Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prey species increase activity in refugia free of terrestrial predators

  • Behavioral ecology –original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The decline of terrestrial predator populations across the globe is altering top-down pressures that drive predator–prey interactions. However, a knowledge gap remains in understanding how removing terrestrial predators affects prey behavior. Using a bifactorial playback experiment, we exposed fox squirrels to predator (red-tailed hawks, coyotes, dogs) and non-predator control (Carolina wren) calls inside terrestrial predator exclosures, accessible to avian predators, and in control areas subject to ambient predation risk. Fox squirrels increased their use of terrestrial predator exclosures, a pattern that corresponded with 3 years of camera trapping. Our findings suggest fox squirrels recognized that exclosures had predictably lower predation risk. However, exclosures had no effect on their immediate behavioral response towards any call, and fox squirrels responded most severely to hawk predator calls. This study shows that anthropogenically driven predator loss creates predictably safer areas (refugia) that prey respond to proactively with increased use. However, the persistence of a lethal avian predator is sufficient to retain a reactive antipredator response towards an immediate predation threat. Some prey may benefit from shifting predator–prey interactions by gaining refugia without sacrificing a sufficient response towards potential predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code used for analysis of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of Florida and The Jones Center at Ichauway for financial and logistic support. We thank Gail Morris, Jessica Davis, Haley Epperly, and Cat Frock for their field assistance. We thank Kevin Gerena for assistance with scoring videos. We are grateful for the insightful comments provided by Katie Sieving and 3 anonymous reviewers, whose efforts significantly improved this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from The University of Florida funding to RAM, The Jones Center at Ichauway to LMC, and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery and Research Tools and Instruments Grants to LYZ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ADP, LMC, and RAM conceived the experiments, and all the authors contributed to experimental design. ADP carried out data collection, statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. LMC, MC, LYZ, and RAM critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex D. Potash.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All field methods were approved by the University of Florida’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC# 201709906).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Kathryn E Sieving.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 121 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Potash, A.D., Conner, L.M., Clinchy, M. et al. Prey species increase activity in refugia free of terrestrial predators. Oecologia 201, 661–671 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05350-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05350-9

Keywords

Navigation