Advertisement

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 531–542 | Cite as

Mixotrophic cultivation of microalgae to enhance the quality of lipid for biodiesel application: effects of scale of cultivation and light spectrum on reduction of α-linolenic acid

  • Suvidha Gupta
  • Sanjay B. Pawar
Research Paper
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

The research on microalgal biodiesel is focused not only on getting the highest lipid productivity but also desired quality of lipid. The experiments were initially conducted on flask scale (1L) using acetate carbon source at different concentrations viz. 0.5, 2, 3 and 4 g L−1. The optimum concentration of acetate was considered for further experiments in two airlift photobioreactors (10 L) equipped separately with red and white LED lights. The Feasibility Index (FI) was derived to analyze the scalability of mixotrophic cultivation based on net carbon fixation in biomass per consumption of total organic carbon. The experimental strategy under mixotrophic mode of cultivation lowered the α-linolenic acid content of lipid by 60–80% as compared to autotrophic cultivation for Scenedesmus abundans species and yielded the highest biomass and lipid productivities, 59 ± 2 and 17 ± 1.8 mg L−1 day−1, respectively. The TOC, nitrate, and phosphate reduction rates were 74.6 ± 3.0, 11.5 ± 1.4, 9.6 ± 2.4 mg L−1 day−1, respectively. The significant change was observed in lipid compositions due to the scale, mode of cultivation, and light spectra. As compared to phototrophic cultivation, biodiesel obtained under mixotrophic cultivation only met standard biodiesel properties. The FI data showed that the mixotrophic cultivation was feasible on moderate concentrations of acetate (2–3 g L−1).

Keywords

Algal biodiesel Lipid enhancement PUFA reduction Bioreactor Red LED 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author is thankful to the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi for their financial support for this research work under the scheme of DST INSPIRE Faculty Award (IFA13-ENG63). Authors are very grateful to the Director of CSIR-NEERI Nagpur and Dr. H. J. Purohit, Head, EBGD, CSIR-NEERI for his continual support to enhance the quality of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

449_2017_1888_MOESM1_ESM.tif (7.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIF 7770 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Gim GH, Kim JK, Kim HS, Kathiravan MN, Yang H, Jeong SH, Kim SW (2014) Comparison of biomass production and total lipid content of freshwater green microalgae cultivated under various culture conditions. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apel AC, Weuster-Botz D (2015) Engineering solutions for open microalgae mass cultivation and realistic indoor simulation of outdoor environments. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:995–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pawar S (2016) Effectiveness mapping of open raceway pond and tubular photobioreactors for sustainable production of microalgae biofuel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:640–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li T, Zheng Y, Yu L, Chen S (2014) Mixotrophic cultivation of a Chlorella sorokiniana strain for enhanced biomass and lipid production. Biomass Bioenerg 66:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Praveenkumar R, Kim B, Choi E, Lee K, Cho S, Hyun JS, Park JY, Lee YC, Lee HU, Lee JS, Oh YK (2014) Mixotrophic cultivation of oleaginous Chlorella sp. KR-1 mediated by actual coal-fired flue gas for biodiesel production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37:2083–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheirsilp B, Torpee S (2012) Enhanced growth and lipid production of microalgae under mixotrophic culture condition: effect of light intensity, glucose concentration and fed-batch cultivation. Bioresour Technol 110:510–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fei Q, Fu R, Shang L, Brigham CJ, Chang HN (2015) Lipid production by microalgae Chlorella protothecoides with volatile fatty acids (VFAs) as carbon sources in heterotrophic cultivation and its economic assessment. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Francisco EC, Neves DB, Lopes EJ, Franco TT (2010) Microalgae as feedstock for biodiesel production: carbon dioxide sequestration, lipid production and biofuel quality. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perez-Garcia O, Escalante FME, de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2011) Heterotrophic cultures of microalgae: metabolism and potential products. Water Res 45:11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vidyashankar S, Deviprasad K, Chauhan VS, Ravishankar GA, Sarada R (2013) Selection and evaluation of CO2 tolerant indigenous microalga Scenedesmus dimorphus for unsaturated fatty acid rich lipid production under different culture conditions. Bioresour Technol 144:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C, Ceniceros E, Natarajan M (2012) Review of biodiesel composition, properties, and specifications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:143–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta S, Pandey R, Pawar S (2016) Microalgal bioremediation of food-processing industrial wastewater under mixotrophic conditions. Front Chem Sci Eng 10:499–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupta S, Pandey R, Pawar S (2017) Bioremediation of synthetic high strength chemical oxygen demand wastewater using microalgae sp. Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Bioremediat J 21:38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anahas AMP, Muralitharan G (2015) Isolation and screening of heterocystous cyanobacterial strains for biodiesel production by evaluating the fuel properties from fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles. Bioresour Technol 184:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krisnangkura KA (1986) Simple method for estimation of cetane index of vegetable oil methyl esters. J Am Oil Chem Soc 63:552–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramos MJ, Fernandez CM, Casas A, Rodriguez L, Perez A (2009) Influence of fatty acid composition of raw materials on biodiesel properties. Bioresour Technol 100:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen QH, Jiang JW, Chen LP, Cheng LH, Xu XH, Chen HL (2015) Effect of carbon source on biomass growth and nutrients removal of Scenedesmus obliquus for wastewater advanced treatment and lipid production. Bioresour Technol 190:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chapman SP, Paget CM, Johnson GN, Schwartz JM (2015) Flux balance analysis reveals acetate metabolism modulates cyclic electron flow and alternative glycolytic pathways in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Front Plant Sci 6:474.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu X, Duan S, Li A, Xu N, Cai Z, Hu Z (2009) Effects of organic carbon sources on growth, photosynthesis, and respiration of Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J Appl Phycol 21:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krzeminska I, Oleszek M (2016) Glucose supplementation-induced changes in the Auxenochlorella protothecoides fatty acid composition suitable for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 218:1294–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pawar SB (2016) Process engineering aspects of vertical gas sparged photobioreactors for mass production of microalgae. ChemBioEng Rev 3:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pawar SB (2017) Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of airlift bioreactor: effect of draft tube configurations on hydrodynamics, cell suspension, and shear rate. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1841-8 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baba M, Kikuta F, Suzuki I, Watanabe MM, Shiraiwa Y (2012) Wavelength specificity of growth, photosynthesis, and hydrocarbon production in the oil-producing green alga Botryococcus braunii. Bioresour Technol 109:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yan C, Zhao Y, Zheng Z, Luo X (2013) Effects of various LED light wavelengths and light intensity supply strategies on synthetic high-strength wastewater purification by Chlorella vulgaris. Biodegradation 24:721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yan C, Luo X, Zheng Z (2013) Performance of purifying anaerobic fermentation slurry using microalgae in response to various LED light wavelengths and intensities. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:1622–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Edmundson SJ, Huesemann MH (2015) The dark side of algae cultivation: characterizing night biomass loss in three photosynthetic algae, Chlorella sorokiniana, Nannochloropsis salina and Picochlorum sp.. Algal Res 12:470–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gonzalez-Garcinuno A, Tabernero A, Sanchez-Alvarez JM, Martin del Valle EM, Galan MA (2014) Effect of nitrogen source on growth and lipid accumulation in Scenedesmus abundans and Chlorella ellipsoidea. Bioresour Technol 173:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Y, Chen T, Qin S (2013) Differential fatty acid profiles of Chlorella kessleri grown with organic materials. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Biotechnology and Genomics DivisionCSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI)NagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations