Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Virtual parameter-estimation experiments in Bioprocess-Engineering education

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell growth kinetics and reactor concepts constitute essential knowledge for Bioprocess-Engineering students. Traditional learning of these concepts is supported by lectures, tutorials, and practicals: ICT offers opportunities for improvement. A virtual-experiment environment was developed that supports both model-related and experimenting-related learning objectives. Students have to design experiments to estimate model parameters: they choose initial conditions and ‘measure’ output variables. The results contain experimental error, which is an important constraint for experimental design. Students learn from these results and use the new knowledge to re-design their experiment. Within a couple of hours, students design and run many experiments that would take weeks in reality. Usage was evaluated in two courses with questionnaires and in the final exam. The faculties involved in the two courses are convinced that the experiment environment supports essential learning objectives well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson JR (1995) Learning and memory. An integrated approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Jong T, Van Joolingen WR (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev Educ Res 68(2):179–202

    Google Scholar 

  3. Merriënboer van JJG (1997) Training complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams V (2003) Designing simulations for learning. J Instr Sci Tech 6(1), http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/docs/Vol6_No1/contents.htm

  5. Nielsen J (2000) Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keller JM (1987) Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. J Instr Dev 10(3):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Norman D (1993) Things that make us smart—defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstein A, Lunetta VN (2003) The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci Educ 88(1):28–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher D, Harrison A, Henderson D, Hofstein A (1999) Laboratory learning environments and practical tasks in senior secondary science classes. Res Sci Educ 28:353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Champagne AB, Gunstone RF, Klopfer LE (1985) Instructional consequences of students’ knowledge about physical phenomena. In: West LHT, Pines AL (eds) Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Academic, New York, pp 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eylon B, Linn MC (1988) Learning and instruction: an examination of four research perspectives in science education. Rev Educ Res 58(3):251–301

    Google Scholar 

  12. Savery JR, Duffy TM (1995) Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educ Tech 35(5):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson JR (1993) Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trudel C, Payne SJ (1995) Reflection and goal management in exploratory learning. Int J Hum Comput Stud 42:307–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beeftink HH, Heijden Van der RTJM, Heijnen JJ (1990) Maintenance requirements: energy supply from simultaneous endogenous respiration and substrate consumption. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:203–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carroll JM, Rosson MB (1995) Managing evaluation goals for training. Comm ACM 38(7):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sagnella GA (1985) Model fitting, parameter estimation, linear and non-linear regression. Trends Biochem Sci 10:100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith LH, McCarty PL, Kitanidis PK (1998) Spreadsheet method for evaluation of biochemical reaction rate coefficients and their uncertainties by weighted nonlinear least-squares analysis of the integrated Monod equation. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2044–2050

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Munack A (1989) Optimal feeding strategy for identification of Monod-type models by fed-batch experiments. In: Fish NM, Fox RI (eds) Modelling and control of biotechnical processes. Proceedings of the 4th international congress. Comp Appl Ferm Technol, Cambridge, Pergamon, Oxford

  20. Baltes M, Schneider R, Sturm C, Reuss M (1994) Optimal experimental design for parameter estimation in unstructured growth models. Biotechnol Prog 10:480–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dette H, Melas VB, Pepelyshev A, Strigul N (2003) Efficient design of experiments in the Monod model. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 65:725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takors R, Wiechert W, Weuster-Botz D (1997) Experimental design for the identification of macrokinetic models and model discrimination. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:564–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference. A practical information and theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart WE, Shon Y, Box GEP (1998) Discrimination and goodness of fit of multiresponse mechanistic models. AIChE J 44:1404–1412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier D.T. Sessink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sessink, O.D., Beeftink, H.H., Hartog, R.J. et al. Virtual parameter-estimation experiments in Bioprocess-Engineering education. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 28, 379–386 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0042-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0042-z

Keywords

Navigation