Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of nitrogen substrate limitation on Escherichia coli’s growth by parameter identification tools

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (CNR) has shown to be a relevant factor in microorganisms growth and metabolites production. It is usual that this factor compromises the productivity yield of different microorganisms. However, CNR has been rarely modeled and therefore the nature of its specific influence on metabolites production has not been understood clearly. This paper describes a parametric characterization of the CNR effect on the Escherichia coli metabolism. A set of parameters was proposed to introduce a mathematical model that considers the biomass, substrate and several byproducts dynamical behavior under batch regimen and CNR influence. Identification algorithm used to calculate the parameters considers a novel least mean square strategy that formalizes the CNR influence in E. coli metabolism. This scheme produced a step-by-step method that was suitable for obtaining the set of parameters that describes the model. This method was evaluated under two scenarios: (a) using the data from a set of numerical simulations where the model was tested under the presence of artificial noises and (b) the information obtained from a set of experiments under different CNR. In both cases, a leave-one-experiment-out cross-validation study was considered to evaluate the model prediction capabilities. Feasibility of the parametric identification method was proven in both considered scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Heeswijk WC, Westerhoff H, Boogerd FC (2013) Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77(4):628–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reitzer L (2003) Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:155–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Falkowski PG, Raven JA (2007) Aquatic photosynthesis. PaperBack

  4. Zhang L, He M, Liu J (2014) The enhancement mechanism of hydrogen photoproduction in chlorella protothecoides under nitrogen limitation and sulfur deprivation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39(17):89698976

    Google Scholar 

  5. Niessen J, Harnisch F, Rosenbaum M, Schroder U, Scholz F (2006) Heat treated soil as convenient and versatile source of bacterial communities for microbial electricity generation. Electrochem Commun 8:869–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baez A, Cho KM, Liao JC (2011) High-flux isobutanol production using engineered Escherichia coli: a bioreactor study with in situ product removal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90(5):1681–1690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikeda M, Arai K, Masai H (1996) Ctbp1/rbp1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein which binds to t-rich single-stranded DNA containing the 11-bp core sequence of autonomously replicating sequence, is a poly(deoxypyrimidine)-binding protein. Eur J Biochem 238(1):38–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsson C, Nilsson A, Blomberg A, Gustafsson L (1997) Glycolytic flux is conditionally correlated with ATP concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a chemostat study under carbon- or nitrogen-limiting conditions. J Bacteriol 179(23):7243–7250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Geider RJ, MacIntyre HL, Kana TM (1998) A dynamic regulatory model of phytoplanktonic acclimation to light, nutrients, and temperature. Limnol Oceanogr 43(4):679–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Faugeras B, Bernard O, Sciandra A, Levy M (2004) A mechanistic modelling and data assimilation approach to estimate the carbon/chlorophyll and carbon/nitrogen ratios in a coupled hydrodynamical-biological model. Nonlinear Process Geophys 11:515–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pahlow M, Dietze H, Oschlies A (2013) Optimality-based model of phytoplankton growth and diazotrophy. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 489:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernard O, Queinnec I (2008) Dynamic models of biochemical processes: properties of the models. Hermes Science, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ross ON, Geider RJ (2009) New cell-based model of photosynthesis and photo-acclimation: accumulation and mobilisation of energy reserves in phytoplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 383:53–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Christenson L, Sims R (2011) Production and harvesting of microalgae for wastewater treatment, biofuels, and bioproducts. Biotechnol Adv 25:686–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thamsiriroj T, Murphy JD (2011) Modelling mono-digestion of grass silage in a 2-stage CSTR anaerobic digester using ADM1. Bioresour Technol 102(2):948–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boe K, Angelidaki I (2009) Serial CSTR digester configuration for improving biogas production from manure. Water Res 43(1):166–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibon-Fargeot AM, Celle-Couenne F, Hammouri H (2000) Cascade estimation design for CSTR models. Comput Chem Eng 24(11):2355–2566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. El Mansi EMT, Holms WH (1989) Control of carbon flux to acetate excretion during growth of Escherichia coli in batch and continuous cultures. J Gen Microbiol 135(11):2875–2883

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Chairez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rios-Lozano, M., Guerrero-Torres, V., Badillo-Corona, A. et al. Characterization of nitrogen substrate limitation on Escherichia coli’s growth by parameter identification tools. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 1151–1161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1591-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1591-z

Keywords

Navigation