Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drift-kelp suppresses foraging movement of overgrazing sea urchins

Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sea urchins have the capacity to destructively overgraze kelp beds and cause a wholesale shift to an alternative and stable ‘urchin barren’ reef state. However, destructive grazing appears labile and contingent on behavioural shift. Changes in supply of allochthonous ‘drift-kelp’ food are hypothesised as a trigger of change in urchin grazing behaviour, yet field tests are lacking. Here we conduct a suite of in situ behavioural surveys and manipulative experiments within kelp beds and on urchin barrens to examine foraging movements and evidence for a behavioural switch to an ‘overgrazing mode’ by the Australian urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (Echinometridae). Tracking urchins using time-lapse photography revealed urchin foraging to conform to a random walk model within kelp beds and on barrens. However, many individuals tended towards local movement within proximal crevices and movement was reduced in kelp beds compared to barrens. Directional movement of urchins toward newly available kelp was experimentally inducible, consistent with locally observed ‘mobile-feeding-fronts’ that develop at barrens-kelp interfaces. Habitat-specific feeding modes were also evidenced by herbivory assays which revealed urchin grazing rates to be high on both drift-kelp and standing kelp on barren grounds, while drift-kelp but not standing kelp was consumed at high rates within kelp beds. Time-lapse tracking of urchin foraging before/after addition of drift-kelp revealed a reduction in foraging across the reef surface after drift-kelp capture. Collectively, results indicate that the availability of drift-kelp is a pivotal trigger in determining urchin feeding modes which thus mediates the shift between alternative stable states for rocky reef ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew NL (1993) Spatial heterogeneity, sea urchin grazing, and habitat structure on reefs in temperate Australia. Ecology 74:292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin D, Bowen W, McMillan J (2004) Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modeling individual behaviour in a large marine predator. Oikos 105:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner D, Blanckenhorn WU, Koerner C (2005) Grasshoppers cope with low host plant quality by compensatory feeding and food selection: N limitation challenged. Oikos 111:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein B, Williams B, Mann K (1981) The role of behavioral responses to predators in modifying urchins’ (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) destructive grazing and seasonal foraging patterns. Mar Biol 63:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conradt L, Roper T (2006) Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. Ecology 87:125–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constable AJ (1989) An investigation of resource allocation in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (Valenciennes 1846). University of Melbourne, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras S, Castilla J (1987) Feeding behavior and morphological adaptations in two sympatric sea urchin species in central Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 38:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH (1992) Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:405–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day EG, Branch GM (2002) Influences of the sea urchin Parechinus angulosus (Leske) on the feeding behaviour and activity rhythms of juveniles of the South African abalone Haliotis midae Linn. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 276:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean TA, Schroeter SC, Dixon JD (1984) Effects of grazing by two species of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and Lytechinus anamesus) on recruitment and survival of two species of kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera and Pterygophora californica). Mar Biol 78:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont CP, Himmelman JH, Robinson SMC (2007) Random movement pattern of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 340:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ (1997) Australian marine life. REED Books, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehmi JS, Karn JF, Ries RE, Hendrickson JR, Hanson JD (2002) Cattle grazing behavior with season-long free-choice access to four forage types. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flukes EB, Johnson CR, Ling SD (2012) Forming sea urchin barrens from the inside out: an alternative pattern of overgrazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 464:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Bellwood D (2013) Niche partitioning of feeding microhabitats produces a unique function for herbivorous rabbitfishes (Perciformes, Siganidae) on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 32:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrold C, Reed DC (1985) Food availability, sea-urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66:1160–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill NA, Blount C, Poore AGB, Worthington D, Steinberg PD (2003) Grazing effects of the sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii in two contrasting rocky reef habitats: effects of urchin density and its implications for the fishery. Mar Freshw Res 54:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CR, Swearer SE, Ling SD, Reeves S, Kriegisch N, Treml EA, Ford JR, Fobert E, Black KP, Weston K, Sherman CDH (2015) The reef ecosystem evaluation framework: managing for resilience in temperate environments. Seagrass and reefs. Final report for Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning. Victoria, Australia

  • Kareiva P, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56:234–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konar B (2000) Seasonal inhibitory effects of marine plants on sea urchins: structuring communities the algal way. Oecologia 125:208–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konar B, Estes JA (2003) The stability of boundary zones between kelp beds and deforested areas. Ecology 84:174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegisch N, Reeves S, Johnson CR, Ling SD (2016) Phase-shift dynamics of sea urchin overgrazing on nutrient enhanced reefs. PLoS One 11:E016833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegisch N, Reeves SE, Johnson CR, Ling SD (2019) Top-down sea urchin overgrazing overwhelms bottom-up stimulation of kelp beds despite sediment enhancement. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 514:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauzon-Guay J-S, Scheibling RE (2007) Behaviour of sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis grazing fronts: food-mediated aggregation and density-dependent facilitation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 329:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauzon-Guay JS, Scheibling RE, Barbeau MA (2006) Movement patterns in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachaensis. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 86:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling SD, Johnson CR (2012) Marine reserves reduce risk of climate-driven phase shift by reinstating size- and habitat-specific trophic interactions. Ecol Appl 22:1232–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ling SD, Ibbott S, Sanderson JC (2010) Recovery of canopy-forming macroalgae following removal of the enigmatic grazing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 395:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling SD, Scheibling RE, Rassweiler A, Johnson CR, Shears N, Connell SD, Salomon AK, Norderhaug KM, Pérez-Matus A, Hernández JC, Clemente S, Blamey LK, Hereu B, Ballesteros E, Sala E, Garrabou J, Cebrian E, Zabala M, Fujita D, Johnson LE (2015) Global regime shift dynamics of catastrophic sea urchin overgrazing. Philos Trans R Soc B 370:20130269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling S, Kriegisch N, Woolley B, Reeves S (2019) Density-dependent feedbacks, hysteresis and demography of overgrazing sea urchins. Ecology 100:e02577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:405–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg B, Golani D (1995) Diet adaptations of Lessepsian migrant rabbitfishes, Siganus luridus and S. rivulatus, to the algal resources of the Mediterranean Coast of Israel. Mar Ecol 16:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BF (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattison JE, Trent JD, Shanks AL, Akin TB, Pearse JS (1977) Movement and feeding activity of red sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) adjacent to a kelp forest. Mar Biol 39:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson B, Vance R (1979) Diel foraging patterns of the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus as a predator avoidance strategy. Mar Biol 51:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden JC, Lobel PS (1978) The role of herbivorous fishes and urchins in coral reef communities. Environ Biol Fishes 3:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden JC, Brown RA, Salesky N (1973) Grazing by the echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi: formation of halos around West Indian patch reefs. Science 182:715–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson HG, Johnson CR (2006) Predation of the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma by rock lobsters (Jasus edwardsii) in no-take marine reserves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 336:120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson HG, Johnson CR (2008) Growth and age structure of sea urchins (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) in complex barrens and native macroalgal beds in eastern Tasmania. ICES J Mar Sci 65:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preen A (1995) Impacts of dugong foraging on seagrass habitats: observational and experimental evidence for cultivation grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves SE, Kriegisch N, Johnson CR, Ling SD (2018) Reduced resistance to sediment-trapping turfs with decline of native kelp and establishment of an exotic kelp. Oecologia 188:1239–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez SR, Farina JM (2001) Effect of drift kelp on the spatial distribution pattern of the sea urchin Tetrapygus niger: a geostatistical approach. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 81:179–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokos C, Andreadis K, Papageorgiou N (2015) Diet adaptability by a generalist herbivore: the case of brown hare in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Zool Stud 54:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant JP, MacLeod N (2014) Snout shape in extant ruminants. PLoS One 9:e112035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in plants and animals. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2005) Persistence of the exotic kelp Undaria pinnatifida does not depend on sea urchin grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift MA, Kendrick GA (2004) Variation in abundances of herbivorous invertebrates in temperate subtidal rocky reef habitats. Mar Freshw Res 55:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift MA, Kendrick GA (2005) Contrasting influence of sea urchins on attached and drift macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 299:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift MA, Wernberg T (2008) Detached kelps from distant sources are a food subsidy for sea urchins. Oecologia 157:327–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift MA, Lavery PS, Waddington KI (2009) Intensity of herbivory on kelp by fish and sea urchins differs between inshore and offshore reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 376:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JT, Dworjanyn SA, Rogers CN, Steinberg PD, Williamson JE, Poore AGB (2005) Density-dependent sea urchin grazing: differential removal of species, changes in community composition and alternative community states. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Pearson Education India, Noida

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Victorian State Government Department of Environment Land Water and Planning grant to CRJ, plus Australian Postgraduate Awards and Holsworth Wildlife Endowments to NK/SER, plus Australian Research Council funds to SDL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SDL and NK designed the research. SDL, NK and SER performed all field sampling; NK, SDL and EBF analysed data and wrote the manuscript; CRJ and all other authors edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Ling.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel C. Reed.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 413 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kriegisch, N., Reeves, S.E., Flukes, E.B. et al. Drift-kelp suppresses foraging movement of overgrazing sea urchins. Oecologia 190, 665–677 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04445-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04445-6

Keywords

Navigation