Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems
  • Journal Aims and Scope
In-network detection of anomaly regions in sensor networks with obstacles
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Contextual outlier detection for wireless sensor networks

10 January 2019

Sourabh Bharti, K. K. Pattanaik & Anshul Pandey

A study on boundary detection in wireless sensor networks

28 September 2022

Srabani Kundu & Nabanita Das

An energy-efficient data aggregation approach for cluster-based wireless sensor networks

20 November 2020

Syed Rooh Ullah Jan, Rahim Khan & Mian Ahmad Jan

RECOD: reliable detection protocol for large-scale and dynamic continuous objects in wireless sensor networks

03 June 2019

Yongbin Yim, Soochang Park, … Sang-Ha Kim

Automated Fault Diagnosis in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

03 July 2022

Rakesh Ranjan Swain, Tirtharaj Dash & Pabitra Mohan Khilar

Improved approaches for density-based outlier detection in wireless sensor networks

01 April 2021

Aymen Abid, Salim El Khediri & Abdennaceur Kachouri

Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Neighbourhood

15 August 2020

Umang Gupta, Vandana Bhattacharjee & Partha Sarathi Bishnu

An automated sensor nodes’ speed estimation for wireless sensor networks

29 March 2018

Fatma Somaa, Inès El Korbi, … Leila Azouz Saidane

A Lightweight Anomaly Detection Method Based on SVDD for Wireless Sensor Networks

14 February 2019

Yunhong Chen & Shuming Li

Download PDF
  • Special Issue Paper
  • Open Access
  • Published: 21 April 2009

In-network detection of anomaly regions in sensor networks with obstacles

  • Conny Franke1,
  • Marcel Karnstedt2,
  • Daniel Klan2,
  • Michael Gertz3,
  • Kai-Uwe Sattler2 &
  • …
  • Elena Chervakova4 

Computer Science - Research and Development volume 24, pages 153–170 (2009)Cite this article

  • 597 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In the past couple of years, sensor networks have evolved into an important infrastructure component for monitoring and tracking events and phenomena in several, often mission critical application domains. An important task in processing streams of data generated by these networks is the detection of anomalies, e.g., outliers or bursts, and in particular the computation of the location and spatial extent of such anomalies in a sensor network. Such information is then used as an important input to decision making processes.

In this paper, we present a novel approach that facilitates the efficient computation of such anomaly regions from individual sensor readings. We propose an algorithm to derive regions with a spatial extent from individual (anomalous) sensor readings, with a particular focus on obstacles present in the sensor network and the influence of such obstacles on anomaly regions. We then improve this approach by describing a distributed in-network processing technique where the region detection is performed at sensor nodes and thus leads to important energy savings. We demonstrate the advantages of this strategy over a traditional, centralized processing strategy by employing a cost model for real sensors and sensor networks.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  1. MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (2004) Intel lab sensor data. http://db.csail.mit.edu/labdata/labdata.html

  2. California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) (2008) http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov

  3. Angiulli F, Fassetti F (2007) Detecting distance-based outliers in streams of data. In: Proc. 16th ACM Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’07), New York, pp. 811–820

  4. Basu S, Meckesheimer M (2007) Automatic outlier detection for time series: an application to sensor data. Knowl Inf Sys 11(2):137–154

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kant Chintalapudi K, Govindan R (2003) Localized edge detection in sensor fields. In: Proc. 1st IEEE Int. Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, May 2003, pp. 59–70

  6. Culler D, Estrin D, Srivastava M (2004) Overview of sensor networks. IEEE Comput 37(8):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singh Dhillon S, Chakrabarty K (2003) Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks. In: Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 1609–1614

  8. Ding M, Chen D, Xing K, Cheng X (2005) Localized fault-tolerant event boundary detection in sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies INFOCOM 2005, March 2005, Vol. 2, pp. 902–913

  9. Estivill-Castro V, Lee I (2001) Fast spatial clustering with different metrics and in the presence of obstacles. In: Proc. 9th ACM Int. Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM-GIS’01), Atlanta, pp. 142–147

  10. Franke C, Gertz M (2008) Detection and exploration of outlier regions in sensor data streams. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Spatial and Spatiotemporal Data Mining (SSTDM’08), Dec 2008

  11. Gehrke J, Madden S (2004) Query processing in sensor networks. IEEE Pervas Comput 3(1):46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu L, Stankovic JA (2005) Radio-triggered wake-up for wireless sensor networks. Real-time Sys 29:157–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Han J, Kamber M, Tung AKH (2001) Spatial Clustering Methods in Data Mining: A Survey. In: Miller H, Han J (eds) Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. CRC Press, pp. 201–230

  14. Klan D, Karnstedt M, Pölitz C, Sattler KU (2008) Towards burst detection for non-stationary stream data. In: Proc. Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, Data Mining, and Machine Learning (KDML 2008)

  15. Kolingerová I, Zalik B (2006) Reconstructing domain boundaries within a given set of points, using delaunay triangulation. Comput Geosci 32(9):1310–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krause A, Guestrin C, Gupta A, Kleinberg J (2006) Near-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN ’06), New York, pp. 2–10

  17. Krishnamachari B, Estrin D, Wicker SB (2002) The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In: ICDCSW ’02, Washington, DC, pp. 575–578

  18. Lu C-T, Kou Y, Zhao J, Chen L (2007) Detecting and tracking regional outliers in meteorological data. Inf Sci 177(7):1609–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nowak R, Mitra U (2003) Boundary estimation in sensor networks: Theory and methods. Inform Proc Sens Netw 2634:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shasha D, Zhu Y (2004) High Performance Discovery in Time Series: Techniques and Case Studies. Springer, Berlin

  21. Subramaniam S, Palpanas T, Papadopoulos D, Kalogeraki V, Gunopulos D (2006) Online outlier detection in sensor data using non-parametric models. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’06), pp. 187–198

  22. Tung AKH, Hou J, Han J (2001) Spatial clustering in the presence of obstacles. In: Proc. 17th Int. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’01), Washington, DC, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 359–367

  23. Wu W, Cheng X, Ding M, Xing K, Liu F, Deng P (2007) Localized outlying and boundary data detection in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Engin 19(8):1145–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao Y, Gehrke J (2003) Query processing for sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 1st Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’03), January 2003

  25. Yao Y, Gehrke J (2002) The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. ACM SIGMOD Record 31(3):9–18

  26. Zhang J, Lou M, Ling TW, Wang H (2004) Hos-miner: a system for detecting outlyting subspaces of high-dimensional data. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’04), VLDB Endowment, pp. 1265–1268

  27. Zhang J, Papadias D, Mouratidis K, Zhu M (2004) Spatial queries in the presence of obstacles. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’04), Heraklion, Crete, Greece, pp. 366–384

  28. Zhang X, Shasha D (2006) Better burst detection. In: Proc. 22nd Int. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’06), pp. 146–149

  29. Zhao F, Liu J, Liu J, Guibas L, Reich J (2003) Collaborative signal and information processing: An information directed approach. Proc IEEE 1199–1209

  30. Zhu Y, Shasha D (2003) Efficient elastic burst detection in data streams. In: KDD ’03, New York, pp. 336–345

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of California at Davis, Davis, USA

    Conny Franke

  2. Databases and Information Systems Group, Ilmenau University of Technology, Ilmenau, Germany

    Marcel Karnstedt, Daniel Klan & Kai-Uwe Sattler

  3. Institute of Computer Science, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Michael Gertz

  4. Institute of Microelectronics- and Mechatronics Systems, Ilmenau, Germany

    Elena Chervakova

Authors
  1. Conny Franke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcel Karnstedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Klan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Gertz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kai-Uwe Sattler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elena Chervakova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Uwe Sattler.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, C., Karnstedt, M., Klan, D. et al. In-network detection of anomaly regions in sensor networks with obstacles . Comp. Sci. Res. Dev. 24, 153–170 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-009-0063-y

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 2008

  • Accepted: 11 March 2009

  • Published: 21 April 2009

  • Issue Date: October 2009

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-009-0063-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Sensor networks
  • Data streams
  • Outlier detection
  • Distributed computation
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.