Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zur Dynamik der Interaktion in der Supervision

Dynamics of interaction during supervision

  • Ausbildungsforum
  • Published:
Forum der Psychoanalyse Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die komplexen und vielfältigen Funktionen, die der Supervisor ausüben muss, um mit dem Kandidaten zusammen den Verlauf komplexer Prozesse verfolgen zu können, sind unter anderem:

• die Ziele der Supervision im Auge behalten,

• ein Lehrbündnis bilden sowie den Wunsch und die Ambition des Kandidaten zu lernen unterstützen,

• die Dynamik der Ausbildungssituation beachtend, eine Plattform für die komplexen Interaktionen mit den Kandidaten erstellen und die Einflüsse der Institution berücksichtigen,

• den Rahmen für die Arbeit festsetzen,

• untersuchen und reflektierend mitverfolgen, wie Übertragung und Gegenübertragung die Interaktion zwischen Patient und Analytiker sowie zwischen Kandidat und Supervisor beeinflussen,

• die Interaktion zwischen Kandidat und Analysand fokussieren, diese Interaktionen gemeinsam mit dem Kandidaten untersuchen, und ihn dabei dazu anregen, auch selbstständig zu analysieren,

• kontinuierlich Hypothesen über Kernkonflikt, Übertragungsphänomene und Widerstand beim Patienten erarbeiten sowie

• die gemeinsame Arbeit reflektierend und prüfend untersuchen.

Abstract

The manifold functions of a supervisor in following the course of complex processes together with the trainee, are:

• to keep the goals of the supervision in view,

• to establish a teaching alliance and to support the wish and ambitions of the candidate to learn,

• to build a platform for the complex interactions with the trainee with regard to the dynamics of the training situation and keeping in mind the institutional influences,

• to lay down the setting for the work,

• to explore and to reflect how transference and counter-transference influence the interaction between patient and analyst as well as between trainee and supervisor,

• to examine these interactions together focussing continuously on the interaction between candidate and patient, and to encourage the candidate to do the same on his own,

• to continuously formulate hypotheses about the core conflict, the transference phenomena and resistance of the patient,

• to explore and reflect on the cooperative work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Arlow JA (1963) The supervisory situation. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 11:576–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balint M (1948) On the psychoanalytic training system. Int J Psychoanal 29:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett R (1998) Training the trainers: is supervision inherent, caught or taught? In: Clarkson P (ed) Supervision, psychoanalytic and Jungian perspectives. Whurr, London

  • Baudry FD (1993) The personal dimension and management of the supervisory situation with a special note on the parallel process. Psychoanal Q 62:588–614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek T (1954) Countertransference in the training analysis. Bull Menninger Clin 18:12–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beutler LE (1997) The psychotherapist as a neglected variable in psychotherapy: an illustration by reference to the role of therapist experience and training. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 4:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder JL (1993) Is it time to improve psychotherapy training? Clin Psychol Rev 13:301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder JL, Strupp HH (1997) Supervision of psychodynamic psychotherapies. In: Watkins CE Jr (ed) Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. John Wiley, New York, pp 44–62

  • Bell DC de (1963) A critical digest of literature on psychoanalytic supervision. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 11:546–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewald P (1987) Learning process in psychoanalytic supervision: complexities and challenges. International University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehrman MJG (1976) Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bull Menninger Clin 1:9–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstein R, Wallerstein R (1958) The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. Basic Books, New York

  • Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stamford University Press, Stamford

  • Fleming J, Benedek T (1966) Psychoanalytic supervision: a method of clinical teaching. Grune & Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frawley-O’Dea MG, Sarnat JE (2001) The supervisory relationship. Guilford, New York, London

  • Frayn DH (1995) Premature termination issues in psychoanalytic control cases. Can J Psychoanal 3:17–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Gediman HK, Wolkenfeld F (1980) The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: its reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanal Q 44:234–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinberg L (1970) The problems of supervision in psychoanalytic education. Int J Psychoanal 51:371–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross-Doehrman MJ (1976) Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bull Menninger Clin 40:3–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Heising G (1976) Zur Psychodynamik der Supervision. Prax Psychother 21:185–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Issacharoff A (1984) Countertransference in supervision. In: Caligor L, Bromberg P, Meltzer J (eds) Clinical perspectives on the supervision of psycho-analysis and psychotherapy. Plenum, New York

  • Jacob P (1981) The San Francisco project: the analyst at work. In: Wallerstein R (ed) Becoming a psychoanalyst. A study of psychoanalytic supervision. International University Press, New York

  • Jacobs D, David P, Meyer D (1995) The supervisory encounter. Yale University Press, New Haven

  • Kapelle V (1996) How useful is selection? Int J Psychoanal 77:1213–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg O (1984) Changes in the nature of psychoanalytic training and standards of training. In: Wallerstein R (ed), Changes in analysts and in their training. Int Psychoanal Monogr Series No. 4

  • Kernberg O (1996) Thirty different methods to destroy the creativity of the candidates. Int J Psychoanal 77:1031–1040

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg O (2000) A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. Int J Psychoanal 81:97–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács V (1936) Training and control analysis. Int J Psychoanal 17:346–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlöf S, Sigrell B (1998) A discussion of models for the selection of patients for supervised psychoanalysis. J Clin Psychoanal (in press)

  • Langs R (1979) The supervisory experience. Aronson, New York

  • Lester EP, Robertson BM (1995) Multiple interactive processes in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanal Inq 15:211–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GC, Mayerson P, Olsen HE, Wiberg JL (1978) Candidates evaluation of psychoanalytic supervision. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 25:407–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthis I (1981) On shame, women and social conventions. Scand Psychoanal Rev 4:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson PG (1981) On being a member of a supervision study group. In: Wallerstein R (ed) Becoming a psychoanalyst. International University Press, New York

  • Pedder J (1986) Reflections on the theory and practice of supervision. Psychoanal Psychother 2(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1958) The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt S, Skjerva J (2002) Correspondence between supervisors and trainees in their perceptions of supervision events. J Clin Psychol 58:759–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandell R (1985) Influences of supervision, therapist’s competence and patients ego level on the effects of time-limited therapy. Psychother Psychosom 44:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnat JE (1992) Supervision in relationship: resolving the teachtreat controversy in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanal Psychol 9(3):387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles H (1965) Problems of psychoanalytic supervision. In: Searles H (ed) Collected papers in schizophrenia and related subjects. Hogarth, London

  • Shane M, Shane E (1995) “Un-American activities”, and other dilemmas in supervision. Psychoanal Inq 15:226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stimmel B (1995) Resistance to awareness of the supervisor’s transference with special reference to the parallel process. Int J Psychoanal 76:609–618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz TS (1985) Psychoanalytic training: a socio-psychological analysis of its history and present status. Int J Psychoanal 39:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Szecsödy I (1986) Feedback in psychotherapy and training. Nord Psykiatr Tidskr 40:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szecsödy I (1990) The learning process in psychotherapy supervision. Academic dissertation. Karolinska Inst, Stockholm

  • Szecsödy I (1994) Supervision – a complex tool for psychoanalytic training. Scand Psychoanal Rev 17:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Szecsödy I (1997 a) (How) is learning possible in supervision? In: Martindale B, Mörner M, Eugenia M, Rodrigues C, Vidit JP (eds) Supervision and its vicissitudes. Karnac, London

  • Szecsödy I (1997 b) Framing the psychoanalytic frame. Scand Psychoanal Rev 20:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Szecsödy I (1999) How far do our training models meet the needs of the candidates of today. EPF Bull 52:57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Székely L (1979) Some thoughts on psychoanalytic education (not published)

  • Teitelbaum SH (1990) Supertransference: the role of the supervisor’s blind spots. Psychoanal Psychol 7(2):243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomä H, Kächele H (1987) Psychoanalytic practice, vol 1: Principles. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Wallerstein R (1981) Becoming a psychoanalyst. A study of psychoanalytic supervision. International University Press, New York

  • Watkins C (1997) Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. Wiley & Sons, New York

  • Wolkenfeld F (1990) The parallel process phenomenon revisited: some additional thoughts about the supervisory process. In: Lane R (ed) Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. Bruner & Mazel, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brahegatan 30, S-11437, Stockholm, Sweden

    Imre Szecsödy MD PhD

Authors
  1. Imre Szecsödy MD PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imre Szecsödy MD PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szecsödy, I. Zur Dynamik der Interaktion in der Supervision. Forum Psychoanal 23, 393–401 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00451-007-0332-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00451-007-0332-y

Search

Navigation