Skip to main content
Log in

Bacterial dynamics and functions driven by bulking agents to enhance organic degradation in food waste in-situ rapid biological reduction (IRBR)

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different bulking agents (i.e., sawdust, wheat straw, rice straw, and corncob) on bacterial structure and functions for organic degradation during food waste in-situ rapid biological reduction (IRBR) inoculated with microbial agent. Results showed that the highest organic degradation (409.5 g/kg total solid) and volatile solids removal efficiency (41.0%) were achieved when wheat straw was used, largely because the degradation of readily degradable substrates and cellulose was promoted by this bulking agent. Compared with other three bulking agents, the utilization of wheat straw was conducive to construct a more suitable environmental condition (moisture content of 18.0–28.2%, pH of 4.91–5.87) for organic degradation during IRBR process, by virtue of its excellent structural and physiochemical properties. Microbial community analysis suggested that the high-moisture environment in rice straw treatment promoted the growth of Staphylococcus and inhibited the activity of the inoculum. By contrast, lowest bacterial richness was observed in corncob treatment due to the faster water loss. Compared with these two bulking agents, sawdust and wheat straw treatment led to a more stable bacterial community structure, and the inoculated Bacillus gradually became the dominant genus (36.6–57.8%) in wheat straw treatment. Predicted metagenomics analysis showed that wheat straw treatment exhibited the highest carbohydrate metabolism activity which improved the pyruvate, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, and thereby promoted the organic degradation and humic substrate production. These results indicated that wheat straw was a more desirable bulking agent, and revealed the potential microbial organics degradation mechanism in IRBR process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jonge Nd, Davidsson Å, JlC J, Nielsen JL (2020) Characterisation of microbial communities for improved management of anaerobic digestion of food waste. Waste Manag 117:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin Y, Liu Y, Meng S, Kiran EU, Liu Y (2016) Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy 179:1131–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. He P, Zhao L, Zheng W, Wu D, Shao L (2013) Energy balance of a biodrying process for organic wastes of high moisture content: a review. Dry Technol 31:132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2012.693143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan J, Li Y, Zhang H, Zhang D, Chadwick D, Li G, Wang G, Chi M, Yang F (2018) Effects of adding bulking agents on the biodrying of kitchen waste and the odor emissions produced. J Environ Sci 67:344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.08.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu FQ, Li YY, Ge XM, Yang LC, Li Y (2018) Anaerobic digestion of food waste - Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 247:1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. FAO (2019) Food loss and food waste. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  7. Agapiou A, Vamvakari JP, Andrianopoulos A, Pappa A (2016) Volatile emissions during storing of green food waste under different aeration conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:8890–8901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6131-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kucbel M, Raclayska H, Ruzickova J, Svedova B, Sassmanova V, Drozdova J, Raclaysky K, Juchelkova D (2019) Properties of composts from household food waste produced in automatic composters. J Environ Manage 236:657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. UK House of Commons report. The 2001 Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (No. HC 939) (2002) London

  10. Aydin AE, Yildirim P (2021) Understanding food waste behavior: the role of morals, habits and knowledge. J Clean Prod 280:124250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Waqas M, Almeelbi T, Nizami AS (2018) Resource recovery of food waste through continuous thermophilic in-vessel composting. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5212–5222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9358-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China (2012) http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2012-05/05/content_5109.htm

  13. Lv F, Zhang H, Hao L, Shao L, He P (2020) Analysis on the treatment technology of organic fraction of municipal solid waste in the neighborhood or on-site. Environ Sanit Eng 28:1–7. https://doi.org/10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2020.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou S, Zhou H, Xia S, Ying J, Ke X, Zou S, Xue Y, Zheng Y (2021) Efficient bio-degradation of food waste through improving the microbial community compositions by newly isolated Bacillus strains. Bioresour Technol 321:124451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeo J, Oh JI, Cheung HHL, Lee PKH, An AK (2019) Smart food waste recycling bin (S-FRB) to turn food waste into green energy resources. J Environ Manag 234:290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammed M, Ozbay I, Karademir A, Isleyen M (2017) Pre-treatment and utilization of food waste as energy source by bio-drying process. Energy Proc 128:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerda A, Artola A, Font X, Barrena R, Gea T, Sanchez A (2018) Composting of food wastes: status and challenges. Bioresour Technol 248:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar M, Ou YL, Lin JG (2010) Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio. Waste Manag 30:602–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z, Lu H, Ren L, He L (2013) Experimental and modeling approaches for food waste composting: a review. Chemosphere 93:1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas C, Idler C, Ammon C, Amon T (2020) Effects of the C/N ratio and moisture content on the survival of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli during chicken manure composting. Waste Manag 105:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guardia Ad, Petiot C, Rogeau D (2008) Influence of aeration rate and biodegradability fractionation on composting kinetics. Waste Manag 28:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.10.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guidoni LLC, Marques RV, Moncks RB, Botelho FT, da Paz MF, Correa LB, Correa EK (2018) Home composting using different ratios of bulking agent to food waste. J Environ Manag 207:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang L, Sun XY (2016) Influence of bulking agents on physical, chemical, and microbiological properties during the two-stage composting of green waste. Waste Manag 48:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma J, Zhang L, Mu L, Zhu K, Li A (2019) Multivariate insights of bulking agents influence on co-biodrying of sewage sludge and food waste: process performance, organics degradation and microbial community. Sci Total Environ 681:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cai L, Chen TB, Gao D, Yu J (2016) Bacterial communities and their association with the bio-drying of sewage sludge. Water Res 90:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tortosa G, Fernández-González AJ, Lasa AV, Aranda E, Torralbo F, González-Murua C, Fernández-López M, Benítez E, Bedmar EJ (2021) Involvement of the metabolically active bacteria in the organic matter degradation during olive mill waste composting. Sci Total Environ 789:147975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tortosa G, Castellano-Hinojosa A, Correa-Galeote D, Bedmar E (2017) Evolution of bacterial diversity during two-phase olive mill waste (“alperujo”) composting by 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. Bioresour Technol 224:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Awasthi S, Wong J, Li J, Wang Q, Zhang Z, Kumar S, Awasthi M (2018) Evaluation of microbial dynamics during post-consumption food waste composting. Bioresour Technol 251:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Ma Y, Zhang L, Han Y, Yuan J, Li G, Luo W (2021) Relating bacterial dynamics and functions to gaseous emissions during composting of kitchen and garden wastes. Sci Total Environ 767:144210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang C, Gao Z, Shi W, Li L, Tian R, Huang J, Lin R, Wang B, Zhou B (2020) Material conversion, microbial community composition and metabolic functional succession during green soybean hull composting. Bioresour Technol 316:123823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. MEEPRC (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China) (2012) HJ634–2012. China Standards Press

  32. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Horwitz W (2005) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 18th edn. AOAC International Champaign, Illinois

  34. Nielsen (2002) Food analysis. China Light Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goering HK, van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 379

  36. Zhang D, He P, Jin T, Shao L (2008) Bio-drying of municipal solid waste with high water content by aeration procedures regulation and inoculation. Bioresour Technol 99:8796–8802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarifudin A, Keeratiburana T, Soontaranon S, Tangsathitkulchai C, Tongta S (2020) Pore characteristics and structural properties of ethanol-treated starch in relation to water absorption capacity. LWT Food Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang B, Zhang L, Jahng D (2014) Importance of initial moisture content and bulking agent for biodrying sewage sludge. Dry Technol 32:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.795586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou Y, Selvam A, Wong JWC (2018) Chinese medicinal herbal residues as a bulking agent for food waste composting. Bioresour Technol 249:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X, Selvam A, Chan MT, Wong JWC (2013) Nitrogen conservation and acidity control during food wastes composting through struvite formation. Bioresour Technol 147:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma J, Zhang L, Mu L, Zhu K, Li A (2019) Energetic enhancement of thermal assistance in the cooling stage of biodrying by stimulating microbial degradation. Waste Manag 89:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hao Z, Jahng D (2019) Variations of organic matters and extracellular enzyme activities during biodrying of dewatered sludge with different bulking agents. Biochem Eng J 147:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shah AT, Favaro L, Alibardi L, Cagnin L, Sandon A, Cossu R, Casella S, Basaglia M (2016) Bacillus sp strains to produce bio-hydrogen from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Appl Energy 176:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu J, Zhao Y, Qi H, Zhao X, Yang T, Du Y, Zhang H, Wei Z (2017) Identifying the key factors that affect the formation of humic substance during different materials composting. Bioresour Technol 244:1193–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Roy A, Dutta A, Pal S, Gupta A, Sarkar J, Chatterjee A, Saha A, Sarkar P, Sar P, Kazy SK (2018) Biostimulation and bioaugmentation of native microbial community accelerated bioremediation of oil refinery sludge. Bioresour Technol 253:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li M, He X, Tang J, Li X, Zhao R, Tao Y, Wang C, Qiu Z (2021) Influence of moisture content on chicken manure stabilization during microbial agent-enhanced composting. Chemosphere 264:128549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S-PZ data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing–original draft. H-YZ methodology, formal analysis, writing–review and editing. J-CS formal analysis, methodology, investigation. CL methodology, investigation. XK methodology. S-PZ methodology. Y-PX conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, project administration, supervision. Y-GZ funding acquisition, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya-Ping Xue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no financial or commercial conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 636 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, SP., Zhou, HY., Sun, JC. et al. Bacterial dynamics and functions driven by bulking agents to enhance organic degradation in food waste in-situ rapid biological reduction (IRBR). Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 45, 689–700 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02688-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02688-x

Keywords

Navigation