Abstract
The selection of highly recombinant protein (RP)-productive Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines is widely carried out in shake flasks. It is assumed that increases in the operating parameters in shake flasks lead to impairments in cell growth and RP production. These effects in cells metabolism are widely associated with high mass transfers and hydrodynamic stress. This study examined the impact of commonly used operational parameters on growth and specific productivity (qP) of two CHO cell lines differentially secreting a humanized anti-hIL8 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and cultured in 250 ml flasks. The evaluated parameters are filling volume (10, 15, and 20%), shaking frequency (60 and 120 revolutions per minute -rpm-), and orbital diameter (25.4 and 19 mm). The analysis of the oxygen transfer was done in terms of the measured volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) and of the hydrodynamics in terms of power input per unit volume of liquid (P/V), the turbulent eddy length scale measured by the Kolmogorov’s microscale of turbulence, the energy dissipation rate, the average shear stress, and the shear rate. Though almost all measured kinetic and stoichiometric parameters remained unchanged, mAb titer included, significant differences were found in maximum cell concentration, 10–45% higher in conditions with lower values of kLa and P/V. Changes in glucose metabolism contributing to qP were only shown in the higher producer cell line. Non-lethal responses to elevated oxygen transfer and shear stress might be present and must be considered when evaluating CHO cell cultures in shake flasks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- C L*:
-
Oxygen concentration at the interfacial saturation
- C L :
-
Oxygen concentration in the liquid bulk
- D :
-
Maximum inner flask diameter, m
- d 0 :
-
Shaking diameter, Mm
- d p :
-
Average cell diameter, m
- DOT:
-
Dissolved oxygen tension, % air saturation
- IVCC:
-
Integral viable cell concentration, 106 cells ml−1 day
- k L a :
-
Volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient, h−1
- Lac/Glc:
-
Lactate/glucose ratio
- mAb:
-
Anti-hIL8 monoclonal antibody
- n :
-
Shaking frequency, Rpm
- Ne′:
-
Modified power number
- Ph:
-
Phase number
- P/V:
-
Power consumption per unit volume, W m−3
- q Ca2 + :
-
Specific calcium uptake rate, nmol calcium 10–6 cells day−1
- q Glc :
-
Specific glucose uptake rate, μMol glucose 10–6 cells day−1
- q Lac :
-
Specific lactate production rate, μMol lactate 10–6 cells day−1
- q Glu :
-
Specific glutamate production rate, μMol glutamate 10–6 cells day−1
- q NH4 + :
-
Specific ammonium production rate, μMol ammonium 10–6 cells day−1
- q P :
-
Specific IgG production rate, Pcd 10–3
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- RP:
-
Recombinant protein
- t D :
-
Doubling time, h
- v :
-
Dynamic viscosity, Pa s
- V N :
-
Nominal volume, ml
- V F :
-
Filling volume, % liquid volume/nominal flask volume
- V :
-
Filling volume, ml
- X max :
-
Maximum cell concentration 106 cells ml−1
- Ɛ :
-
Energy dissipation rate W kg−1
- Ɛ 0 :
-
Average energy dissipation rate, W kg−1
- ρ :
-
Density, kg m−3
- μ:
-
Specific growth rate, h−1
- λ :
-
Turbulent eddy length scale, μM
- τ :
-
Average shear stress, N m−2
- γ :
-
Shear rate, s−1
References
Trummer E, Fauland K, Seidinger S, Schriebl K, Lattenmayer C, Kunert R, Vorauer-Uhl K, Weik R, Borth N, Katinger H, Müller D (2006) Process parameter shifting: Part I. Effect of DOT, pH, and temperature on the performance of Epo-Fc expressing CHO cells cultivated in controlled batch bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(6):1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21013
Zhang H, Wang W, Quan C, Fan S (2010) Engineering considerations for process development in mammalian cell cultivation. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11(1):103–112. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920110790725320
Nienow AW (2015) Mass transfer and mixing across the scales in animal cell culture. In: Al-Rubeai M (ed) Animal cell culture. Springer, Dublin, pp 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_5
Sundaramurthy S (2009) Mixing in shake flask bioreactor. Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology. In: Flickinger MC (ed) Bioprocess, bioseparation, and cell technology. John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470054581.eib662
Czermak P, Pörtner R, Brix A (2009) Special engineering aspects. In: Eibl R, Eibl D, Pörtner R, Catapano G, Czermak P (eds) Cell and tissue reaction engineering. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68182-3_4
Chalmers JJ, Ma N (2015) Hydrodynamic damage to animal cells. In: Al-Rubeai M (ed) Animal cell culture. Springer, Dublin, pp 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_6
Maier U, Büchs J (2001) Characterization of the gas-liquid mass transfer in shaking bioreactors. Biochem Eng J 7(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00107-8
Klöckner W, Büchs J (2012) Advances in shaking technologies. Trends Biotechnol 30(6):307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.03.001
Micheletti M, Barrett T, Doig SD, Baganz F, Levy MS, Woodley JM, Lye GJ (2006) Fluid mixing in shaken bioreactors: Implications for scale-up predictions from microlitre-scale microbial and mammalian cell cultures. Chem Eng Sci 61(9):2939–2949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.11.028
Abidin SZ, Anuar N (2011) Comparison of the production of recombinant protein in suspension culture of CHO cells in spinner flask and shake flask system. IIUM Eng J 12(4):43–49. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v12i4.180
Platas OB, Sandig V, Pörtner R, Zeng AP (2013) Evaluation of process parameters in shake flasks for mammalian cell culture. BMC Proc (BioMed Central) 7(6):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-7-S6-P17
Qian Y, Xing Z, Lee S, Mackin NA, He A, Kayne PS, He Q, Qian NX, Li ZJ (2014) Hypoxia influences protein transport and epigenetic repression of CHO cell cultures in shake flasks. Biotechnol J 9(11):1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400315
Maschke RW, Seidel S, Bley T, Eibl R, Eibl D (2021) Determination of culture design spaces in shaken disposable cultivation systems for CHO suspension cell cultures. Biochem Eng J 177:108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108224
Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E (2009) Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biotechnol Adv 27:153–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.08.001
Keane JT, Ryan D, Gray PP (2003) Effect of shear stress on expression of a recombinant protein by Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 81(2):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10472
Godoy-Silva R, Mollet M, Chalmers JJ (2009) Evaluation of the effect of chronic hydrodynamical stresses on cultures of suspended CHO-6E6 cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 102(4):1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22146
Godoy-Silva R, Chalmers JJ, Casnocha SA, Bass LA, Ma N (2009) Physiological responses of CHO cells to repetitive hydrodynamic stress. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(6):1103–1117. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22339
Ritacco FV, Wu Y, Khetan A (2018) Cell culture media for recombinant protein expression in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells: history, key components, and optimization strategies. Biotechnol Prog 34(6):1407–1426. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2706
Zhang X, Bürki CA, Stettler M, De Sanctis D, Perrone M, Discacciati M, Parolini N, DeJesus M, Hacker DL, Quarteroni A, Wurm FM (2009) Efficient oxygen transfer by surface aeration in shaken cylindrical containers for mammalian cell cultivation at volumetric scales up to 1000 L. Biochem Eng J 45(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2009.02.003
Nienow AW (2006) Reactor engineering in large scale animal cell culture. Cytotechnology 50:9–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-006-9005-8
Büchs J, Maier U, Milbradt C, Zoels B (2000) Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: II. Nondimensional description of specific power consumption and flow regimes in unbaffled flasks at elevated liquid viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng 68(6):594–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000620)68:6%3c594::AID-BIT2%3e3.0.CO;2-U
Büchs J (2001) Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures. Biochem Eng J 7(2):91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00106-6
Zhang H, Williams-Dalson W, Keshavarz-Moore E, Shamlou PA (2005) Computational-fluid-dynamics (CFD) analysis of mixing and gas-liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 41:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1042/BA20040082
Tramper J, de Gooijer KD, Vlak JM (2020) Scale-up considerations and bioreactor development for animal cell cultivation. In: Insect cell culture engineering, 1er Ed. CRC Press. 139–177
Pérez-Rodriguez SP, Wulff T, Voldborg BG, Altamirano C, Trujillo-Roldán MA, Valdez-Cruz NA (2021) Compartmentalized proteomic profiling outlines the crucial role of the classical secretory pathway during recombinant protein production in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. ACS Omega 6(19):12439–12458. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06030
Gonzalez TN, Leong SR, Presta LG (2000) Nucleic Acids Encoding Humanized Anti-IL-8 Monoclonal Antibodies. US6025158A
Strober W (2015) Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol 111(1):A3-B. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs111
Reynoso-Cereceda GI, Garcia-Cabrera RI, Valdez-Cruz NA, Trujillo-Roldán MA (2016) Shaken flasks by resonant acoustic mixing versus orbital mixing: mass transfer coefficient kLa characterization and Escherichia coli cultures comparison. Biochem Eng J 105(B):379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.10.015
Van’T Riet K (1979) Review of measuring methods and results in nonviscous gas-liquid mass transfer in stirred vessels. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 18(3):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260071a001
Büchs J, Maier U, Milbradt C, Zoels B (2000) Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: I. Power consumption measurement in unbaffled flasks at low liquid viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng 68(6):589–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000620)68:6%3c589::AID-BIT1%3e3.0.CO;2-J
García-Camacho F, Gallardo-Rodriguez J, Sánchez-Miron A, Cerón-Gracía M, Belarbi E, Molina-Grima E (2007) Determination of shear stress tresholds in toxic dinoflagellates cultured in shake flasks implications in bioprocess engineering. Process Biochem 42:1506–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.08.001
Peter CP, Suzuki Y, Büchs J (2006) Hydromechanical stress in shake flasks: correlation for the maximum local energy dissipation rate. Biotechnol Bioeng 93(6):1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20827
Heinrich C, Wolf T, Kropp C, Northoff S, Noll T (2011) Growth characterization of CHO DP-12 cell lines with different high passage histories. BMC Proc 5(Suppl 8):P29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S8-P29
Sieck JB, Budach WE, Suemeghy Z, Leist C, Villiger TK, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2014) Adaptation for survival: phenotype and transcriptome response of CHO cells to elevated stress induced by agitation and sparging. J Biotechnol 189:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.08.042
Yoo HC, Yu YC, Sung Y, Han JM (2020) Glutamine reliance in cell metabolism. Exp Mol Med 52:1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-00504-8
Pörtner R (2009) Characteristics of mammalian cells and requirements for cultivation. In: Eibl R, Eibl D, Pörtner R, Catapano G, Czermak P (eds) Cell and tissue reaction engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68182-3_2
Pörtner R (2015) Bioreactors for mammalian cells. In: Al-Rubeai M (ed) Animal cell culture. Springer, Dublin, pp 89–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10320-4_4
Bürgin T, Coronel J, Hagens G, Keebler MV, Genzel Y, Reich, U, Anderlei T (2020) Orbitally Shaken single-use bioreactor for animal cell cultivation: fed-batch and perfusion mode. In Animal Cell Biotechnology (pp. 105–123). Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0191-4_7
Kato Y, Tada Y, Iwanaga E, Nagatsu Y, Iwata S, Lee YS, Koh ST (2005) Effects of liquid film formed on flask surface on oxygen transfer rate in shaking flask and development of baffled shaking vessel by optical method based on sulfite oxidation. J Chem Eng Jpn 38(11):873–877. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.38.873
Henzler HJ, Schedel M (1991) Suitability of the shaking flask for oxygen supply to microbiological cultures. Bioprocess Eng 7(3):123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369423
Giese H, Azizan A, Kümmel A, Liao A, Peter CP, Fonseca JA, Hermann R, Duarte TM, Büchs J (2014) Liquid films on shake flask walls explain increasing maximum oxygen transfer capacities with elevating viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng 111(2):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25015
Chopda VR, Holzberg T, Ge X, Folio B, Wong L, Tolosa M, Kostov Y, Tolosa L, Rao G (2020) Real-time dissolved carbon dioxide monitoring II: surface aeration intensification for efficient CO2 removal in shake flasks and mini-bioreactors leads to superior growth and recombinant protein yields. Biotechnol Bioeng 117(4):992–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27252998|
Torres M, Zúñiga R, Gutierrez M, Vergara M, Collazo N, Reyes J, Berrios J, Aguillon JC, Molina MM, Altamirano C (2018) Mild hypothermia upregulates myc and xbp1s expression and improves anti-TNFα production in CHO cells. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0194510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194510
Toussaint C, Henry O, Durocher Y (2016) Metabolic engineering of CHO cells to alter lactate metabolism during fed-batch cultures. J Biotechnol 217:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.11.010
Konakovsky V, Clemens C, Müller MM, Bechmann J, Berger M, Schlatter S, Herwig C (2016) Metabolic control in mammalian fed-batch cell cultures for reduced lactic acid accumulation and improved process robustness. Bioengineering (Basel) 3(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3010005
Sieck JB, Cordes T, Budach WE, Rhiel MH, Suemeghy Z, Leist C, Villiger TK, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2013) Development of a scaled-down model of hydrodynamic stress to study the performance of an industrial CHO cell line under simulated production scale bioreactor conditions. J Biotechnol 164:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.11.012
Acknowledgements
Greta I. Reynoso-Cereceda is a doctoral student from Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and received the fellowship number 478675, from “Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología” CONACYT. We want to extend our gratitude to Sartorius de México, S.A. de C.V. and Biosystems S.A. de C.V. Also, we thank to Nova Biomedicals for providing access to BioProfile FLEX2 Automated Cell Culture Analyzer.
Funding
This work was supported by “Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México” (PAPIIT-UNAM IN210419, IN210822, IN211422, IV201220). Funding sources had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: SP-R, GIR-C, NAV-C, and MAT-R; methodology: SP-R and GIR-C; formal analysis and investigation: SP-R, GIR-C, NAV-C, and MAT-R; writing—original draft preparation: SP-R and GIR-C; writing—review and editing: SP-R, GIR-C, NAV-C, and MAT-R; funding acquisition: NAV-C and MAT-R; resources: NAV-C and MAT-R.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez-Rodriguez, S., Reynoso-Cereceda, G.I., Valdez-Cruz, N.A. et al. A comprehensive comparison of mixing and mass transfer in shake flasks and their relationship with MAb productivity of CHO cells. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 45, 1033–1045 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02722-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02722-y