Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal shift in diet affects female reproductive anatomy but not mating behavior

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Females experience considerable environmental variability when breeding seasons are long. Adverse nutritional conditions can result in a reduction in mating and reproduction. However, a return to good nutrition may help animals resume high reproductive investment. I tested the silver spoon hypothesis in which females raised under poor conditions are reproductively limited compared to those raised under good conditions regardless of their adult environment. I used a specialist herbivore, Narnia femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae), that lives on seasonally changing cacti. I provided juveniles and adults with a cactus pad with fruit (good diet), without fruit (restricted diet), or an improved adult diet (no fruit as juveniles, fruit at adulthood) to simulate a seasonal change in their diets near the end of the breeding season. I found that both ovary size and egg presence were reduced for females fed the restricted diet compared to those fed the good diet. Females fed the improved diet grew large ovaries like those fed the good diet, but few produced any eggs. Interestingly, female mating behavior did not change but females were less attractive to males when fed restricted diets. My results support the silver spoon hypothesis for compensatory growth and suggest that tradeoffs may occur between early survival and future reproduction when females experience a poor early life diet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and code used for analyses are included as electronic files in the electronic supplementary material.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Christine Miller, Daniela Wilner, and Ginny Greenway for their support with this experiment. I would also like to thank my amazing undergraduate research team that helped with this experiment including Skyler Brandfon, Amberlika Guruvadoo, Brandon Latchman, Meredith Lilley, Gagan Midathala, Joshua Vildor, and Maxwell Woolridge. They dedicated many hours and provided detailed data collection for which I am so grateful. I would also like to thank Camp Blanding Joint Training Center for allowing us to collect cactus and bugs on their 72 000-acre training site (Florida Army and National Guard). Finally, I would like to thank the EEB journal club at University of Florida, C.W. Miller, P.J. Moore, R.L. Rodriguez, F. Alberto, T.M. Palmer, and C. St. Mary for providing comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. IOS-1553100) and the UF Agricultural Experiment Station, the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the US Department of Agriculture (HATCH under Grant No. FLA-ENY-005691).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LAC conceived, designed, and executed this study and wrote the manuscript. 

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren A. Cirino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Communicated by Kyle J Haynes.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cirino, L.A. Seasonal shift in diet affects female reproductive anatomy but not mating behavior. Oecologia 202, 397–411 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05398-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05398-7

Keywords

Navigation