Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization, optimization, and scale-up of cellulases production by trichoderma reesei cbs 836.91 in solid-state fermentation using agro-industrial products

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

The application of cellulases in saccharification processes is restricted by its production cost. Consequently, new fungal strains able to elaborate higher cellulases titers and with special activity profiles are required to make the process economical. The aim of this investigation was to find a promising wild-type Trichoderma strain for cellulases production. The Trichoderma reesei strain 938 (CBS 836.91) was selected among twenty strains on the basis of cellulase-agar-plate screening. Evaluation of the selected strain on six solid substrates indicated the highest activities to be obtained from wheat bran. Statistical analyses of the experimental design indicated a significant effect of pH and moisture on the generation of endoglucanase (EGA) and filter-paper (FPA) activity. Furthermore, a central-composite design-based optimization revealed that pH values between 6.4 and 6.6 and moisture from 74 to 94 % were optimal for cellulases production. Under these conditions, 8–10 IU gds−1 of FPA and 15.6–17.8 IU gds−1 of EGA were obtained. In addition, cultivation in a rotating-drum reactor under optimal conditions gave 8.2 IU gds−1 FPA and 13.5 IU gds−1 EGA. Biochemical characterization of T. reesei 938 cellulases indicated a substantially higher resistance to 4 mM Fe+2 and a slightly greater tolerance to alkaline pH in comparison to Celluclast®. These results suggest that T. reesei 938 could be a promising candidate for improved cellulases production through direct-evolution strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Baldrian P, Val V (2008) Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00106.x

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A (2011) Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme Res. doi:10.4061/2011/280696

    Google Scholar 

  3. Persson I, Tjerneld F, Hahn-h B (1991) Fungal cellulolytic enzyme production : a Review. Process Biochem 26:65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Canilha L, Chandel AK, dos Santos Milessi TS et al (2012) Bioconversion of sugarcane biomass into ethanol: an overview about composition, pretreatment methods, detoxification of hydrolysates, enzymatic saccharification, and ethanol fermentation. J Biomed Biotechnol. doi:10.1155/2012/989572

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dhillon GS, Oberoi HS, Kaur S et al (2011) Value-addition of agricultural wastes for augmented cellulase and xylanase production through solid-state tray fermentation employing mixed-culture of fungi. Ind Crops Prod 34:1160–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xin F, Geng A (2010) Horticultural waste as the substrate for cellulase and hemicellulase production by Trichoderma reesei under solid-state fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:295–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandhu SK, Oberoi HS, Babbar N et al (2013) Two-stage statistical medium optimization for augmented cellulase production via solid-state fermentation by newly isolated Aspergillus niger HN-1 and application of crude cellulase consortium in hydrolysis of rice straw. J Agric Food Chem 61:12653–12661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun H, Ge X, Hao Z, Peng M (2010) Cellulase production by Trichoderma sp. on apple pomace under solid state fermentation. Afr J Biotechnol 9:163–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Yang J (2007) Cellulase production by Trichoderma koningii AS3. 4262 in solid-state fermentation using lignocellulosic waste from the vinegar industry. Food Technol Biotechnol 9862:420–425

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gokhale DV, Puntambekar US, Deobagkar DN, Peberdy JF (1988) Production of celulolytic enzymes by mutants of Aspergillus niger. Enzym Microb Technol 10:442–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Delabona PDS, Pirota RDPB, Codima CA et al (2013) Effect of initial moisture content on two Amazon rainforest Aspergillus strains cultivated on agro-industrial residues: biomass-degrading enzymes production and characterization. Ind Crops Prod 42:236–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chahal DS (1985) Solid-state fermentation with Trichoderma reesei for cellulase production. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:205–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Yang H, Roy B et al (2010) Enhanced cellulase production of the Trichoderma viride mutated by microwave and ultraviolet. Microbiol Res 165:190–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson R, Nevalainen H (2012) Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30—thirty years of strain improvement. Microbiology. doi:10.1099/mic.0.054031-0

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pensupa N, Jin M, Kokolski M et al (2013) A solid state fungal fermentation-based strategy for the hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 149:261–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mekala NK, Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A (2008) Cellulase production under solid-state fermentation by Trichoderma reesei RUT C30: statistical optimization of process parameters. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151:122–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Druzhinina IS, Komoń-Zelazowska M, Atanasova L et al (2010) Evolution and ecophysiology of the industrial producer Hypocrea jecorina (Anamorph Trichoderma reesei) and a new sympatric agamospecies related to it. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009191

    Google Scholar 

  18. Florencio C, Couri S, Farinas CS (2012) Correlation between agar plate screening and solid-state fermentation for the prediction of cellulase production by Trichoderma strains. Enzyme Res 2012:793708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Percival Zhang Y-H, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR (2006) Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24:452–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A (2004) Microplate-based filter paper assay to measure total cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:832–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A (2005) Microplate-based carboxymethylcellulose assay for endoglucanase activity. Anal Biochem 342:176–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Steppan DD, Werner J, Yeater RP (1998) Essential Regression. http://www.jowerner.homepage.t-online.de/. Accessed 21 May 2014

  23. Gao D, Chundawat SPS, Krishnan C et al (2010) Mixture optimization of six core glycosyl hydrolases for maximizing saccharification of ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 101:2770–2781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim E, Irwin D, Walker L, Wilson D (1998) Factorial optimization of a six-cellulase mixture. Biotechnol Bioeng 58:494–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Debing J, Peijun L, Stagnitti F et al (2006) Pectinase production by solid fermentation from Aspergillus niger by a new prescription experiment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 64:244–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A (2007) Improved cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei RUT C30 under SSF through process optimization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142:60–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Deshpande SK, Bhotmange MG, Chakrabarti T, Shastri PN (2008) Production of cellulase and xylanase by Trichoderma reesei (QM 9414 mutant), Aspergillus niger and mixed culture by solid state fermentation (SSF) of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Indian J Chem Technol 15:449–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guoweia S, Man H, Shikai W, He C (2011) Effect of some factors on production of cellulase by Trichoderma reesei HY07. Procedia Environ Sci 8:357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell DA, Berovič M, Krieger N (2006) Solid-state fermentation bioreactors: fundamentals of design and operation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang G, Zhang X, Wang L et al (2012) The activity and kinetic properties of cellulases in substrates containing metal ions and acid radicals. Adv Biol Chem 2012:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tejirian A, Xu F (2010) Inhibition of cellulase-catalyzed lignocellulosic hydrolysis by iron and oxidative metal ions and complexes. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7673–7682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tao Y-M, Zhu X-Z, Huang J-Z et al (2010) Purification and properties of endoglucanase from a sugar cane bagasse hydrolyzing strain, Aspergillus glaucus XC9. J Agric Food Chem 58:6126–6130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Irina Druzhinina (Technological University of Vienna, Austria) for generously providing the Trichoderma reesei and Trichoderma parareesei strains employed in these investigations. This work was supported by an IDB OC/AR loan with a PICT start-up 2010-1312 grant from the FONCyT–MinCyT of Argentina (issued to E. Albertó) and the PGSYS program (issued to M. Fernández-Lahore). Dr. Donald F. Haggerty, a retired career investigator and native English speaker, edited the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gastón E. Ortiz.

Additional information

E. O. Albertó, M. Fernández-Lahore, M. Blasco equally contributed to this work as co-senior authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortiz, G.E., Guitart, M.E., Cavalitto, S.F. et al. Characterization, optimization, and scale-up of cellulases production by trichoderma reesei cbs 836.91 in solid-state fermentation using agro-industrial products. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 2117–2128 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1451-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1451-2

Keywords

Navigation