Abstract
Pelleting of biomass can increase their bulk density and thus improve storability and reduce transportation costs. The objective of this research was to determine the effects of the pelleting conditions on chemical composition and fermentable sugar yield of the biomass. Corn stover, wheat straw, big bluestem, and sorghum stalks were used for this study. Dilute sulfuric acid was used for biomass pretreatment. Accellerase 1500™ was used for cellulose hydrolysis. Effects of mill screen size, die thickness, and L/D ratio of die on chemical compositions and sugar yield were determined. Glucan content of the biomass was positively affected by die thickness and negatively affected by mill screen size. Opposite trend was observed for xylan content. Wheat straw pellets had the highest sugar yield (92.5–94.1%) and big bluestem pellets had the lowest sugar yield (83.6–91.1%). Optimum pelleting condition is 6.5 mm screen size and 44.5 mm die thickness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dien BS, Jung H-JG, Vogel KP, Casler MD, Lamb JFS, Iten LB, Mitchell RB, Sarath G (2006) Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 30:880–891
Colley Z, Fasina OO, Bransby D, Lee YY (2006) Moisture effect on the physical characteristics of switchgrass pellets. T ASAE 49:1845–1851
Kaliyan N, Morey RV, White MD, Doering A (2009) Roll-press briquetting and pelleting of corn stover and switchgrass. T ASAE 52:543–555
Lam PS, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Lim CJ, Naimi LJ, Hoque M, Mani S, Womac AR, Ye XP, Narayan S (2008) Bulk density of wet and dry wheat straw and switchgrass particles. Appl Eng Agric 24:351–358
Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2006) Specific energy requirements for compacting corn stover. Bioresour Technol 97:1420–1426
Hess JR, Wright CT, Kenney K (2007) Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production. Biofuel Bioprod Bioref 1:181–190
Holm JK, Henriksen UB, Hustad JE, Sorensen LH (2006) Toward an understanding of controlling parameters in softwood and hardwood pellet production. Energy Fuels 20:2686–2694
Larsson SH, Thyrel M, Geladi P, Lestander TA (2008) High-quality biofuel pellet production from pre-compacted, low-density raw materials. Bioresour Technol 99:7176–7182
Mani S, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Turhollow A (2006) Economics of producing fuel pellets from biomass. Appl Eng Agric 22:421–426
Mani S, Bi X, Sokhansanj S (2005) Environmental systems assessment of biomass densification process. CSAE Paper No. 05081. Winnipeg, Manitoba
Sokhansanj S, Turhollow A (2004) Biomass densification: cubing operations and costs. Appl Eng Agric 20:495–499
Theerarattananoon K, Wu X, Staggenborg S, Propheter J, Madl R, Wand D (2010) Evaluation and characterization of sorghum biomass as feedstock for sugar production. T ASAE 53:509–525
Varga E, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2004) Optimization of steam pretreatment of corn stover to enhance enzymatic digestibility. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 114:509–523
Sluiter A, Hames B, Hyman D, Payne C, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Wolfe J (2008) Determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples. NREL/TP-510–42621. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, Colorado
Sluiter A, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D (2005) Determination of extractives in biomass: NREL/TP-510–42619. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, Colorado
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass: NREL/TP-510–42618. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, Colorado
Tabil L, Sokhansanj S (1996) Process conditions affecting the physical quality of alfalfa pellets. Appl Eng Agric 12(3):345–350
Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2004) Evaluation of compaction equations applied to four biomass species. Can Biosyst Eng 46:355–361
Han M, Moon S, Kim Y, Kim Y, Chung B, Choi G (2009) Bioethanol production from ammonia percolated wheat straw. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 14:606–611
Yu Y, Lou X, Wu H (2008) Some recent advances in hydrolysis of biomass in hot-compressed water and its comparisons with other hydrolysis methods. Energy Fuels 22:46–60
Luterbacher JS, Tester JW, Walker LP (2010) High-solids biphasic CO2–H2O pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 107:451–460
Zaldivar J, Nielsen J, Olsson L (2001) Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:17–34
Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YV (2005) Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem 40(12):3693–3700
Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K (2010) Effect of extruder parameters and moisture content of switchgrass, prairie cord grass on sugar recovery from enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:1785–1803
Zhan X, Wang D, Bean SR, Mo X, Sun XS, Boyle D (2006) Ethanol production from supercritical-fluid-extrusion cooked sorghum. Ind Crop Prod 23:304–310
Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K (2010) Effect of extruder parameters and moisture content of corn stover and big bluestem on sugar recovery from enzymatic hydrolysis. Biol Eng 2(2):91–113
Dale BE, Weaver J, Byers FM (1999) Extrusion processing for ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77–79:35–45
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Biomass Research and Development Initiative Competitive Grants Program (BRDI), USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Grant No. 68-3A75-7-609. Contribution number 11-246-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. This study was also partly supported by NSF award CMMI-0970112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Theerarattananoon, K., Xu, F., Wilson, J. et al. Effects of the pelleting conditions on chemical composition and sugar yield of corn stover, big bluestem, wheat straw, and sorghum stalk pellets. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35, 615–623 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0642-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0642-8