Abstract
Despite the growing importance of the Pichia pastoris expression system as industrial workhorse, the literature is almost absent in systematic studies on how culture medium composition affects central carbon fluxes and heterologous protein expression. In this study we investigate how 26 variations of the BSM+PTM1 medium impact central carbon fluxes and protein expression in a P. pastoris X-33 strain expressing a single-chain antibody fragment. To achieve this goal, we adopted a hybrid metabolic flux analysis (MFA) methodology, which is a modification of standard MFA to predict the rate of synthesis of recombinant proteins. Hybrid MFA combines the traditional parametric estimation of central carbon fluxes with non-parametric statistical modeling of product-related quantitative or qualitative measurements as a function of central carbon fluxes. It was observed that protein yield variability was 53.6 % (relative standard deviation) among the different experiments. Protein yield is much more sensitive to medium composition than biomass growth, which is mainly determined by the carbon source availability and main salts. Hybrid MFA was able to describe accurately the protein yield with normalized RMSE of 6.3 % over 5 independent experiments. The metabolic state that promotes high protein yields is characterized by high overall metabolic rates through main central carbon pathways concomitantly with a relative shift of carbon flux from biosynthetic towards energy generating pathways.







Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Abbreviations
- MFA:
-
Metabolic flux analysis
- PLS:
-
Partial least squares
- LV:
-
Latent variable
- RMSE:
-
Root mean squared error
- nRMSE:
-
Normalized root mean squared error
- DCW:
-
Dry cell weight
- MFD:
-
Metabolic flux distribution
- EMP:
-
Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas
- PPP:
-
Pentose phosphate pathway
- TCA:
-
Tricarboxylic acid cycle
References
Ahmad M, Hirz M, Pichler H, Schwab H (2014) Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:5301–5317
Cereghino GPL, Cereghino JL, Ilgen C, Cregg JM (2002) Production of recombinant proteins in fermenter cultures of the yeast Pichia pastoris. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:329–332
Heyland J, Fu J, Blank LM, Schmid A (2010) Quantitative physiology of Pichia pastoris during glucose-limited high-cell density fed-batch cultivation for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Bioeng 107:357–368
Cregg JM, Vedvick TS, Raschke WC (1993) Recent advances in the expression of foreign genes in Pichia pastoris. Nat Biotechnol 11:905–910
Hagman A, Säll T, Piškur J (2014) Analysis of the yeast short-term Crabtree effect and its origin. FEBS J 281:4805–4814
Tschopp JF, Brust PF, Cregg JM et al (1987) Expression of the lacZ gene from two methanol-regulated promoters in Pichia pastoris. Nucleic Acids Res 15:3859–3876
Waterham HR, Digan ME, Koutz PJ et al (1997) Isolation of the Pichia pastoris glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene and regulation and use of its promoter. Gene 186:37–44
Vogl T, Glieder A (2013) Regulation of Pichia pastoris promoters and its consequences for protein production. N Biotechnol 30:385–404
Mattanovich D, Callewaert N, Rouze P et al (2009) Open access to sequence: browsing the Pichia pastoris genome. Microb Cell Fact 8:53
Chung BK, Selvarasu S, Andrea C et al (2010) Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction and in silico analysis of methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris for strain improvement. Microb Cell Fact 9:50
Sohn SB, Graf AB, Kim TY et al (2010) Genome-scale metabolic model of methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris and its use for in silico analysis of heterologous protein production. Biotechnol J 5:705–715
Baumann K, Carnicer M, Dragosits M et al (2010) A multi-level study of recombinant Pichia pastoris in different oxygen conditions. BMC Syst Biol 4:141
Dragosits M, Stadlmann J, Albiol J et al (2009) The effect of temperature on the proteome of recombinant Pichia pastoris. J Proteome Res 8:1380–1392
Unrean P (2014) Pathway analysis of Pichia pastoris to elucidate methanol metabolism and its regulation for production of recombinant proteins. Biotechnol Prog 30:28–37
Jordà J, Jouhten P, Cámara E et al (2012) Metabolic flux profiling of recombinant protein secreting Pichia pastoris growing on glucose:methanol mixtures. Microb Cell Fact 11:57
González-Martínez JM, Folch-Fortuny A, Llaneras F et al (2014) Metabolic flux understanding of Pichia pastoris grown on heterogenous culture media. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 134:89–99
Tortajada M, Llaneras F, Ramón D, Picó J (2012) Estimation of recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris based on a constraint-based model. J Process Control 22:1139–1151
Tortajada M, Llaneras F, Picó J (2010) Validation of a constraint-based model of Pichia pastoris metabolism under data scarcity. BMC Syst Biol 4:115
Carinhas N, Bernal V, Teixeira A et al (2011) Hybrid metabolic flux analysis: combining stoichiometric and statistical constraints to model the formation of complex recombinant products. BMC Syst Biol 5:34
Ferreira AR, Ataíde F, von Stosch M et al (2012) Application of adaptive DO-stat feeding control to Pichia pastoris X33 cultures expressing a single chain antibody fragment (scFv). Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:1603–1614
Ferreira AR, Dias JML, von Stosch M et al (2013) Fast development of Pichia pastoris GS115 Mut(+) cultures employing batch-to-batch control and hybrid semi-parametric modeling. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. doi:10.1007/s00449-013-1029-9
Jahic M, Rotticci-Mulder JC, Martinelle M et al (2002) Modeling of growth and energy metabolism of Pichia pastoris producing a fusion protein. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 24:385–393
Wang NS, Stephanopoulos G (1983) Application of macroscopic balances to the identification of gross measurement errors. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:2177–2208
Van der Heijden RT, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C et al (1994) Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems: I. Classification of the calculability and the balanceability of conversion rates. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:3–10
Klamt S, Schuster S, Gilles ED (2002) Calculability analysis in underdetermined metabolic networks illustrated by a model of the central metabolism in purple nonsulfur bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:734–751
Geladi P, Kowalski BR (1986) Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185:1–17
Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L (2001) PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 58:109–130
d’Anjou MC, Daugulis AJ (2000) Mixed-feed exponential feeding for fed-batch culture of recombinant methylotrophic yeast. Biotechnol Lett 22:341–346
Brady CP, Shimp RL, Miles AP et al (2001) High-level production and purification of P30P2MSP1(19), an important vaccine antigen for malaria, expressed in the methylotropic yeast Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif 23:468–475
Carnicer M, Baumann K, Töplitz I et al (2009) Macromolecular and elemental composition analysis and extracellular metabolite balances of Pichia pastoris growing at different oxygen levels. Microb Cell Fact 8:65
Heyland J, Fu J, Blank LM, Schmid A (2011) Carbon metabolism limits recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:1942–1953
Nocon J, Steiger MG, Pfeffer M et al (2014) Model based engineering of Pichia pastoris central metabolism enhances recombinant protein production. Metab Eng 24:129–138
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this work was provided by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through individual grant SFRH/BD/70768/2010 and project grant PTDC/BBB-BSS/2800/2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isidro, I.A., Portela, R.M., Clemente, J.J. et al. Hybrid metabolic flux analysis and recombinant protein prediction in Pichia pastoris X-33 cultures expressing a single-chain antibody fragment. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 1351–1363 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1611-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1611-z


