Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced biological nitrogen removal in MLE combined with post-denitrification process and EF clarifier

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modified ludzack ettinger reactor (MLE) combined with a post-denitrification reactor (PDMLE) using electroflotation (EF) as a secondary clarifier was investigated on its feasibility and process performance. Results indicated that higher mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations in bioreactor (5,350 ± 352 mg L−1) were maintained via the highly concentrated return sludge (16,771 ± 991 mg L−1) from the EF clarifier and the effluent suspended solids (SS) concentrations continued relatively low, representing effluent SS concentration of 1.71 ± 1.16 mg L−1, compared with GS-A2O process during the operation of four months. The denitrification was improved by combining MLE process with post-denitrification based on endogenous decay (i.e. no additional carbon source was added), resulting in the removal efficiencies of TN were about 91 and 59% for the influent C/N ratio of 10 and 5, respectively, revealing relatively high nitrogen removal as compared with EF-A2O and gravity settling (GS)-A2O processes as a control. The nitrogen balance analysis indicates that pre-denitrification and post-denitrification contributed to 78 and 22% of TN removed, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metcalf, Eddy (2003) Inc. Wastewater engineering: treatment, reuse and disposal, Fourth edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

  2. Karschunke K, Sieker (1997) Grenzen der Denitrifikation in der Biofiltrationstechnik am Beispiel der Kläranlage Nyborg. GWF Wasser Abwasser Abwasser 138(7):337–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mikawa K, Emori H, Takeshima T, Ishiyama E, Tanaka K (1996) High rate and compact two-stage post-denitrification process with single-sludge pre-denitrification. Water Sci Technol 34:467–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuba T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1996) Posphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal COD requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system. Water Res 30(7):1702–1710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Orhon D, Cokgör EU, Sözen S (1999) Experimental basis for the hydrolysis of slowly biodegradable substrate in different wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 39(1):87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Plósz BG, Jobbágy A, Grady CPL Jr (2003) Factors influencing deterioration of denitrification by oxygen entering an anoxic reactor through the surface. Water Res 37(4):853–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker D, Appleton R, Bratby J, Melcer H (2004) North American performance experience with anoxic and anaerobic selectors for activated sludge bulking control. Water Sci Technol 50(7):221–228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns SE, Yiacoumi S, Tsouris C (1997) Microbubble generation for environmental and industrial separations. Sep Purif Technol 11:221–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi YG, Kim HS, Park YH, Jeong SH, Son DH, Oh YK, Yeom IT (2005) Improvement of the thickening and dewatering characteristics of activated sludge by electroflotation (EF). Water Sci Technol 52:219–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung CM, Cho KW, Hong SW, Kim YJ, Chung TH (2009) Feasibility of electroflotation to separate solids and liquid in an activated sludge process. Environ Technol 30(14):1565–1573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho KW, Chung CM, Kim YJ, Chung TH (2010) Continuous clarification and thickening of activated sludge by electrolytic bubbles under control of scale deposition. Biores Technol 101:2945–2951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carla RC, Paulo O (2009) Effect of chloride concentration on the electrochemical treatment of a synthetic tannery wastewater. Electrochim Acta 54:2046–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khelifa A, Moulay S, Hannane F, Benslimene S, Hecini M (2004) Application of an experimental design method to study the performance of electrochlorination cells. Desalination 160:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeong JS, Kim CS, Yoon JY (2009) The effect of electrode material on the generation of oxidants and microbial inactivation in the electrochemical disinfection processes. Water Res 43:895–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bratby JR, Ambrose WA (1995) Design and control of flotation thickeners. Water Sci Technol 31:247–261

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haarhoff J, Bezuidenhout E (1999) Full-scale evaluation of activated sludge thickening by dissolved air flotation. Water SA 25:153–166

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henze M (1991) Capabilities of biological nitrogen removal processes from wastewater. Water Sci Technol 23:669–679

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuba T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1996) Posphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal COD requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system. Water Res 30(7):1702–1710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryu HD, Kim DK, Lim HE, Lee SI (2008) Nitrogen removal from low carbon-to-nitrogen wastewater in four-stage biological aerated filter system. Process Biochem 43:729–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamada K, Kuba T, Torrico V, Okazaki M, Kusuda T (2006) Comparison of nutrient removal efficiency between pre- and post-denitrification wastewater treatments. Water Sci Technol 9:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carrera J, Vicent T, Lafuente J (2004) Effect of influent COD/N ratio on biological nitrogen removal (BNR) from high-strength ammonium industrial wastewater. Process Biochem 39:2035–2041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kujawa K, Klapwijk B (1999) A method to estimate denitrification potential for predenitrification systems using NUR batch test. Water Res 33:2291–2300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abufayed AA, Schroeder ED (1986) Kinetics and stoichiometry of SBR/denitrification with primary sludge carbon source. J Water Pollut Control Fed 58:398–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vocks M, Adam C, Lesjean B, Gnirss R, Kraume M (2005) Enhanced post-denitrification without addition of an external carbon source in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 39:3360–3368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports by Eco-STAR project (Project No. I2WATERTECH 04-5) and SNU SIR Group of the BK21 research Program funded by Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. H. Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, C.M., Cho, K.W., Kim, Y.J. et al. Enhanced biological nitrogen removal in MLE combined with post-denitrification process and EF clarifier. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35, 503–511 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0623-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0623-y

Keywords

Navigation