Impacts of retrofitting analysis on first generation ethanol production: process design and techno-economics
- 439 Downloads
More than half of the bioethanol plants in operation today use corn or grains as raw materials. The downstream processing of mash after fermentation to produce ethanol and distiller grains is an energy-demanding process, which needs retrofitting for optimization. In addition, the fluctuation in the ethanol and grain prices affects the overall profitability of the plant. For this purpose, a process simulation was performed in Aspen Plus® based on an existing industrial plant located in Sweden. The simulations were compared using different scenarios including different concentrations of ethanol, using the stillage for biogas production to produce steam instead of distiller grains as a by-product, and altering the purity of the ethanol produced. Using stillage for biogas production, as well as utilizing the steam, reduced the overall energy consumption by 40 % compared to the plant in operation. The fluctuations in grain prices had a high impact on the net present value (NPV), where grain prices greater than 349 USD/ton reached a zero NPV. After 20 years, the plant in operation producing 41,600 tons ethanol/year can generate a profit of 78 million USD. Compared to the base case, the less purified ethanol resulted in a lower NPV of 30 million USD.
KeywordsProcess design Retrofitting analysis Ethanol Aspen plus Techno-economic analysis
Dried distillers grains with soluble
Net present value
Cumulative cash position
Non -fermentable dissolved solids
The authors would like to thank the Swedish Energy Agency for their financial support and Lantmännen Agroetanol AB, Sweden for sharing the data of the plant. We also acknowledge Thomas Södergren for his computer support.
- 2.Global Agricultural Information Network (2012) Biofuels annual report 2012. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
- 3.Renewable Fuels Association (2014). http://www.ethanolrfa.org/. Accessed 07 May 2014
- 5.Food and Agricultural Organization (2012) FAOSTATGoogle Scholar
- 6.International energy statistics (2011) Fuel ethanol statistics. In: US Energy information administrationGoogle Scholar
- 12.Elander RT, Putsche VL (1996) Ethanol from corn: technology and economics. In: Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. pp 329–349Google Scholar
- 17.Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D (2012) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H, Galvez A (1999) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis current and futuristic scenarios. In: DTIC documentGoogle Scholar