Migration to freshwater increases growth rates in a facultatively catadromous tropical fish

Abstract

Diadromy is a form of migration where aquatic organisms undergo regular movements between fresh and marine waters for the purposes of feeding and reproduction. Despite having arisen in independent lineages of fish, gastropod molluscs and crustaceans, the evolutionary drivers of diadromous migration remain contentious. We test a key aspect of the ‘productivity hypothesis’, which proposes that diadromy arises in response to primary productivity differentials between marine and freshwater habitats. Otolith chemistry and biochronology data are analysed in a facultatively catadromous tropical fish (barramundi, Lates calcarifer) to determine the effect of freshwater residence on growth rates. Individuals that accessed freshwater grew ~ 25% faster on average than estuarine residents in the year following migration, suggesting that catadromy provides a potential fitness advantage over non-catadromous (marine/estuarine) life histories, as predicted by the productivity hypothesis. Although diadromous barramundi exhibited faster growth than non-diadromous fish, we suggest that the relative reproductive success of diadromous and non-diadromous contingents is likely to be strongly influenced by local environmental variability such as temporal differences in river discharge, and that this may facilitate the persistence of diverse life history strategies within populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Arai T, Kotake A, Lokman PM, Miller MJ, Tsukamoto K (2004) Evidence of different habitat use by New Zealand freshwater eels Anguilla australis and A. dieffenbachii, as revealed by otolith microchemistry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 266:213–225. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps266213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball JP, Nordengren C, Wallin K (2001) Partial migration by large ungulates: characteristics of seasonal moose Alces alces ranges in northern Sweden. Wildlife Biol 7:39–47. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2001.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barneche DR, Robertson DR, White CR, Marshall DJ (2018) Fish reproductive-energy output increases disproportionately with body size. Science 360:642–645. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao6868

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisazza A, Marconato A (1988) Female mate choice, male-male competition and parental care in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Anim Behav 36:1352–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80204-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bloom DD, Lovejoy NR (2014) The evolutionary origins of diadromy inferred from a time-calibrated phylogeny for Clupeiformes (herring and allies). Proc R Soc B 281:2013–2081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bœuf G, Payan P (2001) How should salinity influence fish growth? Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 130:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00268-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bond MH, Miller JA, Quinn TP (2015) Beyond dichotomous life histories in partially migrating populations: cessation of anadromy in a long-lived fish. Ecology 96:1899–1910. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1551.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cairns DK, Secor DA, Morrison WE, Hallet JA (2009) Salinity-linked growth in anguillid eels and the paradox of temperate-zone catadromy. J Fish Biol 74:2094–2114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02290.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campana SE (1990) How reliable are growth back-calculations based on otoliths? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:2219–2227. https://doi.org/10.1139/f90-246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campana SE, Thorrold SR (2001) Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman BB, Brönmark C, Nilsson J-Å, Hansson L-A (2011) The ecology and evolution of partial migration. Oikos 120:1764–1775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20131.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapman BB, Skov C, Hulthén K, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson LA, Brönmark C (2012) Partial migration in fishes: definitions, methodologies and taxonomic distribution. J Fish Biol 81:479–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03349.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crook DA, Lowe WH, Allendorf FW, Erős T, Finn DS, Gillanders BM, Hadwen WL, Harrod C, Hermoso V, Jennings S, Kilada RW, Nagelkerken I, Hansen MM, Page TJ, Riginos C, Fry B, Hughes JM (2015) Human effects on ecological connectivity in aquatic ecosystems: integrating scientific approaches to support management and mitigation. Sci Total Environ 534:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.034

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crook DA, Buckle DJ, Allsop Q, Baldwin W, Saunders TM, Kyne PM, Woodhead JD, Maas R, Roberts B, Douglas MM (2017) Use of otolith chemistry and acoustic telemetry to elucidate migratory contingents in barramundi Lates calcarifer. Mar Freshwater Res 68:1554–1566. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Leenheer P, Mohapatra A, Ohms HA, Lytle DA, Cushing J (2017) The puzzle of partial migration: adaptive dynamics and evolutionary game theory perspectives. J Theor Biol 412:172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Douglas MM, Bunn SE, Davies PM (2005) River and wetland food webs in Australia’s wet–dry tropics: general principles and implications for management. Mar Freshw Res 56:329–342. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Durham B, Wilde G (2009) Effects of streamflow and intermittency on the reproductive success of two broadcast-spawning cyprinid fishes. Copeia 2009:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-07-166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elsdon TS, Wells BK, Campana SE, Gillanders BM, Jones CM, Limburg KE, Secor DH, Thorrold SR, Walther BD (2008) Otolith chemistry to describe movements and life-history parameters of fishes: hypotheses, assumptions, limitations and inferences. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 46:297–330

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feutry P, Castelin M, Ovenden JR, Dettaï A, Robinet T, Cruaud C, Keith P (2013) Evolution of diadromy in fish: insights from a tropical genus (Kuhlia species). Am Nat 181:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/668593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleming IA (1996) Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 6:379–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gillanders BM, Izzo C, Doubleday ZA, Ye Q (2015) Partial migration: growth varies between resident and migratory fish. Biol Let. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grey DL (1987) An overview of Lates calcarifer in Australia and Asia. In: Copland IW, Grey DL (eds) Management of wild and cultured sea bass/barramundi (Lates calcarifer): proceedings of an international workshop held at Darwin, NT, Australia, 24–30 Sept 1986. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, pp 15–21

  24. Gross MR (1987) Evolution of diadromy in fishes. In: American fisheries society symposium, pp 14–25

  25. Gross MR, Coleman RM, McDowall RM (1988) Aquatic productivity and the evolution of diadromous fish migration. Science 239:1291–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4845.1291

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hansson L-A, Hylander S (2009) Size-structured risk assessments govern Daphnia migration. Proc Roy Soc B 276:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hendry AP, Bohlin T, Jonsson B, Berg OK (2004) To sea or not to sea. Evolution illuminated. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 92–125

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hogan JD, Blum MJ, Gilliam JF, Bickford N, McIntyre PB (2014) Consequences of alternative dispersal strategies in a putatively amphidromous fish. Ecology 95:2397–2408. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0576.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hughes JM, Schmidt DJ, Macdonald JI, Huey JA, Crook DA (2014) Low inter-basin connectivity in a facultatively diadromous fish: evidence from genetics and otolith chemistry. Mol Ecol 23:1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12373

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jardine TD, Pusey BJ, Hamilton SK, Pettit NE, Davies PM, Douglas MM, Sinnamon V, Halliday IA, Bunn SE (2012) Fish mediate high food web connectivity in the lower reaches of a tropical floodplain river. Oecologia 168:829–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2148-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Junk W, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: Dodge DP (ed) Proceedings of the international large river symposium, vol 106. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, pp 110–127

  32. Kendall NW, McMillan JR, Sloat MR, Buehrens TW, Quinn TP, Pess GR, Kuzishchin KV, McClure MM, Zabel RW (2014) Anadromy and residency in steelhead and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): a review of the processes and patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:319–342. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0192

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kraus RT, Secor DH (2004) Dynamics of white perch Morone americana population contingents in the Patuxent River estuary, Maryland, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 279:247–259. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps279247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lundberg P (1988) The evolution of partial migration in birds. Trends Ecol Evolut 3:172–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90035-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McDowall RM (1988) Diadromy in fishes: migrations between freshwater and marine environments. Croom Helm, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  36. McDowall RM (1997) The evolution of diadromy in fishes (revisited) and its place in phylogenetic analysis. Rev Fish Biol Fish 7:443–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McDowall RM (1998) Driven by diadromy: its role in the historical and ecological biogeography of the New Zealand freshwater fish fauna. Ital J Zool 65:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250009809386799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McDowall R (1999) Different kinds of diadromy: different kinds of conservation problems. ICES J Mar Sci 56:410–413. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Monro K, Marshall DJ (2014) Faster is not always better: selection on growth rate fluctuates across life history and environments. Am Nat 183:798–809. https://doi.org/10.1086/676006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Morrongiello JR, Thresher RE (2015) A statistical framework to explore ontogenetic growth variation among individuals and populations: a marine fish example. Ecol Monogr 85:93–115. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2355.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Morrongiello JR, Thresher RE, Smith DC (2012) Aquatic biochronologies and climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:849–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Myers GS (1949) Usage of anadromous, catadromous and allied terms for migratory fishes. Copeia 2:89–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1438482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Perez KO, Munch SB (2010) Extreme selection on size in the early lives of fish. Evolution 64(8):2450–2457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00994.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio Inc, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schindler DE, Hilborn R, Chasco B, Boatright CP, Quinn TP, Rogers LA, Webster MS (2010) Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465:609-612. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v465/n7298/suppinfo/nature09060_S1.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2018

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Snyder RJ (1991) Migration and life histories of the threespine stickleback: evidence for adaptive variation in growth rate between populations. Environ Biol Fishes 31:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sponaugle S, Grorud-Colvert K, Pinkard D (2006) Temperature-mediated variation in early life history traits and recruitment success of the coral reef fish Thalassoma bifasciatum in the Florida Keys. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 308:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps308001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stuart I, McKillup S (2002) The use of sectioned otoliths to age barramundi (Lates calcarifer) (Bloch, 1790) [Centropomidae]. Hydrobiologia 479:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021021720945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wipfli MS, Hudson JP, Caouette JP, Chaloner DT (2003) Marine subsidies in freshwater ecosystems: salmon carcasses increase the growth rates of stream-resident salmonids. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:371–381. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2003)132%3c0371:MSIFES%3e2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Woodhead J, Swearer S, Hergt J, Maas R (2005) In situ Sr-isotope analysis of carbonates by LA-MC-ICP-MS: interference corrections, high spatial resolution and an example from otolith studies. J Anal Atom Spectrom 20:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/B412730G

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Northern Territory Fisheries and anonymous recreational and commercial fishermen for providing the otoliths used in this study. Jonathan Taylor assisted with otolith preparation. The research is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program, Charles Darwin University and an Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BR and DC designed the research. BR performed biochronological analyses, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. TS provided otoliths used in this study. JW and BR conducted microchemical analyses. JM provided statistical expertise. DC, JM, DM, AK and TS discussed and interpreted the results and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brien H. Roberts.

Additional information

Our study provides the first evidence that catadromy confers a growth advantage. We provide new insights into the evolutionary and ecological factors that may shape the expression of diadromy in fish.

Communicated by Brian Shuter.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, B.H., Morrongiello, J.R., King, A.J. et al. Migration to freshwater increases growth rates in a facultatively catadromous tropical fish. Oecologia 191, 253–260 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04460-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Diadromy
  • Partial migration
  • Life history
  • Biochronology
  • Otolith chemistry