Advertisement

Hydrodynamic investigation of a novel shear-generating device for the measurement of anchorage-dependent cell adhesion intensity

Research Paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Proliferation of anchorage-dependent cells occurs after adhesion to a suitable surface. Thus, quantitative information about the force of cells adhesion to microcarriers at early culture phases is vital for scaling up such system. In this work, a newly designed shear-generating device was proposed, based on a previously proposed contraction flow device designed for suspended cells. A design equation for the new device was also proposed to correlate the generated energy dissipation rate (EDR) with the cross-sectional area and flow rate. Microscopic-particle image velocimetry was measured to validate the simulation results, and good agreement was achieved. The newly designed device was then used to measure the adhesion force of MDCK and PK cells, and the results showed that the critical EDR was 3000 W/m3 for MDCK and 5000 W/m3 for PK cells. This quantitative information is of great value for better understanding shearing effects during the scaling up of anchorage-dependent cell cultures.

Keywords

Animal cell culture Adhesion force Energy dissipation rate Microcarriers Modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the State Key Development Program of Basic Research of China (973 Program, Grant no. 2013CB733600), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, Grant no. 2012AA021201), and the China Ministry of Science and Technology under Contract (Grant no. 2012BAI44G00) and the Major Projects of Science and Technology in Anhui Province (Grant no. 17030801036) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Ursache RV, Thomassen YE, van Eikenhorst G, Verheijen PJT, Bakker WAM (2015) Mathematical model of adherent Vero cell growth and poliovirus production in animal component free medium. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heathman TRJ, Glyn VAM, Picken A, Rafiq QA, Coopman K, Nienow AW, Kara B, Hewitt CJ (2015) Expansion, harvest and cryopreservation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a serum-free microcarrier process. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:1696–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chalmers JJ (2015) Mixing, aeration and cell damage, 30+ years later: what we learned, how it affected the cell culture industry and what we would like to know more about. Curr Opin Chem Eng 10:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pawar SB (2018) Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of airlift bioreactor: effect of draft tube configurations on hydrodynamics, cell suspension, and shear rate. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 41:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Rubeai M, Singh RP, Goldman MH, Emery AN (1995) Death mechanisms of animal cells in conditions of intensive agitation. Biotechnol Bioeng 45:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahajan KD, Nabar GM, Xue W, Anghelina M, Moldovan NI, Chalmers JJ, Winter JO (2017) Mechanotransduction effects on endothelial cell proliferation via CD31 and VEGFR2: implications for immunomagnetic separation. Biotechnol J 12Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore LR, Williams PS, Chalmers JJ, Zborowski M (2017) Tessellated permanent magnet circuits for flow-through, open gradient separations of weakly magnetic materials. J Magn Magn Mater 427:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Serrano-Carreon L, Galindo E, Rocha-Valadez JA, Holguin-Salas A, Corkidi G (2015) Hydrodynamics, fungal physiology, and morphology. In: Krull R, Bley T (eds) Filaments in bioprocesses. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolmogorov AN (1991) The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Proc R Soc Lond A 434:9–13Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nienow AW, Hewitt CJ, Heathman TRJ, Glyn VAM, Fonte GN, Hanga MP, Coopman K, Rafiq QA (2016) Agitation conditions for the culture and detachment of hMSCs from microcarriers in multiple bioreactor platforms. Biochem Eng J 108:24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maddah S, Navidbakhsh M (2015) A cell damages study in pulsatile blood flow through two- and three-dimensional obstructed vessels Using the Cosserat continuum approach. J Dispersion Sci Technol 36:496–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu L-H, Chang H-C, Ting P-C, Wang DL (2018) Laminar shear stress promotes mitochondrial homeostasis in endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 233:5058–5069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rayat A, Chatel A, Hoare M, Lye GJ (2016) Ultra scale-down approaches to enhance the creation of bioprocesses at scale: impacts of process shear stress and early recovery stages. Curr Opin Chem Eng 14:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gregoriades N, Clay J, Ma N, Koelling K, Chalmers JJ (2000) Cell damage of microcarrier cultures as a function of local energy dissipation created by a rapid extensional flow. Biotechnol Bioeng 69:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma N, Koelling KW, Chalmers JJ (2002) Fabrication and use of a transient contractional flow device to quantify the sensitivity of mammalian and insect cells to hydrodynamic forces. Biotechnol Bioeng 80:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mollet M, Godoy-Silva R, Berdugo C, Chalmers JJ (2007) Acute hydrodynamic forces and apoptosis: a complex question. Biotechnol Bioeng 98:772–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mollet M, Godoy-Silva R, Berdugo C, Chalmers JJ (2008) Computer simulations of the energy dissipation rate in a fluorescence-activated cell sorter: implications to cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 100:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu W, Berdugo C, Chalmers JJ (2011) The potential of hydrodynamic damage to animal cells of industrial relevance: current understanding. Cytotechnology 63:445–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tran TT, Lee EG, Lee IS, Woo NS, Han SM, Kim YJ, Hwang WR (2016) Hydrodynamic extensional stress during the bubble bursting process for bioreactor system design. Korea Aust Rheol J 28:315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Godoy-Silva R, Mollet M, Chalmers JJ (2009) Evaluation of the effect of chronic hydrodynamical stresses on cultures of suspensed CHO-6E6 cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1119–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jasperson BA, Jeon Y, Turner KT, Pfefferkorn FE, Qu WL (2010) Comparison of micro-pin-fin and microchannel heat sinks considering thermal-hydraulic performance and manufacturability. Ieee Trans Components Packaging Technol 33:148–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Favero JL, Secchi AR, Cardozo NSM, Jasak H (2010) Viscoelastic fluid analysis in internal and in free surface flows using the software OpenFOAM. Comput Chem Eng 34:1984–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lysenko DA, Ertesvåg IS, Rian KE (2012) Large eddy simulation of the flow over a circular cylinder at Reynolds number 3900 using the OpenFOAM toolbox. Flow Turbul Combust 89:491–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silva LFLR., Lage PLC (2011) Development and implementation of a polydispersed multiphase flow model in OpenFOAM. Comput Chem Eng 35:2653–2666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jasak H (2009) OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 1:89–94Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferziger JH, Peric M (2012) Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, New York. ISBN 3-540-42074-6Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Santiago JG, Wereley ST, Meinhart CD, Beebe DJ, Adrian RJ (1998) A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics. Exp Fluids 25:316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Icardi M, Gavi E, Marchisio DL, Barresi AA, Olsen MG, Fox RO, Lakehal D (2011) Investigation of the flow field in a three-dimensional confined impinging jets reactor by means of microPIV and DNS. Chem Eng J 166:294–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li H, Ewoldt R, Olsen MG (2005) Turbulent and transitional velocity measurements in a rectangular microchannel using microscopic particle image velocimetry. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 29:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raghavan RV, Friend JR, Yeo LY (2010) Particle concentration via acoustically driven microcentrifugation: microPIV flow visualization and numerical modelling studies. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wereley ST, Gui L, Meinhart CD (2002) Advanced algorithms for microscale particle image velocimetry. AIAA J 40:1047–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Su Z-Z, Dou J, Xu Z-P, Guo Q-L, Zhou C-L (2012) A novel inhibitory mechanism of baicalein on influenza A/FM1/1/47 (H1N1) virus: interference with mid-late mRNA synthesis in cell culture. Chin J Nat Med 10:415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu B, Xu F, Li J, Shuai J, Li X, Fang W (2012) Porcine circovirus type 2 explores the autophagic machinery for replication in PK-15 cells. Virus Res 163:476–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shiragami N, Hakoda M, Enomoto A, Hoshino T (1997) Hydrodynamic effect on cell attachment to microcarriers at initial stage of microcarrier culture. Bioprocess Eng 16:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vennapusa RR, Aguilar O, Mintong JMB, Helms G, Fritz J, Lahore MF (2010) Biomass-adsorbent adhesion forces as an useful indicator of performance in expanded beds. Sep Sci Technol 45:2235–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hakoda M, Shiragami N (2000) Effects of ion exchange capacities on attachment and growth of anchorage-dependent HeLa cell. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 23:523–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu SC (1999) Influence of hydrodynamic shear stress on microcarrier-attached cell growth: cell line dependency and surfactant protection. Bioprocess Eng 21:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ng YC, Berry JM, Butler M (1996) Optimization of physical parameters for cell attachment and growth on macroporous microcarriers. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of High Magnetic Field and Ion Beam Physical BiologyHefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of SciencesHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor EngineeringEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations