Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 489–499 | Cite as

Efficient production of lycopene by engineered E. coli strains harboring different types of plasmids

Research Paper


The lycopene biosynthetic genes crtE, crtB, and crtI from Deinococcus wulumuqiensis R12 were integrated into three different vector backbones—pET28a, pTrc99A, and pUC18—and the resulting recombinant plasmids pET28a-EBI, pTrc99A-EBI, and pUC18-EBI were introduced into different Escherichia coli hosts. The results showed that lycopene production of strain 28BL was lower than that of 99 series strains without IPTG in LB medium. In addition, lycopene production of 99JM with supplementation of 20% (w/v) glycerol was 1.6-fold higher than with supplementation of 6% (w/v) glucose. After optimization of the host strain and culture medium, the yield of microbial lycopene was increased successfully. When recombinant E. coli 99DH was cultivated under exposure to light in 2YT + Gly medium, the highest lycopene production rate was 26.2 mg/L/h at 30 h, and the maximum specific lycopene content was 67 mg/g dry cell (925 mg/L) at 40 h, which represents a 76% increase over the starting point.


Copy number Recombinant Escherichia coli Biosynthesis Lycopene 



This work was supported by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1603112), the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (21406111), and the Program for Innovative Research Team in Universities of Jiangsu Province (2015).

Compliance with ethical standards

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study does not contain any experiments involving human subjects or experimental animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Di Mascio P, Kaiser S, Sies H (1989) Lycopene as the most efficient biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch Biochem Biophys 274:532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kong KW, Khoo HE, Prasad KN, Ismail A, Tan CP, Rajab NF (2010) Revealing the power of the natural red pigment lycopene. Molecules 15:959–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matos HR, Capelozzi VL, Gomes OF, Di Mascio P, Medeiros MH (2001) Lycopene inhibits DNA damage and liver necrosis in rats treated with ferric nitrilotriacetate. Arch Biochem Biophys 396:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Story EN, Kopec RE, Schwartz SJ, Harris GK (2010) An update on the health effects of tomato lycopene. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 1:189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu XJ, Liu RS, Li HM, Tang YJ (2012) Lycopene production from synthetic medium by Blakeslea trispora NRRL 2895 (+) and 2896 (−) in a stirred-tank fermenter. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:739–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hundle B, Alberti M, Nievelstein V, Beyer P, Kleinig H, Armstrong G, Burke D, Hearst J (1994) Functional assignment of Erwinia herbicola Eho10 carotenoid genes expressed in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet MGG 245:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verwaal R, Wang J, Meijnen J-P, Visser H, Sandmann G, van den Berg JA, van Ooyen AJ (2007) High-level production of beta-carotene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by successive transformation with carotenogenic genes from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4342–4350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiang W, Ling-ran F, Luo W, Han-guang L, Lin W, Ya Z, Xiao-bin Y (2014) Mutation breeding of lycopene-producing strain Blakeslea trispora by a novel atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emadi H, Amaninejad P, Emtiazjoo M, Sahhafi HH (2010) Effects of Dunaliella microalgae (Dunaliellasalina) on different levels of complement C3, C4 and antioxidant capacity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss). Adv Environ Biol 4:456–464Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang J-F, Liu X-J, Liu R-S, Li H-M, Tang Y-J (2012) Optimization of the mated fermentation process for the production of lycopene by Blakeslea trispora NRRL 2895 (+) and NRRL 2896 (−). Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Q, Zhu L, Wang Y, Li D, Wan D, Tang Y (2009) Advance on the production of lycopene by microbial fermentation. Food Ferment Ind 35:157–161Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moise AR, Al-Babili S, Wurtzel ET (2014) Mechanistic aspects of carotenoid biosynthesis. Chem Rev 114:164–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao J, Li Q, Sun T, Zhu X, Xu H, Tang J, Zhang X, Ma Y (2013) Engineering central metabolic modules of Escherichia coli for improving beta-carotene production. Metab Eng 17:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramos KRM, Valdehuesa KNG, Liu H, Nisola GM, Lee W-K, Chung W-J (2014) Combining De Ley–Doudoroff and methylerythritol phosphate pathways for enhanced isoprene biosynthesis from d-galactose. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37:2505–2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Das A, Yoon S-H, Lee S-H, Kim J-Y, Oh D-K, Kim S-W (2007) An update on microbial carotenoid production: application of recent metabolic engineering tools. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun T, Miao L, Li Q, Dai G, Lu F, Liu T, Zhang X, Ma Y (2014) Production of lycopene by metabolically-engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett 36:1515–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoon SH, Lee YM, Kim JE, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JY, Jung KH, Shin YC, Keasling JD, Kim SW (2006) Enhanced lycopene production in Escherichia coli engineered to synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate from mevalonate. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:1025–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim YS, Lee JH, Kim NH, Yeom SJ, Kim SW, Oh DK (2011) Increase of lycopene production by supplementing auxiliary carbon sources in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:489–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang T-C, Li W, Luo X-G, Feng C-X, Zhang M-H, Du W, Ma D-Y (2015) Increase of the lycopene production in the recombinant strains of Escherichia coli by supplementing with fructose. Adv Appl Biotechnol 332, pp 29–35Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu F, Lu L, Fu S, Zhong X, Hu M, Deng Z, Liu T (2015) Targeted engineering and scale up of lycopene overproduction in Escherichia coli. Process Biochem 50:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen Y-Y, Shen H-J, Cui Y-Y, Chen S-G, Weng Z-M, Zhao M, Liu J-Z (2013) Chromosomal evolution of Escherichia coli for the efficient production of lycopene. BMC Biotechnol 13:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang J, Guo L (2014) Biosynthesis of β-carotene in engineered E. coli using the MEP and MVA pathways. Microb Cell Fact 13:160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoon SH, Kim JE, Lee SH, Park HM, Choi MS, Kim JY, Lee SH, Shin YC, Keasling JD, Kim SW (2007) Engineering the lycopene synthetic pathway in E. coli by comparison of the carotenoid genes of Pantoea agglomerans and Pantoea ananatis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nishizaki T, Tsuge K, Itaya M, Doi N, Yanagawa H (2007) Metabolic engineering of carotenoid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by ordered gene assembly in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1355–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lim HN, Lee Y, Hussein R (2011) Fundamental relationship between operon organization and gene expression. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences vol 108, pp 10626–10631Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang S, Zhao X, Tao Y, Lou C (2015) A novel approach for metabolic pathway optimization: Oligo-linker mediated assembly (OLMA) method. J Biol Eng 9:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang Z, Jin L, Yuan Z, Węgrzyn G, Węgrzyn A (2009) Classification of plasmid vectors using replication origin, selection marker and promoter as criteria. Plasmid 61:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friehs K (2004) Plasmid copy number and plasmid stability. New trends and developments in biochemical engineering. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nacken V, Achstetter T, Degryse E (1996) Probing the limits of expression levels by varying promoter strength and plasmid copy number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 175:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim SW, Kim JB, Ryu JM, Jung JK, Kim JH (2009) High-level production of lycopene in metabolically engineered E. coli. Process Biochem 44:899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cranenburgh RM, Lewis KS, Hanak JA (2004) Effect of plasmid copy number and lac operator sequence on antibiotic-free plasmid selection by operator-repressor titration in Escherichia coli. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 7:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chakravartty V, Cronan JE (2015) A series of medium and high copy number arabinose-inducible Escherichia coli expression vectors compatible with pBR322 and pACYC184. Plasmid 81:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jin W, Xu X, Jiang L, Zhang Z, Li S, Huang H (2015) Putative carotenoid genes expressed under the regulation of Shine-Dalgarno regions in Escherichia coli for efficient lycopene production. Biotechnol Lett 37:2303–2310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tao L, Jackson RE, Rouvière PE, Cheng Q (2005) Isolation of chromosomal mutations that affect carotenoid production in Escherichia coli: mutations alter copy number of ColE1-type plasmids. FEMS Microbiol Lett 243:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ryan W, Parulekar SJ (1991) Recombinant protein synthesis and plasmid instability in continuous cultures of Escherichia coli JM103 harboring a high copy number plasmid. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pushnova EA, Geier M, Zhu YS (2000) An easy and accurate agarose gel assay for quantitation of bacterial plasmid copy numbers. Anal Biochem 284:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Silva F, Queiroz JA, Domingues FC (2012) Evaluating metabolic stress and plasmid stability in plasmid DNA production by Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Adv 30:691–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kramer MG (2016) Determination of plasmid segregational stability in a growing bacterial population. Bact Ther Cancer Methods Protoc 1409:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Karim AS, Curran KA, Alper HS (2013) Characterization of plasmid burden and copy number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for optimization of metabolic engineering applications. FEMS Yeast Res 13:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gruber DF, Pieribone VA, Porton B, Kao H-T (2008) Strict regulation of gene expression from a high-copy plasmid utilizing a dual vector system. Protein Expr Purif 60:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thakker C, Zhu J, San K-Y, Bennett G (2011) Heterologous pyc gene expression under various natural and engineered promoters in Escherichia coli for improved succinate production. J Biotechnol 155:236–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Martin VJ, Pitera DJ, Withers ST, Newman JD, Keasling JD (2003) Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nature Biotechnol 21:796–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jones KL, Kim S-W, Keasling J (2000) Low-copy plasmids can perform as well as or better than high-copy plasmids for metabolic engineering of bacteria. Metab Eng 2:328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang Z, Xiang L, Shao J, Węgrzyn A, Węgrzyn G (2006) Effects of the presence of ColE1 plasmid DNA in Escherichia coli on the host cell metabolism. Microb Cell Fact 5:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yoon S-H, Lee S-H, Das A, Ryu H-K, Jang H-J, Kim J-Y, Oh D-K, Keasling JD, Kim S-W (2009) Combinatorial expression of bacterial whole mevalonate pathway for the production of β-carotene in E. coli. J Biotechnol 140:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lee PC, Mijts BN, Schmidt-Dannert C (2004) Investigation of factors influencing production of the monocyclic carotenoid torulene in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:538–546Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shi J, Dai Y, Kakuda Y, Mittal G, Xue SJ (2008) Effect of heating and exposure to light on the stability of lycopene in tomato puree. Food Control 19:514–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Giannakis S, Rtimi S, Darakas E, Escalas-Cañellas A, Pulgarin C (2015) Light wavelength-dependent E. coli survival changes after simulated solar disinfection of secondary effluent. Photochem Photobiol Sci 14:2238–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Murmu J, Chinthapalli B, Raghavendra AS (2003) Light activation of NADP malic enzyme in leaves of maize: marginal increase in activity, but marked change in regulatory properties of enzyme. J Plant Physiol 160:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ruiz-Hidalgo M, Benito E, Sandmann G, Eslava A (1997) The phytoene dehydrogenase gene of Phycomyces: regulation of its expression by blue light and vitamin A. Mol Gen Genet MGG 253:734–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical EngineeringNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Pharmaceutical SciencesNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Institute of Microbiology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesUrumqiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.College of Food Science and Light IndustryNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations