, Volume 189, Issue 4, pp 1083–1094 | Cite as

Scale-dependent patterns of intraspecific trait variations in two globally invasive species

  • C. EvangelistaEmail author
  • J. D. Olden
  • A. Lecerf
  • J. Cucherousset
Ecosystem ecology – original research


Animal species often show substantial intraspecific trait variability (ITV), yet evidence for its flexibility across multiple ecological scales remains poorly explored. Gaining this knowledge is essential to better understand the different processes maintaining ITV in nature. Due to their broad geographic ranges, widespread invasive species are expected to display strong phenotypic variations across their distribution. Here, we quantified the scale-dependent patterns of morphological variability among invasive populations of two global freshwater invaders—red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii and pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus—both established in American and European lakes. We quantified patterns in body morphology across different ecological (Individual and Population) and spatial scales (Region). We then analyzed the scale-dependency of morphological variations among lake populations that span a diversity of abiotic and biotic conditions. Next, we used stable isotope analyses to test the existence of ecomorphological patterns linking morphology and trophic niche of individuals. We found that trait variations mainly accounted for at the regional and individual levels. We showed that populations of both species strongly differed between United States and Europe whereas habitat characteristics had a relatively minor influence on morphological variations. Stable isotope analyses also revealed that ecomorphological pattern for the trophic position of L. gibbosus was region-dependent, whereas no ecomorphological patterns were observed for P. clarkii. Overall, our study strongly supports the notion that the patterns of phenotypic variability among invasive populations are likely to modulate the ecological impacts of invasive species on recipient ecosystems.


Ecomorphology Lepomis gibbosus Procambarus clarkii Geometric morphometrics Stable isotopes 



We are very grateful to our numerous colleagues for their help during sampling and thank Florian Vincent for creating the map of the studied areas. We thank two anonymous reviewers and the editors for their valuable comments.

Author contribution statement

CE, JC and JDO designed and conceived the study and led the fieldwork. CE analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the preparation of the manuscript and gave final approval for publication.


This work was supported by a CNRS-INEE PICS (Ind_Eco_Evo_Inva) and GDRI (EFF), the ONEMA (Projet ISOLAC and ERADINVA) and a PRES-Toulouse Grant (Inva_Eco_Evo_Lac). CE and JC are part of EDB, part of the French Laboratory of Excellence project “TULIP” (ANR-10-LABX.41; ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02). JDO was support by the University of Washington H. Mason Keeler Endowed Professorship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Authorizations to perform this study were provided by the “Arrêtés Préfectoraux—18/09/2014 and 30/10/2014”.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4374_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1288 kb)


  1. Ahlroth P, Alatalo RV, Holopainen A et al (2003) Founder population size and number of source populations enhance colonization success in waterstriders. Oecologia 137:617–620. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alós J, Palmer M, Linde-Medina M, Arlinghaus R (2014) Consistent size-independent harvest selection on fish body shape in two recreationally exploited marine species. Ecol Evol 4:2154–2164. Google Scholar
  3. Alp M, Cucherousset J, Buoro M, Lecerf A (2016) Phenological response of a key ecosystem function to biological invasion. Ecol Lett 19:519–527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araújo MS, Costa-Pereira R (2013) Latitudinal gradients in intraspecific ecological diversity. Biol Lett 9:20130778. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araújo MS, Gonzaga MO (2007) Individual specialization in the hunting wasp Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) albonigrum (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1855–1863. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Araújo MS, Bolnick DI, Layman CA (2011) The ecological causes of individual specialisation. Ecol Lett 14:948–958. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassar RD, Marshall MC, Lopez-Sepulcre A et al (2010) Local adaptation in Trinidadian guppies alters ecosystem processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3616–3621. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300. Google Scholar
  9. Bestion E, Clobert J, Cote J (2015) Dispersal response to climate change: scaling down to intraspecific variation. Ecol Lett 18:1226–1233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blount ZD, Borland CZ, Lenski RE (2008) Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:7899–7906. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS et al (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26:183–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, p 55455. Google Scholar
  13. Chalmandrier L, Münkemüller T, Colace M-P et al (2017) Spatial scale and intraspecific trait variability mediate assembly rules in alpine grasslands. J Ecol 105:277–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Changeux T (2003) Evolution de la répartition des écrevisses en France métropolitaine selon les enquêtes nationales menées par le conseil supérieur de la pêche de 1977 à 2001. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 370–371:15–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colborne SF, Garner SR, Longstaffe FJ, Neff BD (2015) Assortative mating but no evidence of genetic divergence in a species characterized by a trophic polymorphism. J Evol Biol 29:633–644. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Copp GH, Fox MG (2007) Growth and life history traits of introduced pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in Europe, and the relevance to its potential invasiveness. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–306  CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa-Pereira R, Rudolf VHW, Souza FL, Araújo MS (2018) Drivers of individual niche variation in coexisting species. J Anim Ecol. Google Scholar
  18. Des Roches S, Post DM, Turley NE et al (2018) The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nat Ecol Evol 2:57–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Domenici P, Turesson H, Brodersen J, Bronmark C (2008) Predator-induced morphology enhances escape locomotion in crucian carp. Proc R Soc B 275:195–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubuc-Messier G, Réale D, Perret P, Charmantier A (2017) Environmental heterogeneity and population differences in blue tits personality traits. Behav Ecol. Google Scholar
  21. Etchison L, Jacquemin SJ, Allen M, Pyron M (2012) Morphological variation of rusty crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Cambaridae) with gender and local scale spatial gradients. Int J Biol 4:163–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evangelista C, Boiche A, Lecerf A, Cucherousset J (2014) Ecological opportunities and intraspecific competition alter trophic niche specialization in an opportunistic stream predator. J Anim Ecol 83:1025–1034. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evangelista C, Britton RJ, Cucherousset J (2015) Impacts of invasive fish removal through angling on population characteristics and juvenile growth rate. Ecol Evol 5:2193–2202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faulks L, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P, Östman Ö (2015) Genetic and morphological divergence along the littoral–pelagic axis in two common and sympatric fishes: perch, Perca fluviatilis (Percidae) and roach, Rutilus rutilus (Cyprinidae). Biol J Linn Soc. Google Scholar
  25. Foster SA, Scott RJ, Cresko WA (1998) Nested biological variation and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:207–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, SAGE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  27. García-Berthou E, Moreno-Amich R (2000) Food of introduced pumpkinseed sunfish: ontogenetic diet shift and seasonal variation. J Fish Biol 57:29–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gherardi F (2006) Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 39:175–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harmon LJ, Matthews B, Des Roches S et al (2009) Evolutionary diversification in stickleback affects ecosystem functioning. Nature 458:1167–1170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobbs HH, Jass JP, Huner JV (1989) A review of global crayfish introductions with particular emphasis on two North American species. Crustaceana 56:299–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchinson GE (1957) A treatise on limnology, vol 1. Geography, Physics and Chemistry, Wiley, New York, p 1015Google Scholar
  32. Jackson MC, Evangelista C, Zhao T et al (2017) Between-lake variation in the trophic ecology of an invasive crayfish. Freshw Biol 62:1501–1510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour 11:353–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knop E, Reusser N (2012) Jack-of-all-trades: phenotypic plasticity facilitates the invasion of an alien slug species. Proc R Soc B 279:4668–4676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laforsch C, Tollrian R (2004) Inducible defenses in multipredator environments: cyclomorphosis in Daphnia cucullata. Ecology 85:2302–2311. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langerhans RB, DeWitt TJ (2004) Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Am Nat 164:335–349. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langsrud Ø (2003) ANOVA for unbalanced data: use Type II instead of type III sums of squares. Stat Comput 13:163–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larson ER, Olden JD (2011) The state of crayfish in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 36:60–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Larson ER, Olden JD (2013) Crayfish occupancy and abundance in lakes of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Freshw Sci 32:94–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Layman CA, Araujo MS, Boucek R et al (2012) Applying stable isotopes to examine food-web structure: an overview of analytical tools. Biol Rev 87:545–562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li T, Wu J, Chen H et al (2018) Intraspecific functional trait variability across different spatial scales: a case study of two dominant trees in Korean pine broadleaved forest. Plant Ecol 219:875–886. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matthews B, Marchinko KB, Bolnick DI, Mazumder A (2010) Specialization of trophic position and habitat use by sticklebacks in an adaptive radiation. Ecology 91:1025–1034. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Messier J, McGill BJ, Lechowicz MJ (2010) How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecol Lett 13:838–848. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moran EV, Hartig F, Bell DM (2016) Intraspecific trait variation across scales: implications for understanding global change responses. Global Chang Biol 22:137–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mueller KW (2001) First record of the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae), from Washington State, USA. Crustaceana 74:003–1007Google Scholar
  47. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nilsson PA, Brönmark C, Petterson LB (1995) Benefits of a predator-induced morphology in crucian carp. Oecologia 104:291–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parsons KJ, Robinson BW (2007) Foraging performance of diet-induced morphotypes in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) favours resource polymorphism. J Evol Biol 20:673–684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pfennig DW, Wund MA, Snell-Rood EC et al (2010) Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:459–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2018) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. Accessed 07 April 2018
  53. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Post DM, Layman CA, Arrington DA et al (2007) Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152:179–189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quevedo M, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2009) Intrapopulation niche partitioning in a generalist predator limits food web connectivity. Ecology 90:2263–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  57. Richardson JL, Urban MC, Bolnick DI, Skelly DK (2014) Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 29:165–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Riopel C, Robinson BW, Parsons KJ (2008) Analyzing nested variation in the body form of Lepomid sunfishes. Environ Biol Fishes 82:409–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson BW, Parsons KJ (2002) Changing times, spaces, and faces: tests and implications of adaptive morphological plasticity in the fishes of northern postglacial lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1819–1833. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rohlf FJ (2015) The tps series of software. Hystrix 26:9–12. Google Scholar
  61. Rosenblum EB, Harmon LJ (2011) “Same same but different”: replicated ecological speciation at white sand. Evolution 65:946–960. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith TB, Skùlason S (1996) Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fishes, amphibian and birds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 27:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sol D, Lefebvre L (2000) Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90:599–605. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Souty-Grosset C, Anastácio PM, Aquiloni L et al (2016) The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe: impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Limnologica 58:78–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2002) Effects of habitat and food resources on morphology and ontogenetic growth trajectories in perch. Oecologia 131:61–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2004) Morphology in perch affects habitat specific feeding efficiency. Funct Ecol 18:503–510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tinker MT, Bentall G, Estes JA (2008) Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:560–565. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Twardochleb LA, Olden JD (2016) Non-native Chinese mystery snail (Bellamya chinensis) supports consumers in urban lake food webs. Ecosphere 7:e01293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Twardochleb LA, Olden JD, Larson ER (2013) A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of nonnative crayfish. Freshw Sci 32:1367–1382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Kleef H, van der Velde G, Leuven RSEW, Esselink H (2008) Pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) invasions facilitated by introductions and nature management strongly reduce macroinvertebrate abundance in isolated water bodies. Biol Invasions 10:1481–1490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y (2002) Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83:2152–2161.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vander Zanden MJ, Cabana G, Rasmussen JB (1997) Comparing trophic position of freshwater fish calculated using stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15N) and literature dietary data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1142–1158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wainwright PC (1996) Ecological explanation through functional morphology: the feeding biology of sunfishes. Ecology 77:1336–1343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (2005) Warmwater fishes of Washington. Report #FM93-9Google Scholar
  76. Weese DJ, Ferguson MM, Robinson BW (2012) Contemporary and historical evolutionary processes interact to shape patterns of within-lake phenotypic divergences in polyphenic pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus. Ecol Evol 2:574–592. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Závorka L, Lang I, Raffard A et al (2018) Importance of harvest-driven trait changes for invasive species management. Front Ecol Environ 16:317–318. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets DH, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists. Elsevier Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao T, Grenouillet G, Pool T et al (2016) Environmental determinants of fish community structure in gravel pit lakes. Ecol Freshw Fish 25:412–421. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UMR 5174 EDB (Laboratoire Evolution and Diversité Biologique)CNRS, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, ENFAToulouseFrance
  2. 2.EcoLabUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, INP, UPSToulouseFrance
  3. 3.School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiosciencesCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations