Evaluating new technological developments for energy systems is becoming more and more complex. The overall application environment is a continuously growing and interconnected cyber-physical system so that analytical assessment is practically impossible to realize. Consequently, new solutions must be evaluated in simulation studies. Due to the interdisciplinarity of the simulation scenarios, various heterogeneous tools must be connected. This approach is known as co-simulation. During the last years, different approaches have been developed or adapted for applications in energy systems. In this paper, two co-simulation approaches are compared that follow generic, versatile concepts. The tool mosaik, which has been explicitly developed for the purpose of co-simulation in complex energy systems, is compared to the High Level Architecture (HLA), which possesses a domain-independent scope but is often employed in the energy domain. The comparison is twofold, considering the tools’ conceptual architectures as well as results from the simulation of representative test cases. It suggests that mosaik may be the better choice for entry-level, prototypical co-simulation while HLA is more suited for complex and extensive studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Schlögl F, Rohjans S, Lehnhoff S, Velasquez J, Steinbrink C, Palensky P (2015) International symposium on smart electric distribution systems and technologies (EDST). IEEE, pp 516–521
Lin H, Sambamoorthy S, Shukla S, Thorp J, Mili L (2011) IEEE PES innovative smart grid technologies (ISGT). IEEE
Godfrey T, Mullen S, Griffith DW, Golmie N, Dugan RC, Rodine C (2010) First IEEE international conference on smart grid communications (SmartGridComm)
Georg H, Müller SC, Dorsch N, Rehtanz C, Wietfeld C (2013) IEEE international conference on smart grid communications (SmartGridComm). IEEE, pp 576–581
Mets K, Verschueren T, Develder C, Vandoorn TL, Vandevelde L (2011) IEEE 16th international workshop on computer aided modeling and design of communication links and networks (CAMAD). IEEE, pp 61–65
Ptolemaeus C (ed) (2014) System design, modeling, and simulation using Ptolemy II. Ptolemy.org
Wetter M (2011) Co-simulation of building energy and control systems with the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed. J Build Perform Simul 4(3):185
Dahmann JS, Fujimoto RM, Weatherly RM (1997) Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation. IEEE Computer Society, pp 142–149
Neema H, Sztipanovits J, Burns M, Griffor E (2016) Workshop on modeling and simulation of cyber-physical energy systems (MSCPES). IEEE
Schütte S, Scherfke S, Tröschel M (2011) IEEE first international workshop on smart grid modeling and simulation (SGMS). IEEE, pp 55–60
Rohjans S, Lehnhoff S, Schütte S, Scherfke S, Hussain S (2013) 4th IEEE/PES innovative smart grid technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE). IEEE
Palensky P, Van Der Meer AA, López CD, Joseph A, Pan K (2017) Cosimulation of intelligent power systems: fundamentals, software architecture, numerics, and coupling. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 11(1):34
Blochwitz T, Otter M, Arnold M, Bausch C, Clauß C, Elmqvist H, Junghanns A, Mauss J, Monteiro M, Neidhold T, Neumerkel D, Olsson H, Peetz JV, Wolf S (2009) 8th international modelica conference, pp 173–184
Widl E, Müller W, Elsheikh A, Hörtenhuber M, Palensky P (2013) Workshop on modeling and simulation of cyber-physical energy systems (MSCPES)
Schütte S (2013) Simulation model composition for the large-scale analysis of smart grid control mechanisms. Ph.D. Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Rohjans S, Widl E, Müller W, Schütte S, Lehnhoff S (2014) Gekoppelte simulation komplexer energiesysteme mittels mosaik und FMI. At-Automatisierungstechnik 62(5):325
van der Meer AA, Palensky P, Heussen K, Morales Bondy DE, Gehrke O, Steinbrink C, Blank M, Lehnhoff S, Widl E, Moyo C, Strasser TI, Nguyen VH, Akroud N, Syed MH, Emhemed A, Rohjans S, Brandl R, Rohjans AM (2017) Workshop on modeling and simulation of cyber-physical energy systems, Pittsburgh, PA
Dahmann JS, Fujimoto RM, Weatherly RM (1998) Winter simulation conference. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36274), Washington, DC, vol 1, pp 797–804. doi:10.1109/WSC.1998.745066
IEEE standard for modeling and simulation (M & S) high level architecture (HLA)—object model template (OMT) specification (2000). IEEE Std 1516.2-2000
IEEE standard for modeling and simulation (M & S) high level architecture (HLA)—object model template (OMT) specification
Noulard E, Rousselot JY, Siron P (2009) Spring simulation interoperability workshop (2009)
Sonnenschein M, Appelrath HJ, Lehnhoff S, Mayer C, Uslar M, Nieße A, Tröschel A, Hofmann L, Kurrat M, Mertens A (2012) VDE-Kongress 2012 - Intelligente Energieversorgung der Zukunft
Brito AV, Negreiros AV (2013) III Brazilian symposium on computing systems engineering
Palmintier B, Krishnamurthy D, Top P, Smith S (2017) Workshop on modeling and simulation of cyber-physical energy systems, Pittsburgh, PA
This work is supported by the European Communitys Horizon 2020 Program (H2020/2014-2020) under project “ERIGrid” (Grant Agreement No. 654113).
About this article
Cite this article
Steinbrink, C., van der Meer, A.A., Cvetkovic, M. et al. Smart grid co-simulation with MOSAIK and HLA: a comparison study. Comput Sci Res Dev 33, 135–143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-017-0379-y
- Cyber-physical energy systems