Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement and mathematical modelling of competition between fast- and slow-growing ordinary heterotrophic organisms in low and high substrate-loaded systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) of an activated sludge wastewater treatment system showed an atypical growth behaviour when they are inoculated to batch aerobic growth tests with a high substrate-loaded condition. For example, the OHO maximum specific growth rates on readily biodegradable substrates (μ H) increased with a high ratio of substrate concentration to OHO active biomass concentration (So/Xo), although they were assumed to be constant in a conventional microbial growth kinetic model with a single OHO population group. We, therefore, set a hypothesis in that the change of OHO maximum specific growth rates in the batch test condition is caused by turnover of fast-growing OHO population against slow-growing OHO population. And, a competitive microbial growth kinetic model of the fast- and slow-growing OHO population groups was developed and validated with model-data fitting analysis for the batch test results. The competitive microbial growth kinetic model of process selection, rather than that of kinetic selection, was capable of simulating microbial growth kinetics in high substrate-loaded dynamic systems (i.e., batch tests) and low substrate-loaded steady-state systems (i.e., continuously operated wastewater treatment systems), better than the conventional non-competitive growth kinetic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AO:

Autotrophic organism

COD:

Chemical oxygen demand (mg/l)

RBCOD:

Readily biodegradable COD

SBCOD:

Slowly biodegradable COD

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

MLE:

Modified Ludzack–Ettinger

OHO:

Ordinary heterotrophic organism

OUR:

Oxygen uptake rate

OURH OUROHO :

Oxygen uptake rate by OHOs

OURAO :

Oxygen uptake rate by AOs

TKN:

Total Kieldahl nitrogen (mg/l)

TSS:

Total suspended solids (mg/l)

VSS:

Volatile suspended solids (mg/l)

MLAVSS:

Mixed liquor active biomass in volatile suspended solid (mgVSS/l)

UCT:

University of Cape Town

b HT :

OHO specific death rate at temperature T; 0.62/days at 20 °C, COD unit

b HT* :

Specific endogenous mass loss rate at temperature T; 0.24/days at 20 °C, VSS unit

f av :

Fraction of OHO active biomass in the mixed liquor volatile suspended solids [(MLA)VSS/VSS]

f CV :

COD to VSS ratio of mixed liquor organic suspended solids (COD/VSS)

f E :

Fraction of OHO active biomass as endogenous residue (COD/COD)

f *E :

Fraction of OHO active biomasss as endogenous residue (VSS/VSS)

f MA :

Maximum ratio S ads/Z BH at saturation

f N :

TKN to VSS ratio of mixed liquor organic suspended solids (TKN/VSS)

f S,up :

Fraction of substrates, unbiodegradable and particulate (COD/COD)

f S,us :

Fraction of substrate, unbiodegradable and soluble (COD/COD)

K A :

Specific adsorption rate of S enm on OHO active biomass

K MP :

Maximum specific growth rate of OHO active biomass with S ads

K SP :

Half saturation coefficient with OHO active biomass on S ads

K SH :

Half saturation coefficient of Monod growth kinetics with RBCOD (S bs)

K SH1 :

Half saturation coefficient for fast-growing OHO active biomass with RBCOD (S bs)

K SH2 :

Half-saturation coeff. for slow-growing OHO active biomass with RBCOD (S bs)

R S :

System sludge age (days)

So:

Substrate concentration (mgCOD/l)

S ads1 :

Slowly biodegradable substrate, adsorbed on fast-growing OHOs (mgCOD/l)

S ads2 :

Slowly biodegradable substrate, adsorbed on slowly growing OHOs (mgCOD/l)

S enm :

Slowly biodegradable substrate, enmeshed in OHO active biomass (mgCOD/l)

S bs :

Readily biodegradable (soluble) substrate (mgCOD/l)

S us :

Unbiodegradable soluble substrate (mgCOD/l)

µ H :

Maximum specific growth rate of OHO active biomass with RBCOD (S bs)

µ H1 :

Maximum specific growth rate of fast-growing OHOs with RBCOD (S bs)

µ H2 :

Maximum specific growth rate of slowly growing OHOs with RBCOD (S bs)

Xo:

Active biomass concentration [mg(MLA)VSS/l]

X BH1 :

Fast-growing OHO active biomass concentration [mg(MLA)VSS/l]

X BH2 :

Slow-growing OHO active biomass concentration [mg(MLA)VSS/l]

Y ZH :

Yield coefficient of OHO active biomass (COD/COD)

Y *H :

Yield coefficient of OHO active biomass (VSS/COD)

Z BH(0) :

OHO active biomass concentration (mgCOD/l)

Z BH1(0) :

Fast-growing OHO active biomass concentration (mgCOD/l)

Z BH2(0) :

Slowly growing OHO active biomass concentration (mgCOD/l)

Z BH1(Inf) :

Fast-growing OHO active biomass concentration in raw sewage (mgCOD/l)

References

  1. Chudoba P, Capdeville B, Chudoba J (1992) Explanation of biological meaning of the So/Xo ratio in batch cultivation. Water Sci Technol 26:743–751

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Novak L, Larrea L, Wanner J (1994) Estimation of maximum specific growth rate of heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass: a combined technique of mathematical modelling and batch cultivations. Water Sci Technol 30:171–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grady C, Smets B, Barbeau D (1996) Variability in kinetic parameter estimates: a review of possible causes and a proposed terminology. Water Res 30:742–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pollard P, Steffens M, Biggs C, Lant P (1998) Bacterial growth dynamics in activated sludge batch assays. Water Res 32:587–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh S, Pohland F (1972) Kinetic of assimilation multiple substates in dispersed growth systems. Water Res 6:99–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pitter P, Chudoba J (1990) Biodegradability of organic substances in aquatic environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daigger G, Grady C (1982) The dynamics of microbial growth on soluble substrate. Water Res 16:365–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee B, Wentzel M, Ekama G (2003) Batch test for measurment of ordinary heterotrophic active mass in activated sludge mixed liquor. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa

  9. Beeharry A, Wentzel M, Ekama G (2001) Evaluation of batch test for measurement of active biomass in activated sludge mixed liquor. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa

  10. Cronje G, Wentzel M, Ekama G (2000) Measurement of active heterogrophic organism concentration in the nitrification-denitrification activated sludge systems. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa

  11. WRC (1984) Theory, design and operation of nutrient removal activated sludge processes. Water Research Commission, PO Box 824, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

  12. Henze M, van Loosdrecht M, Ekama G, Brdjanovic D (2008) Wastewater treatment: principles, design and modelling. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Randall E, Wilkinson A, Ekama G (1991) An instrument for the direct determination of oxygen utilization rate. Water SA 17:11–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wentzel M, Ubisi M, Ekama G (1998) Heterotrophic active biomass component of activated sludge mixed liquor. Water Sci Technol 37:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wentzel M, Mbewe A, Ekama G (1995) Batch test for measurement of readily biodegradable COD and active organism concentrations in municipal wastewaters. Water SA 21:117–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chudoba J, Grau P, Ottova V (1973) Control of activated sludge filamentous bulking—II. Selection of micro-organisms by means of a selector. Water Res 7:1389–1406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rittmann B (1996) How input active biomass affects sludge age and process stability. J Environ Eng 122:4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dold P, Wentzel M, Billing A, et al. (1991) Activated Sludge Simulation Programs. Water Research Commission, PO Box 824, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

  19. Reichert P (1998) AQUASIM 2.0—User Manual. Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland

  20. Blanch H, Clark D (1996) Biochemical Engineering. 270 Madison Avenue, New York, Marcel Dekker

  21. Lee B, Wentzel M, Ekama G (2006) Measurement and modelling of ordinary heterotrophic organism active biomass concentrations in anoxic/aerobic activated sludge mixed liquor. Water Sci Technol 54:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yucesoy E, Ludemann N, Lucas H et al (2012) Protein analysis as a measure of active biomass in activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 65:1483–1489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Water Research Commission, National Research Foundation and Water and Sanitation Services SA (Pty) Ltd, and is published with their permission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Joon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, B.J., Wentzel, M., Ekama, G. et al. Measurement and mathematical modelling of competition between fast- and slow-growing ordinary heterotrophic organisms in low and high substrate-loaded systems. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37, 1577–1590 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1130-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1130-8

Keywords

Navigation