Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 331–340 | Cite as

Computer control of pH and DO in a laboratory fermenter using a neural network technique

  • A. Mészáros
  • A. Andrášik
  • P. Mizsey
  • Z. Fonyó
  • V. Illeová
Original Paper

Abstract

In this contribution, the advantages of the artificial neural network approach to the identification and control of a laboratory-scale biochemical reactor are demonstrated. It is very important to be able to maintain the levels of two process variables, pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, over the course of fermentation in biosystems control. A PC-supported, fully automated, multi-task control system has been designed and built by the authors. Forward and inverse neural process models are used to identify and control both the pH and the DO concentration in a fermenter containing a Saccharomyces cerevisiae based-culture. The models are trained off-line, using a modified back-propagation algorithm based on conjugate gradients. The inverse neural controller is augmented by a new adaptive term that results in a system with robust performance. Experimental results have confirmed that the regulatory and tracking performances of the control system proposed are good.

Keywords

Laboratory fermenter Control system Neural networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Reuss M (1986) Computer control of bioreactors: present limits and challenges for the future. In: Preprints from the 3rd Conf on Chemical Process Control, Asimolar, CA, 12–17 January 1986, p 641Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bastin G, Dochain D (1990) On-line estimation and adaptive control of bioreactors. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mészáros A, Báleš V (1992) A contribution to optimal control of fed batch biochemical processes. Bioprocess Eng 7:363Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olsen AJC (1961) Continuous culture of microorganisms. SCI Monogram Ser 12:81Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mészáros A, Brdys’ M, Tatjewski P, Lednický P (1995) Multilayer adaptive control of continuous bioprocesses using optimising control technique. Case study: Baker’s yeast culture. Bioprocess Eng 12:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McAvoy TJ, Hsu E, Lowenthal S (1972) Dynamics of pH in a controlled stirred tank reactor. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 11:68Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gustafsson TK, Waller KV (1992) Nonlinear and adaptive control of pH. Ind Eng Chem Res 31:2681Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright RA, Kravaris C (1991) Nonlinear control of pH processes using the strong acid equivalent. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:1561–1572Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunt KJ et al (1992) Neural networks for control systems—a survey. Automatica 28:1083–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1986) Biochemical engineering fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lednický P, Mészáros A (1998) Neural network modeling in optimisation of continuous fermentation processes. Bioprocess Eng 18:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rusnák A, Mészáros A, Andrášik A (2000) Control system for a laboratory fermenter. In: Proc 4th Int Sci-Tech Conf Process Control, Kouty nad Desnou, Czech Republic, 11–14 June 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loh AP, Looi KO, Fong KF (1995) Neural network modeling and control strategies for a pH process. J Process Contr 5:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Mészáros
    • 1
  • A. Andrášik
    • 1
  • P. Mizsey
    • 2
  • Z. Fonyó
    • 2
  • V. Illeová
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical and Food TechnologySlovak University of TechnologyBratislavaSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Chemical EngineeringBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations