Construction dynamics of a lava channel

  • Andrew J. L. HarrisEmail author
  • Massimiliano Favalli
  • Francesco Mazzarini
  • Christopher W. Hamilton
Research Article


We use a kinematic GPS and laser range finder survey of a 200 m-long section of the Muliwai a Pele lava channel (Mauna Ulu, Kilauea) to examine the construction processes and flow dynamics responsible for the channel–levee structure. The levees comprise three packages. The basal package comprises an 80–150 m wide ′a′a flow in which a ∼2 m deep and ∼11 m wide channel became centred. This is capped by a second package of thin (<45 cm thick) sheets of pahoehoe extending no more than 50 m from the channel. The upper-most package comprises localised ′a′a overflows. The channel itself contains two blockages located 130 m apart and composed of levee chunks veneered with overflow lava. The channel was emplaced over 50 h, spanning 30 May–2 June, 1974, with the flow front arriving at our section (4.4 km from the vent) 8 h after the eruption began. The basal ′a′a flow thickness yields effusion rates of 35 m3 s−1 for the opening phase, with the initial flow advancing across the mapped section at ∼10 m/min. Short-lived overflows of fluid pahoehoe then built the levee cap, increasing the apparent channel depth to 4.8 m. There were at least six pulses at 90–420 m3 s−1, causing overflow of limited extent lasting no more than 5 min. Brim-full flow conditions were thus extremely short-lived. During a dominant period of below-bank flow, flow depth was ∼2 m with an effusion rate of ∼35 m3 s−1, consistent with the mean output rate (obtained from the total flow bulk volume) of 23–54 m3 s−1. During pulses, levee chunks were plucked and floated down channel to form blockages. In a final low effusion rate phase, lava ponded behind the lower blockage to form a syn-channel pond that fed ′a′a overflow. After the end of the eruption the roofed-over pond continued to drain through the lower blockage, causing the roof to founder. Drainage emplaced inflated flows on the channel floor below the lower blockage for a further ∼10 h. The complex processes involved in levee–channel construction of this short-lived case show that care must be taken when using channel dimensions to infer flow dynamics. In our case, the full channel depth is not exposed. Instead the channel floor morphology reflects late stage pond filling and drainage rather than true channel-contained flow. Components of the compound levee relate to different flow regimes operating at different times during the eruption and associated with different effusion rates, flow dynamics and time scales. For example, although high effusion rate, brim-full flow was maintained for a small fraction of the channel lifetime, it emplaced a pile of pahoehoe overflow units that account for 60% of the total levee height. We show how time-varying volume flux is an important parameter in controlling channel construction dynamics. Because the complex history of lava delivery to a channel system is recorded by the final channel morphology, time-varying flow dynamics can be determined from the channel morphology. Developing methods for quantifying detailed flux histories for effusive events from the evidence in outcrop is therefore highly valuable. We here achieve this by using high-resolution spatial data for a channel system at Kilauea. This study not only indicates those physical and dynamic characteristics that are typical for basaltic lava flows on Hawaiian volcanoes, but also a methodology that can be widely applied to effusive basaltic eruptions.


Lava channel Levees Effusion rates Flow dynamics 



We are extremely grateful to Ben Brooks (University of Hawaii) for loan of GPS equipment, and to the hard work of the (Pistoiese) rover: Dario delle Donne. Field work by AJLH was supported by NASA Grant NNG04GO64G, with follow up work funded by an INGV contract; MF & FM were supported by INGV funds. This manuscript benefited from thorough, insightful and encouraging reviews of Sonia Calvari and Adam Soule.


  1. Ashtech (2002) Ashtech solutions user’s guide. Thales Navigation, Santa Clara, p 184Google Scholar
  2. Bailey JE, Harris AJL, Dehn J, Calvari S, Rowland SK (2006) The changing morphology of an open lava channel on Mt. Etna. Bull Volcanol 68:497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calvari S, Pinkerton H (1999) Lava tube morphology on Etna and evidence for lava flow emplacement mechanisms. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 90:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cashman KV, Mangan MT, Newman S (1994) Surface degassing and modifications to vesicle size distributions in active basalt flows. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 61:45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dragoni M (1989) A dynamical model of lava flows cooling by radiation. Bull Volcanol 51:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaze LS, Baloga SM (2006) Rheologic inferences from the levees of lava flows on Mars. J Geophys Res 111:E09006.1–E09006.10 doi: 10.1029/2005JE002585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaze LS, Baloga SM (2007) Topographic variability on Mars: implications for lava flow modelling. J Geophys Res 112:E08006 doi: 10.1029/2006JE002879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guest JE, Stofan ER (2005) The significance of slab-crusted lava flows for understanding controls on flow emplacement at Mount Etna, Sicily. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 142:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herd RA, Pinkerton H (1997) Bubble coalesence in basaltic lava: its impact on the evolution of bubble populations. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 75:137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heslop S, Wilson L, Pinkerton H, Head J (1989) Dynamics of a confined lava flow on Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Bull Volcanol 51:415–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hon K, Kauahikaua J, Denlinger R, Mackay K (1994) Emplacement and inflation of pahoehoe sheet flows: observations and measurements of active lava flows on Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Geol Soc Am Bull 106:351–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houghton BF, Wilson CJN (1989) A vesicularity index for pyroclastic deposits. Bull Volcanol 51:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchinson MF (1989) A new procedure for griddding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. J Hydrol 106:211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffreys H (1925) The flow of water in an inclined channel of rectangular section. Phil Mag 49:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kilburn CRJ, Guest JE (1993) Aa lavas of Mount Etna, Sicily. In: Kilburn CRJ, Luongo G (eds) Active lavas: monitoring and modeling. UCL, London, pp 73–106Google Scholar
  16. Linneman SR, Borgia A (1993) The blocky andesitic lava flows of Arenal volcano, Costa Rica. In: Kilburn CRJ, Luongo G (eds) Active lavas: monitoring and modelling. UCL, London, pp 25–72Google Scholar
  17. Lipman PW, Banks NG (1987) Aa flow dynamics, Mauna Loa. UGSG Prof Pap 1350:1527–1567Google Scholar
  18. Moore HJ (1987) Preliminary estimates of the rheological properties of 1984 Mauna Loa lava. UGSG Prof Pap 1350:1569–1588Google Scholar
  19. Murase T, McBirney AR (1973) Properties of some common igneous rocks and their melts at high temperatures. Geol Soc America Bulletin 84:3563–3592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naranjo JA, Sparks RSJ, Stasiuk MV, Moreno H, Ablay GJ (1992) Morphological, structural and textural variations in the 1988–1990 andesite lava of Lonquimay Volcano, Chile. Geol Mag 129(6):657–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nichols RL (1939) Surficial banding and shark’s-tooth projections in the cracks of basaltic lava. Am J Sci 237(8):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polacci M, Papale P (1997) The evolution of lava flows from ephemeral vents at Mount Etna: insights from vesicle distribution and morphological studies. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 76:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rowland SK, Walker GPL (1987) Toothpaste lava: characteristics and origin of a lava structural type transitional between pahoehoe and aa. Bull Volcanol 49:631–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaw HR, Wright TL, Peck DL, Okamura R (1968) The viscosity of basaltic magma: an analysis of field measurements in Makaopuhi lava lake, Hawaii. Am J Sci 266:225–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soule SA, Cashman KV, Kauahikaua JP (2004) Examining flow emplacement through the surface morphology of three rapidly emplaced, solidified lava flows, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. Bull Volcanol 66:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sparks RSJ, Pinkerton H, Hulme G (1976) Classification and formation of lava levees on Mount Etna, Sicily. Geology 4:269–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Swanson DA, Duffield WA, Jackson DB, Peterson DW (1979) Chronological narrative of the 1969–71 Mauna Ulu eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1056:1–55Google Scholar
  28. Tilling RI, Christiansen RL, Duffield WA, Endo ET, Holcomb RT, Koyanagi RY, Peterson DW, Unger JD (1987) The 1972–1974 Mauna Ulu eruption, Kilauea volcano: an example of quasi-steady-state magma transfer. UGSG Prof Pap 1350:405–469Google Scholar
  29. Walker GPL (1989) Spongy pahoehoe in Hawaii: a study of vesicle-distribution patterns in basalt and their significance. Bull Volcanol 51:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White FM (2006) Viscous fluid flow. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 629Google Scholar
  31. Wolfe EW, Neal CA, Banks NG, Duggan TJ (1988) Geologic observations and chronology of eruptive events. USGS Prof Pap 1463:1–97Google Scholar
  32. Woodcock D, Harris AJL (2006) The dynamics of a channel-fed lava flow on Pico Partido volcano, Lanzarote: evidence for a hydraulic jump? Bull Volcanol 69:207–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. L. Harris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Massimiliano Favalli
    • 2
  • Francesco Mazzarini
    • 2
  • Christopher W. Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.HIGP/SOESTUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaSezione di PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations