Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 389–397 | Cite as

Impacts of retrofitting analysis on first generation ethanol production: process design and techno-economics

  • Karthik Rajendran
  • Sreevathsava Rajoli
  • Oliver Teichert
  • Mohammad J. Taherzadeh
Original Paper

Abstract

More than half of the bioethanol plants in operation today use corn or grains as raw materials. The downstream processing of mash after fermentation to produce ethanol and distiller grains is an energy-demanding process, which needs retrofitting for optimization. In addition, the fluctuation in the ethanol and grain prices affects the overall profitability of the plant. For this purpose, a process simulation was performed in Aspen Plus® based on an existing industrial plant located in Sweden. The simulations were compared using different scenarios including different concentrations of ethanol, using the stillage for biogas production to produce steam instead of distiller grains as a by-product, and altering the purity of the ethanol produced. Using stillage for biogas production, as well as utilizing the steam, reduced the overall energy consumption by 40 % compared to the plant in operation. The fluctuations in grain prices had a high impact on the net present value (NPV), where grain prices greater than 349 USD/ton reached a zero NPV. After 20 years, the plant in operation producing 41,600 tons ethanol/year can generate a profit of 78 million USD. Compared to the base case, the less purified ethanol resulted in a lower NPV of 30 million USD.

Keywords

Process design Retrofitting analysis Ethanol Aspen plus Techno-economic analysis 

Abbreviations

DDGS

Dried distillers grains with soluble

TS

Total solids

NPV

Net present value

PBP

Payback period

CCP

Cumulative cash position

NFDS

Non -fermentable dissolved solids

References

  1. 1.
    Bothast RJ, Schlicher MA (2005) Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67(1):19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Global Agricultural Information Network (2012) Biofuels annual report 2012. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Renewable Fuels Association (2014). http://www.ethanolrfa.org/. Accessed 07 May 2014
  4. 4.
    Pieragostini C, Aguirre P, Mussati MC (2014) Life cycle assessment of corn-based ethanol production in Argentina. Sci Total Environ 472:212–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Food and Agricultural Organization (2012) FAOSTATGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    International energy statistics (2011) Fuel ethanol statistics. In: US Energy information administrationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkis D, Tyner W, Dale R (2008) Economic analysis of a modified dry grind ethanol process with recycle of pretreated and enzymatically hydrolyzed distillers’ grains. Bioresour Technol 99(12):5243–5249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim Y, Mosier N, Ladisch MR (2008) Process simulation of modified dry grind ethanol plant with recycle of pretreated and enzymatically hydrolyzed distillers’ grains. Bioresour Technol 99(12):5177–5192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwiatkowski JR, McAloon AJ, Taylor F, Johnston DB (2006) Modeling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process. Ind Crops Prod 23(3):288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arifeen N, Wang R, Kookos IK, Webb C, Koutinas AA (2007) Process design and optimization of novel wheat-based continuous bioethanol production system. Biotechnol Prog 23(6):1394–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quintero JA, Montoya MI, Sánchez OJ, Giraldo OH, Cardona CA (2008) Fuel ethanol production from sugarcane and corn: comparative analysis for a Colombian case. Energy 33(3):385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elander RT, Putsche VL (1996) Ethanol from corn: technology and economics. In: Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. pp 329–349Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Tagore S, Turhollow AF (2010) Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant-part 1: cost of feedstock supply logistics. Biomass Bioenergy 34(1):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu K, Barrows FT (2013) Methods to recover value-added coproducts from dry grind processing of grains into fuel ethanol. J Agric Food Chem 61(30):7325–7332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajendran K, Kankanala HR, Lundin M, Taherzadeh MJ (2014) A novel process simulation model (PSM) for anaerobic digestion using Aspen Plus. Bioresour Technol 168:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajendran K, Kankanala HR, Martinsson R, Taherzadeh MJ (2014) Uncertainty over techno-economic potentials of biogas from municipal solid waste (MSW): a case study on an industrial process. Appl Energy 125:84–92. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Bhattacharyya D (2012) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J (1999) Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol Prog 15(5):794–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H, Galvez A (1999) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis current and futuristic scenarios. In: DTIC documentGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lang X, Macdonald DG, Hill GA (2001) Recycle bioreactor for bioethanol production from wheat starch II. Fermentation and economics. Energy Sources 23(5):427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barta Z, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010) Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karthik Rajendran
    • 1
  • Sreevathsava Rajoli
    • 1
  • Oliver Teichert
    • 2
  • Mohammad J. Taherzadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Swedish Centre for Resource RecoveryUniversity of BoråsBoråsSweden
  2. 2.Lantmännen Agroetanol ABNorrköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations