Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wandering spiders recover more slowly than web-building spiders after fire

  • Conservation ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire is a natural feature of many ecosystems, with some vegetation types highly adapted to fire. However, very little is known about the effect of fire on spiders, especially as fires have become more frequent owing to human activity. We determine whether different spider functional guilds (web builders vs. wanderers) respond differently to fires in the sclerophyllous fynbos. We determine also the effect of rockiness as refuge for these guilds and whether it influences their post-fire recovery. There were three site categories of time-since-last fire: 3 months, 1 year, and 7 years. We found that fire caused a decline in spider richness and abundance, with the 3-month category supporting the lowest. In sites that were burned within 1 year, abundance of wanderers was as high as in sites that had 7 years to recover, whereas species richness and abundance of web builders in sites that were burned 1 year ago were as low as in recently burned sites. However, assemblages of wanderers differed among categories, while no differences were observed for web builders, highlighting that wanderers took longer time to recover than web builders. Species richness and abundance of both guilds were not affected by different levels of rockiness. However, rockiness is important in shaping assemblages of wanderers. The results emphasize that the assemblages of greatest conservation concern with increased fire frequencies are wanderers and are candidate surrogates for monitoring post-fire recovery. These results highlight the need to allow fynbos vegetation to recover fully between fire intervals and draws attention to the dangers of frequent unplanned fires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Rustenburg, Boschendal, and Montagne farms for access, and D. Ngadze, P. Tshililo, Z. Tyeku, F. Becker, B. Dlamini, M. Mukundamago, S. Mensah, R. Agrela, L. Sikhutshwa, M. Pheme, S. Adu-Acheampong, and A. Katumanyane for field assistance. Funding was from the National Research Foundation (freestanding postdoctoral fellowship—SFP150722129143), and the work was carried out under Cape Nature collection permit no. AAA007-00196-0056.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IY, JSP, RG and MJS conceived and designed the project, IY investigated and curated data, IY and JSP analysed data, IY, JSP and MJS acquired funding, IY administered the project, IY and JSP acquired resources, IY validated and visualized the project, IY wrote the original draft of the manuscript, JSP, RG and MJS edited and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inam Yekwayo.

Additional information

Communicated by Sven Bacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yekwayo, I., Pryke, J.S., Gaigher, R. et al. Wandering spiders recover more slowly than web-building spiders after fire. Oecologia 191, 231–240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04471-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04471-4

Keywords

Navigation