Abstract
Bryophytes play important role in forest ecosystem functioning and their distribution and diversity are driven by numerous environmental factors. The aim of the present study was to bring new insights in deeper understanding of terrestrial bryophytes diversity in temperate forests, as well as to determine the environmental factors which have predominant influence on ground-floor bryophytes. The survey was conducted in Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) across seven forest sites where ground-bryophytes were sampled. Soil moisture, temperature, and pH were measured as soil characteristics, while herbaceous cover, litter cover, stream distance, number of trees and shrubs were used as characteristics of stand structure. Species richness, Shannon diversity index, and evenness index were used as diversity measures. Generalised linear model and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were used to test the influence of environmental variables on bryophyte diversity. Litter cover was the most important explanatory variable, followed by soil moisture, stream distance and tree number, respectively. Overall, the stand structure was found to have a greater impact on ground-floor bryophyte diversity compared to soil characteristics. Identification of the most significant ecological factors affecting the diversity and distribution of bryophytes in forest ecosystems is of great importance in forest ecology with the aim of defining adequate management methods to preserve the biodiversity of forests, with particular emphasis on endangered and rare bryophyte species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alpert P (1985) Distribution quantified by microtopography in an assemblage of saxicolous mosses. Vegetatio 64:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044789
Alpert P (1991) Microtopography as habitat structure for mosses on rocks. In: Bell SS, Mccoy DE, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habit structure. The physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 120–139
Atherton I, Bosanquiet S, Lawley M (2010) Mosses and liverworts of Britain and Ireland-a field guide. British Bryological Society, Peterborough
Benscoter BW, Vitt DH (2007) Evaluating feathermoss growth: a challenge to traditional methods and implications for the boreal carbon budget. J Ecol 95:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01180.x
Bergamini A, Pauli D, Peintinger M, Schmid B (2001) Relationships between productivity, number of shoots and number of species in bryophytes and vascular plants. J Ecol 89:920–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00613.x
Birks HJB, Heegaard E, Birks HH, Jonsgard B (1998) Quantifying bryophyte-environment relationships. In: Bates JW, Ashton NW, Duckett JG (eds) Bryology for the twenty-first century. Maney Publishing and the British Bryological Society, London, Leeds, pp 305–319
Branković S, Medarević M, Pantić D, Petrović N, Šljukić B, Obradović S (2009) Šumski fond Republike Srbije-stanje i problemi. Glas Šumar Fak 100:7–30. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF0900007B
Burgess-Conforti J, Moore P, Owens P, Miller D, Ashworth A, Hays P, Evans-White M, Anderson K (2019) Are soils beneath coniferous tree stands more acidic than soils beneath deciduous tree stands? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04883-y
Caners RT, Mackdonald SE, Belland RJ (2013) Bryophyte assemblage structure after partial harvesting in boreal mixedwood forest depends on residual canopy abundance and composition. For Ecol Manag 289:486–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.044
Chen Y, Niu S, Li P, Jia H, Wang H, Ye Y, Yuan Z (2017) Stand structure and substrate diversity as two major drivers for bryophyte distribution in a temperate montane ecosystem. Front Plant Sci 8:874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00874
Cox JE, Larson DW (1993) Environmental relations of the bryophytic and vascular components of a talus slope plant community. J Veg Sci 4:553–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236083
DeLuca TB, Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC, Sellstedt A (2002) Quantifying nitrogen-fixation in feather moss carpets of boreal forests. Nature 419:917–920. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01051
DeLucia EH, Turnbull MH, Walcroft AS, Griffin K, Tissue DT, Glennym D, McSeveny TM, Whitehead D (2003) The contribution of bryophytes to the carbon exchange for a temperate rainforest. Glob Chang Biol 9:1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00650.x
Düll R (2010) Zeigerwerte der Moose. In: Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (eds) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 6th edn. Ulmer UTB, Stuttgart, pp 67–97
Equihua M, Usher M (1993) Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. J Ecol 81(2):359–365. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261506
Erfanzadeh R (2013) Impact of phanerogam and soil characteristics on bryophyte assemblages with respect to restoration practices (case study: IJzermonding, Belgium). Ecopersia 1(1):41–51
Fenton N, Lecomte N, Légaré S, Bergeron Y (2005) Paludification in black spruce (Picea mariana) forests of eastern Canada: potential factors and management implications. For Ecol Manag 213:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.017
Gosselin M, Fourcin S, Dumas Y, Gosselin F, Korbulewsky N, Toïgo M, Vallet P (2017) Influence of forest tree species composition on bryophytic diversity in mixed and pure pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) stands. For Ecol Manag 406:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.067
Grytnes JA, Heegaard E, Ihlan PG (2006) Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens along an altitudinal gradient in western Norway. Acta Oecol 29:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2005.10.007
Gustafsson L, Fiskesjö A, Hallingbäck T, Ingelög T, Pettersson B (1992) Semi-natural deciduous broadleaved woods in southern Sweden—habitat factors of importance to some bryophyte species. Biol Cons 59(2–3):175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)90579-C
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol Electron 4(1):9
Hodgetts NG, Söderstörm L, Blockeel TL, Caspari S, Ignatov MS, Konstantinova NA et al (2020) An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus. J Bryol 42(1):1–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329
Hofstede RGM, Wolf JHD, Benzing DH (1993) Epiphyte biomass and nutrient status of a Colombian upper montane rain forest. Selbyana 14:37–45
Horvat V, Heras P, García-Mijangos I, Biurrun I (2017) Intensive forest management affects bryophyte diversity in the western Pyrenean silver fir-beech forests. Biol Conserv 215:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.09.007
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50(3):346–363
Hylander K, Dynesius M (2006) Causes of the large variation in bryophyte species richness and composition among boreal streamside forest. J Veg Sci 17:333–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02453.x
Ilić M, Igić R, Ćuk M, Vukov D (2018) Field sampling methods for investigating forest-floor bryophytes: microcoenose vs. random sampling. Arch Biol Sci 70(3):589–598. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS180422020I
Jongmans AG, van Breemen N, Gradstein SR, van Oort F (2001) How liverworts build hanging gardens from volcanic ash in Costa Rica. CATENA 44:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00151-X
Kaufmann S, Hauck M, Leuschner C (2017) Comparing the plant diversity of paired beech primeval and production forests: management reduces cryptogam, but not vascular plant species richness. For Ecol Manag 400:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.043
Kolari P, Pumpanen J, Kulmala L, Ilvesniemi H, Nikinmaa E, Grönholm T, Hari P (2006) Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 221:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.021
Lee D, La Roi GH (1979) Bryophyte and understory vascular plant beta diversity in relation to moisture and elevation gradients. Vegetatio 40:29–38
Lozano-Parra J, Pulido M, Lozano-Fondón C, Schnabel S (2018) How do soil moisture and vegetation covers influence soil temperature in drylands of Mediterranean regions? Water 10:1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121747
Márialigeti S, Németh B, Tinya F, Ódor P (2009) The effects of stand structure on ground-floor bryophyte assemblages in temperate mixed forests. Biodivers Conserv 18(8):2223–2241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9586-6
Martinez ML, Maun MA (1999) Responses of dune mosses to experimental burial by sand under natural and greenhouse conditions. Plant Ecol 145:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850304137
McMullan-Fisher SJM, Kirkpatrick JB, May TW, Pharo EJ (2010) Surrogates for macrofungi and mosses in reservation planning. Conserv Biol 24:730–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01378.x
Mendiburu F, Yaseen M (2020) agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.4. 0, https://myaseen208.github.io/agricolae/https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae
Merrifield K, Ingham R (1998) Nematodes and other aquatic invertebrates in Eurhynchium oreganum from Mary’s Peak, Oregon Coast Range. Bryologist 101(4):505–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/3244525
Meusel H, Jäger E, Weinert E (1965) Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. Text und Kartenband, vol 1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena
Meusel H, Jäger E, Rauschert S, Weinert E (1978) Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. Text und Kartenband, vol 2. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena
Mežaka A, Brumelis G, Piterans A (2012) Tree and stand scale factors affecting richness and composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in deciduous woodland key habitats. Biodivers Conserv 21:3221–3241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0361-8
Milić Č (1973) Fruška gora-geomorfološka proučavanja. Matica srpska, Odeljenje za prirodne nauke, Novi Sad
Mills SE, Macdonald SE (2004) Predictors of moss and liverwort species diversity of microsites in conifer-dominated boreal forest. J Veg Sci 15:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02254.x
Morgan JW (2006) Bryophyte mats inhibit germination of non-native species in burnt temperate native grassland remnants. Biol Invasions 8:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-004-2881-y
Müller J, Boch S, Blaser S, Fischer M, Prati D (2015) Effects of forest management on bryophyte communities on deadwood. Nova Hedwigia 100:423–438. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0242
Müller J, Boch S, Prati D, Socher SA, Pommer U, Hessenmöller D et al (2019) Effects of forest management on bryophyte species richness in Central European forests. For Ecol Manag 432:850–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.019
Nelson C, Halpern C (2005) Short-term effects of timber harvest and forest edges on ground-layer mosses and liverworts. Canad J Bot 83(6):610–620. https://doi.org/10.1139/b05-036
Nihlgård B (1971) Pedological influence of spruce planted on former beech forest soils in Scania, South Sweden. Oicos 22(3):302–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/3543854
O’Neill KP (2000) Role of bryophyte dominated ecosystems in the global carbon budget. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 344–368
Ódor P, Király I, Tinya F, Bortignon F, Nascimbene J (2013) Patterns and drivers of species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in managed temperate forests. For Ecol Manag 306:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.001
Peck JE (2006) Towards sustainable commercial moss harvest in the Pacific Northwest of North America. Biol Conserv 128:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.001
Petrović J, Bugarski D, Ćurčić S, Bogdanović Ž (1973) Vode Fruške gore. Matica Srpska, Odeljenje za prirodne nauke, Novi Sad
Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13:131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0
Rambo TR, Muir PS (1998) Forest floor bryophytes of Pseudotsuga menziesii-Tsuga heterophylla stands in Oregon: influences of substrate and overstory. Bryologist 101(1):116–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/3244083
Rieley J, Richards P, Bebbington A (1979) The ecological role of bryophytes in North Wales woodland. J Ecol 67:497–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259109
Rydin H (2009) Population and community ecology of bryophytes. In: Goffinet B, Shaw JA (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 445–486
Rydin H, Jeglum JK (2006) The biology of peatlands. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Šmilauer P, Lepš J (2014) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Spitale D (2017) Forest and substrate type drive bryophyte distribution in the Alps. J Bryol 39(2):128–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2016.1274090
Steel JB, Wilson B, Anderson BJ, Lodge RHE, Tangney RS (2004) Are bryophyte communities different from higher-plant communities? Abundance relations. Oikos 104:479–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12840.x
Stehn SE, Webster CR, Glime JM, Jenkins MA (2010) Ground layer Bryophyte communities of post-adelgid Picea-Abies forests. Southeast Nat 9(3):435–452. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.009.0303
Sveinbjörnsson B, Oechel WC (1992) Controls on growth and productivity of bryophytes: environmental limitations under current and anticipated conditions. In: Bates JW, Farmer AM (eds) Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 77–102
Tinya F, Márialigeti S, Király I, Németh B, Ódor P (2009) The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in Őrség, Western Hungary. Plant Ecol 204:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9566-z
Vanderpoorten A, Goffinet B (2009) Introduction to bryophytes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vanderpoorten A, Papp B, Gradstein R (2010) Sampling of bryophytes. In: Eymann J, Degreef J, Häuser C, Monje JC, Samyn Y, Vandespiegel D (eds) Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for all taxa biodiversity inventories, vol 8. ABC Taxa, Belgium, pp 331–345
Vellak K, Ingerpuu N (2005) Management effects on bryophytes in Estonian forests. Biodivers Conserv 14:3255–3263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0445-1
Vellak K, Paal J, Liira J (2002) Diversity and distribution pattern of bryophytes and vascular plants in a boreal spruce forest. Silva Fenn 37(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.508
Virtanen R, Johnston AE, Crawley MJ, Edwards GR (2000) Bryophyte biomass and species richness on the Park Grass Experiment, Rothamsted, UK. Plant Ecol 151:129–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026533418357
Vitt DH, Wieder RK (2009) The structure and function of bryophyte dominated peatlands. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ (eds) Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 357–391
Vitt DH, Li Y, Belland R (1995) Patterns of bryophyte diversity in peatlands of continental western Canada. Bryologist 98:218–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/3243306
Vukov D, Galić Z, Rućando M, Ilić M, Ćuk M, Igić D, Igić R, Orlović S (2016) Effects of natural broadleaved regeneration vs conifer restoration on the herb layer and microclimate. Arch Biol Sci 68(3):483–493. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS150727037V
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York
Zamfir M, Dai X, van der Maarel E (1999) Bryophytes, lichens and phanerogams in an alvar grassland: relationships at different scales and contributions to plant community pattern. Ecography 22:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00453.x
Funding
This research is funded by Ministry of Education, Science and Technological development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200125 and Grant No. 451-03-47/2023-01/200125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MI and DV originally formulated the idea and experiment design. MI, DV and MĆ performed the field research and data collection, MI, DV and RI performed data analysis, MI led the manuscript writing, RI, MĆ, MV, SR, SO, DV contribute to manuscript writing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethic approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Melinda D. Smith.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ilić, M., Igić, R., Ćuk, M. et al. Environmental drivers of ground-floor bryophytes diversity in temperate forests. Oecologia 202, 275–285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05391-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05391-0