Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does adaptation to historical climate shape plant responses to future rainfall patterns? A rainfall manipulation experiment with common ragweed

  • Global change ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change is affecting both the volume and distribution of precipitation, which in turn is expected to affect the growth and reproduction of plant populations. The near ubiquity of local adaptation suggests that adaptive differentiation may have important consequences for how populations are affected by and respond to changing precipitation. Here, we manipulated rainfall in a common garden to examine how differentiation among populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) affects responses to water availability expected under climate change. We collected seeds from 26 populations along gradients of historical rainfall and used event-based rainout shelters and watering additions to simulate drier summer conditions and more extreme rainfall events, respectively. Ambrosia artemisiifolia had higher fitness on average under reduced rainfall, suggesting it may spread and become more abundant in areas projected to become hotter and drier during the summer months. We also found strong evidence for phenotypic and fitness clines across both latitude and longitude, and that phenological responses and fitness effects of altered rainfall depended on seed source or historical climate. The effect of rainfall treatment on female fitness was highest in western and mid longitudes, but there was little effect on eastern populations. Across latitude, the effect of rainfall treatment on male fitness was highest in southern populations. These phenology and fitness clines suggest that adaptive differentiation across the species’ range has the potential to shape future responses of A. artemisiifolia populations to climate change, particularly altered patterns of rainfall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.W. Benning, J.Y. Kim, A. Peschel for assistance with planting, rainout shelter deployment, and data collection in the field., M. Merello for assistance with seed collections, C.G. Willis for assistance with data analysis, R.A. Montgomery and R.G. Shaw for advice on experimental design and data analysis, R.A. Montgomery and J.S. Powers for the use of data loggers and soil moisture probes, the Living Labs Program at the University of Minnesota for providing the field site, and members of the Moeller and Tiffin labs for useful feedback and discussions. A.J.G was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarships Doctoral Program and the University of Minnesota Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship. The seed collections and field experiment were supported by the Carolyn M. Crosby Award awarded to A.J.G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJG, PT, and DAM conceived and designed the experiment. AJG conducted all seed collections and conducted the field experiment. AJG conducted all data analyses, with advice and assistance from DAM and PT. AJG, PT, and DAM wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda J. Gorton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Casey P. terHorst.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1272 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorton, A.J., Tiffin, P. & Moeller, D.A. Does adaptation to historical climate shape plant responses to future rainfall patterns? A rainfall manipulation experiment with common ragweed. Oecologia 190, 941–953 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04463-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04463-4

Keywords

Navigation