Comparing in situ removal strategies for improving styrene bioproduction
- 959 Downloads
As an important conventional monomer compound, the biological production of styrene carries significant promise with respect to creating novel sustainable materials. Since end-product toxicity presently limits styrene production by previously engineered Escherichia coli, in situ product removal by both solvent extraction and gas stripping were explored as process-based strategies for circumventing its inhibitory effects. In solvent extraction, the addition of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate offered the greatest productivity enhancement, allowing net volumetric production of 836 ± 64 mg/L to be reached, representing a 320 % improvement over single-phase cultures. Gas stripping rates, meanwhile, were controlled by rates of bioreactor agitation and, to a greater extent, aeration. A periodic gas stripping protocol ultimately enabled up to 561 ± 15 mg/L styrene to be attained. Lastly, by relieving the effects of styrene toxicity, new insight was gained regarding subsequent factors limiting its biosynthesis in E. coli and strategies for future strain improvement are discussed.
KeywordsStyrene In situ product recovery Gas stripping Solvent extraction
This work was supported by start-up funds from Arizona State University. M.M. was supported by funding from the Fulton Undergraduate Research Initiative (FURI) at Arizona State University. R.M. was supported by Fellowships from ARCS and PEO International.
- 5.Yim H, Haselbeck R, Niu W, Pujol-Baxley C, Burgard A, Boldt J, Khandurina J, Trawick JD, Osterhout RE, Stephen R, Estadilla J, Teisan S, Schreyer HB, Andrae S, Yang TH, Lee SY, Burk MJ, Van Dien S (2011) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1,4-butanediol. Nat Chem Biol 7:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.James DH, Castor WM (2011) Styrene. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.SRI (2010) Styrene. Access Intelligence LLC Inc, RockwilleGoogle Scholar
- 39.Nienow AW (1990) Gas dispersion performance in fermenter operation. Chem Eng Prog 86:61–71Google Scholar
- 40.Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1986) Biochemical engineering fundamentals, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 42.Panke S, Meyer A, Huber CM, Witholt B, Wubbolts MG (1999) An alkane-responsive expression system for the production of fine chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2324–2332Google Scholar
- 48.Ramos J-L (2004) Pseudomonas. Biosynthesis of macromolecules and molecular metabolism, vol 3. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- 49.Tribe DE (1987) Novel microorganism and method. US Patent 4,681,852Google Scholar
- 52.Olaofe OA, Fenner CJ, Gudiminchi RK, Smit MS, Harrison STL (2013) The influence of microbial physiology on biocatalyst activity and efficiency in the terminal hydroxylation of n-octane using Escherichia coli expressing the alkane hydroxylase, CYP153A6. Microb Cell Factories 12Google Scholar
- 53.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA on-line tools for site assessment calculation. http://www.epa.gov/athens/learn2model/part-two/onsite/esthenry.html