Skip to main content

Bioprocess control from a multivariate process trajectory

Abstract

A multivariate bioprocess control approach, capable of tracking a pre-set process trajectory correlated to the biomass or product concentration in the bioprocess is described. The trajectory was either a latent variable derived from multivariate statistical process monitoring (MSPC) based on partial least squares (PLS) modeling, or the absolute value of the process variable. In the control algorithm the substrate feed pump rate was calculated from on-line analyzer data. The only parameters needed were the substrate feed concentration and the substrate yield of the growth-limiting substrate. On-line near-infrared spectroscopy data were used to demonstrate the performance of the control algorithm on an Escherichia coli fed-batch cultivation for tryptophan production. The controller showed good ability to track a defined biomass trajectory during varying process dynamics. The robustness of the control was high, despite significant external disturbances on the cultivation and control parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3. a
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

References

  1. Wold S, Kettaneh N, Fridén H and Holmberg A (1998) Modelling and diagnostics of batch processes and analogous kinetic experiments. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 44:331–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nomikos P and MacGregor JF (1995) Multivariate {SPC} charts for monitoring batch processes. Technometrics 37:41–59

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nomikos P and MacGregor JF (1995) Multiway partial least squares in monitoring batch processes. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 30:97–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simoglou A, Martin EB and Morris AJ (2000) Multivariate statistical process control of an industrial fluidized-bed reactor. Contr Eng Prac 8:893–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glassey J, Ignova M, Montague GA and Morris AJ (2000) Issues in the development of an industrial bioprocess advisory system. Trends Biotechnol 18:136–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gregerson L and Jørgenson SB (1999) Supervision of fed-batch fermentations. Chemical Engineering Journal 75:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lennox B, Hiden H, Montague G, Kornfeld G and Goulding P (2000) Application of multivariate statistic process control to batch operations. Comp Chem Eng 24:291–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Albert S and Kinley RD (2001) Multivariate statistical monitoring of batch processes: an industrial case study of fermentation supervision. Trends Biotechnol 19:53–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lennox B, Kipling K, Glassey J, Montague G, Willis M and Hiden H (2002) Automated production support for the bioprocess industry. Biotechnol Prog 18:269–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaidyanathan S, Harvey LM and McNeil B (2001) Deconvolution of near-infrared spectral information for monitoring mycelial biomass and other key analytes in a submerged fungal bioprocess. Anal Chim Acta 428:41–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cimander C and Mandenius CF (2002) On-line monitoring of a bioprocess based on a multi-analyzer system and multivariate statistical process modelling. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:1157–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Macaloney G, Hall JW, Rollins MJ, Draper I, Anderson K,, Preston J, Thompson BG and McNeil B (1997) The utility and performance of near-infrared spectroscopy in simultaneous monitoring of multiple components in a high cell density recombinant Escherichia coli production process. Bioproc Eng 17:157–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson JE (1991) A user's guide to principal components. Wiley, New York

  14. Geladi P and Kowalski BR (1986) Partial least-squares regression: A tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185:1–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Höskuldsson A (1988) {PLS} regression methods. J Chemom 2:211–228

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaspar MH and Ray WH (1992) Chemometric methods for process monitoring and high-performance controller design. AIChE J 38:1593–1608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen G and McAvoy TJ (1996) Process control utilzing data based multivariate statistical methods. Can J Chem Eng 74:1010–1024

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen G, McAvoy TJ and Piovoso MJ (1998) A multivariate statistical controller for on-line quality improvement. J Proc Control 8:139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kano M, Miyazaki K, Hasebe S and Hashimoto I (2000) Inferential control system of distillation compositions using dynamic partial least squares regression. J Proc Contr 10:157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lakshminarayanan S, Sirish L and Nandakumar K (1997) Modeling and control of multivariable processes: dynamic {PLS} approach. AIChE J 43:2307–2322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao H, Guiver J, Neelakantan R and Biegler LT (2001) A nonlinear industrial model predictive controller using integrated {PLS} and neural net state-space model. Contr Eng Prac 9:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bachinger T and Mandenius CF (2001) Physiologically motivated monitoring of fermentation processes by means of an electronic nose. Eng Life Sci 1:33–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cimander C, Bachinger T and Mandenius CF (2003) Integration of distributed multi-analyzer monitoring and control in bioprocessing based on a real-time expert system. J Biotechnol 103, 237

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cimander C, Bachinger T and Mandenius CF (2002) Assessment of the performance of a fed-batch cultivation from the preculture quality using an electronic nose. Biotechnol Prog 18:380–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weuster-Botz D, Paschold H, Striegel B, Gieren H, Kula MR and Wandrey C (1994) Continuous computer controlled production of formate dehydrogenase (FDH) and isolation on a pilot scale. Chem Eng Technol 17:131–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eklöv T, Mårtensson P and Lundström I (1999) Selection of variables for interpreting multivariate gas sensor data. Anal Chim Acta 381:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu B, Jahic M, Blomsten G and Enfors SO (1999) Modelling of overflow metabolism in batch and fed-batch cultures of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Prog 15:81–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA, contact no. 341–2001–03766). We also thank Mr. David Lindgren for valuable suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl-Fredrik Mandenius.

Appendix

Appendix

Simulation model for growth on phosphate, Table1.

Table 1. Model parameters

The bioreactor volume is determined by

$$ {{{dV} \over {dt}} = F_{{phos}} } $$
(19)

with the dilution rate defined as

$$ {D = {{F_{{phos}} } \over V}} $$
(20)

Biomass develops as

$$ {{{dc_{x} } \over {dt}} = (\mu - D)c_{x} } $$
(21)

Substrate usage is described by

$$ \frac{{dc_{{phos}} }} {{dt}} = D\cdot {\left( {c_{{phos,0}} - c_{{phos}} } \right)} - \mu \cdot Y^{{phase}}_{{phos/x}} \cdot c_{x} $$
(22)

The yield coefficient \( {Y^{{phase}}_{{phos/x}} } \) during the batch and fed-batch phase changes. Therefore, one yield coefficient during each of the phases was applied.

The specific growth rate follows Monod kinetics for the substrate concentration c phos .

$$ {\mu = \mu _{{\max }} {{c_{{phos}} } \over {c_{{phos}} + k^{M}_{{phos}} }}} $$
(23)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cimander, C., Mandenius, CF. Bioprocess control from a multivariate process trajectory. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 26, 401–411 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-003-0327-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-003-0327-z

Keywords

  • Biomass
  • Partial Little Square
  • Tracking Performance
  • Yield Coefficient
  • Partial Little Square Component