Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydrogen production by immobilized Chlorella vulgaris: optimizing pH, carbon source and light

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of light, pH and organic carbon sources were investigated on hydrogen production by algae. An optical fiber was examined as an internal light source. The optical fiber rendered prolonged lag time and total time of hydrogen production. The optimal pH to produce hydrogen for Chlorella sp. was 8.0. Glucose, fructose, sucrose and malt extract were compared as organic carbon sources. The optimal dose of each carbon source was 5 g/L for maximum hydrogen yield. Sucrose produced the largest hydrogen volume (1,315 ml/L), while the highest production rate (24 ml/L/h) was observed in the presence of fructose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Kosourov S, Patrusheva E, Ghirardi M, Seibert L, Tsygankov M (2007) A comparison of hydrogen photoproduction by sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under different growth conditions. J Biotechnol 128:776–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kovacs K, Maroti G, Rakhely G (2006) A novel approach for biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 31:1460–1468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mallick N (2002) Biotechnological potential of immobilized algae for wastewater N, P and metal removal: a review. Biometals 15:377–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambert GR, Smith GD (1981) Hydrogen uptake by the nitrogen-starved cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica. Arch Biochem Biophys 211:360–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Song W, Rashid N, Choi W, Lee K (2011) Biohydrogen production by immobilized Chlorella sp. using cycles of oxygenic photosynthesis and anaerobiosis. Bioresour Technol 102:8676–8681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Antal T, Lindblad P (2005) Production of H2 by sulphur-deprived cells of the unicellular cyanobacteria Gloeocapsa alpicola and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 during dark incubation with methane or at various extracellular pH. J App Microbiol. 98:114–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guan Y, Deng M, Yu X, Zhang W (2004) Two-stage photo-biological production of hydrogen by marine green alga Platymonas subcordiformis. Biochem Eng J 19:69–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laurinavichene T, Tolstygina I, Tsygankov A (2004) The effect of light intensity on hydrogen production by sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biotechnol. 114:143–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rashid N, Lee K, Mahmood Q (2011) Bio-hydrogen production by Chlorella vulgaris under diverse photoperiods. Bioresour Technol 102:2101–2104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosourov S, Seibert M, Ghirardi M (2003) Effects of extracellular pH on the metabolic pathways in sulfur-deprived, H2-producing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. Plant Cell Physiol 44:146–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Miyahara T, Noike T (2002) Effect of pH on microbial hydrogen fermentation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:694–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Skjanes K, Knutsen G, Kallqvist T, Lindblad P (2008) H2 production from marine and freshwater species of green algae during sulfur deprivation and considerations for bioreactor design. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:511–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsygankov A, Kosourov S, Seibert M, Ghirardi M (2002) Hydrogen photoproduction under continuous illumination by sulfur-deprived, synchronous Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. J Hydrog Energy 27:1239–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Uyar B, Eroglu I, Yucel M, Gundüz U, Turker L (2007) Effect of light intensity, wavelength and illumination protocol on hydrogen production in photobioreactors. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:4670–4677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar N, Das D (2000) Enhancement of hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08. Process Biochem 35:1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbosa MJ, Rocha J, Tramper J, Wijffels R (2001) Acetate as a carbon source for hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria. J Biotechnol 85:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Jin B, Mulcahy D (2008) Impact of carbon and nitrogen sources on hydrogen production by a newly isolated Clostridium butyricum W5. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:4998–5005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Okamoto M, Miyahara T, Mizuno O, Noike T (2000) Biological hydrogen potential of materials characteristic of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. Water Sci Technol 41:25–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Benemann J (2000) Hydrogen production by microalgae. J Appl Phys 12:291–300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Das D, Veziroglu T (2001) Hydrogen production by biological processes, a survey of literature. Int J Hydrog Energy 26:13–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan and a grant from Marine Biotechnology Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kisay Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rashid, N., Lee, K., Han, Ji. et al. Hydrogen production by immobilized Chlorella vulgaris: optimizing pH, carbon source and light. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36, 867–872 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-012-0819-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-012-0819-9

Keywords