AuflMeyerWien2634Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goodgold, J 1975Anatomical Correlates of Clinical Electromyography 1Williams & WilkinsBaltimore23Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isley, MR, Kranss, GL, Levin, KH,  et al. 1993Electromyography/ElectroencephalographySpaceLab MedicalRedford, WAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilbourn, AJ, Ferrante, MA 2000Clinical electromyographyJoynt, RJGriggs, RC eds. Baker’s clinical neurology [book on CD-ROM]WB SaundersPhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilbourn AJ: Nerve conduction studies: Types, components, abnormalities, and value in localization. In: Katirji B. (ed.): Clinical Electromyograply. Neurolog Clin 20, 2:310–11, 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McConnel, FMS, Cerenko, D, Mendelsohn, MS 1988Manofluorographic analysis of swallowingOtolaryngol Clin North Am21625636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKeown, MJ, Torpey, DC, Gehm, WC 2002Non-invasive monitoring of functionally distinct muscle activations during swallowingClin Neurophysiol113354366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ertekin, C, Pehlivan, M, Aydogdu, I, Ertas, M, Uludag, B, Celebi, G, Colakoglu, Z, Sagduyu, A, Yuceyar, N 1995An electrophysiological investigation of deglutition in manMuscle Nerve1811771186PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Vaiman
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ephraim Eviatar
    • 1
  • Samuel Segal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyAssaf Harofeh Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.33 Shapira StrBat YamIsrael

Personalised recommendations