Skip to main content
Log in

A validated strategy to design efficient fermentation-industrial processes: agave spirit production

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An industrial process is profitable when its individual unit operations are efficient and thus, this work shows a guideline for designing efficient fermentation-industrial processes for agave distilled production based on a sequential approach of optimization, beginning in the laboratory and followed by the adjustment of the variable values using the evolutionary operation method for successful process scaling. The results at the laboratory showed that a starter inoculum containing a 5 × 106 cells/mL mixture of Kluyveromyces marxianus, Clavispora lusitaniae, and Kluyveromyces marxianus var. drosophilarum strains in a bioreactor containing agave syrup with 120 g/L fermented sugar, processed at a constant temperature of 33 °C and 1.0 VVM aeration for 1.6 h, led to a fermented product with a 4.18% (v/v) alcohol content after 72 h of processing time. The scale-up process results showed that the best operating conditions at the pilot-plant level were a temperature of 35 °C and aeration at 1.0 VVM for 1.2 h, which led to a fermented product with a 4.22% (v/v) total alcohol content after 72 h of processing time. These represent similar performance values for both production processes, but each one worked with their specific values of process variables, which demonstrates that each level of production had its own specific values for process variables. The volatile compound analysis shows that both distilled products contained a similar profile of volatile components that provide fruity and ethereal aromatic notes pleasant to the palate. Therefore, the process design for agave spirit production at the semi-industrial level was successfully achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandenius CF, Brundin A (2008) Biocatalysts and bioreactor design. Bioprocess optimization using design-of- experiments methodology. Biotechnol Prog 24(6):1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Navarrete-Bolaños JL (2012) Improving traditional fermented beverages: how to evolve from spontaneous to directed fermentation. Review Eng Life Sci 12(4):410–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Navarrete-Bolaños JL, Téllez-Martínez MG, Miranda-López R, Jiménez-Islas H (2017) An experimental strategy validated to design cost-effective culture media based on response surface methodology. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 47(6):578–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2017.1280825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Navarrete-Bolaños JL, González-Torres I, Vargas-Bermúdez VH, Jiménez-Islas H (2020) A biotechnological insight to recycle waste: analyzing the spontaneous fermentation of shrimp waste to design the hydrolysis process of chitin into n-acetylglucosamine. Rev Mex Ing Quím 19(1):263–274. https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/Bio544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. García-Aguirre M, Sáenz-Álvaro VA, Rodríguez-Soto MA, Vicente-Magueyal FJ, Botello-Álvarez E, Jiménez-Islas H et al (2009) A strategy for biotechnological process design applied to the enzymatic hydrolysis of agave fructo-oligosaccharides to obtain fructose-rich syrups. J Agric Food Chem 57:10205–10210. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902855q

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tervasmäkia P, Latva-Kokkob M, Taskilaa S, Tanskanena J (2018) Effect of oxygen transfer on yeast growth—growth kinetic and reactor model to estimate scale-up effects in bioreactors. Food Bioprod Process 111:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.08.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Delvigne F, Takors R, Mudde R, van Gulik W, Noorman H (2017) Bioprocess scale-up/down as integrative enabling technology: from fluid mechanics to systems biology and beyond. Microb Biotechnol 10(5):1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12803

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ju LK, Chase GG (1992) Improved scale-up strategies of bioreactors. Bioprocess Eng 8:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt FR (2005) Optimization and scale up of industrial fermentation processes: mini-review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:425–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pia-Koller A, Wolf L, Brück T, Weuster-Botz D (2018) Studies on the scale-up of biomass production with Scenedesmus spp. in flat-plate gas-lift photobioreactors. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 41(2):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1859-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar S, Katiyar N, Ingle P, Negi S (2011) Use of evolutionary operation (EVOP) factorial design technique to develop a bioprocess using grease waste as a substrate for lipase production. Bioresour Technol 102(7):4909–4912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Box GEP (1957) Evolutionary operation: a method for increasing industrial productivity. J R Stat Soc Ser C 6(2):81–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2985505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery DC (2005) Response surface methods and designs. In: Montgomery DC (ed) Design and analysis of experiments, 6th edn. Wiley, NY, pp 405–463

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller G (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caputi A, UedaBrown MT (1968) Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol in wine. Am J Enol Vitic 19:160–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Molina-Guerrero JA, Botello-Álvarez JE, Estrada-Baltazar A, Navarrete-Bolaños JL, Jiménez-Islas H, Cárdenas-Manríquez M, Rico-Martínez R (2007) Volatile components in mezcal. Rev Mex Ing Quím 6:41–50. http://rmiq.org/ojs311/index.php/rmiq/article/view/1843

  17. Benn SM, Peppard TL (1996) Characterization of tequila flavor by instrumental and sensory analysis. J Agric Food Chem 44:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9504172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de León-Rodríguez A, González-Hernández L, de la Barba Rosa A, Escalante-Minakata P, López M (2006) Characterization of volatile compounds of mezcal, an ethnic alcoholic beverage obtained from Agave salmiana. J Agric Food Chem 54:1337–1341. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052154+

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Tecnológico Nacional de México and Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Guanajuato by financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception, performance, and design of the studies, as well as the interpretation of the results, the critical revision, and final approval of the manuscript. OSJ, HCM, and FJVM performed the experiments and analyzed the experimental data. HJI, and JLNB, were the intellectual authors and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. L. Navarrete-Bolaños.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no known actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations associated with this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navarrete-Bolaños, J.L., Serrato-Joya, O., Chávez-Mireles, H. et al. A validated strategy to design efficient fermentation-industrial processes: agave spirit production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 44, 2245–2255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02600-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02600-z

Keywords

Navigation