Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard

Abstract

The environment experienced by a mother can have profound effects on the fitness of her offspring (i.e., maternal effects). Maternal effects can be adaptive when the developmental environments experienced by offspring promote phenotypes that provide fitness benefits either via matching offspring phenotype to the post-developmental environment (also known as anticipatory maternal effects) or through direct effects on offspring growth and survival. We tested these hypotheses in a viviparous lizard using a factorial experimental design in which mothers received either high or low amounts of food during gestation, and resultant offspring were raised on either high or low amounts of food post-birth. We found no effect of food availability during gestation on reproductive traits of mothers or offspring traits at birth. However, offspring from mothers who received low food during gestation exhibited a greater increase in condition in the post-birth period, suggesting some form of priming of offspring by mothers to cope with an anticipated poor environment after birth. Offspring that received low food during gestation were also more likely to die, suggesting a trade-off for this accelerated growth. There were also significant effects of post-birth food availability on offspring snout-vent length and body condition growth, with offspring with high food availability post birth doing better. However, the effects of the pre- and post-natal resource evnironment on offspring growth were independent on one another, therefore, providing no support for the presence of anticipatory maternal effects in the traditional sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data accessibility

Data available from Dryad Digital Repository (Botterill-James et al. 2019).

References

  1. Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature 401:60–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/43425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Badyaev AV, Uller T (2009) Parental effects in ecology and evolution: mechanisms, processes and implications. Philos T Roy Soc B 364:1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Botterill-James T, Halliwell B, Cooper-Scott E, Uller T, Wapstra E, While GM (2016) Habitat structure influences parent-offspring association in a social lizard. Front Ecol Evol 4:96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2016.00096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Botterill-James T, Halliwell B, McKeown S, Sillince J, Uller T, Wapstra E, While GM (2017) Family aggression in social lizard. Sci Rep 7:3502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Botterill-James T, Munch KL, Halliwell B, Chapple DG, Gardner MG, Wapstra E, While GM (2019) Data from: Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3sk8ht4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgess SC, Marshall DJ (2014) Adaptive parental effects: the importance of estimating environmental predictability and offspring fitness appropriately. Oikos 123:769–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cadby CD, Jones SM, Wapstra E (2011) Potentially adaptive effects of maternal nutrition during gestation on offspring phenotype of a viviparous reptile. J Exp Biol 214:4234–4239. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.057349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caley MJ, Schwarzkopf L (2004) Complex growth rate evolution in a latitudinally widespread species. Evolution 58:862–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00417.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cartledge VA, Jones S (2007) Does adrenal responsiveness vary with sex and reproductive status in Egernia whitii, a viviparous skink? Gen Comp Endoc 150:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2006.07.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chapple DG (2003) Ecology, life-history, and behavior in the Australian scincid genus Egernia, with comments on the evolution of complex sociality in lizards. Herpetol Monogr 17:145–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapple DG, Keogh JS (2006) Group structure and stability in social aggregations of White’s skink, Egernia whitii. Ethology 112:247–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01153.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doody SJ, Guarino E, Georges A, Corey B, Murray G, Ewert M (2006) Nest site choice compensates for climate effects on sex ratios in a lizard with environmental sex determination. Evol Ecol 20:307–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-0003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. English S, Fawcett TW, Higginson AD, Trimmer PC, Uller T (2016) Adaptive use of information during growth can explain long-term effects of early life experiences. The Am Nat 187:620–632. https://doi.org/10.1086/685644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Engqvist L, Reinhold K (2016) Adaptive trans-generational phenotypic plasticity and the lack of an experimental control in reciprocal match/mismatch experiments. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1482–1488. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL (2008) Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. New Engl J Med 359:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0708473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Groothuis TGG, Taborsky B (2015) Introducing biological realism into the study of developmental plasticity in behaviour. Front Zool 12(Suppl):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-12-S1-S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gvodzik L (2002) To heat or to save time? Thermoregulation in the lizard Zootoca vivipara (Squamata: Lacertidae) in different thermal environments along an altitudinal gradient. Can J Zool 80:479–492. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hales CN, Barker DJ (2001) The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Brit Med Bull 60:5–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Halliwell B, Uller T, Chapple DG, Gardner MG, Wapstra E, While GM (2017) Habitat saturation promotes delayed dispersal in a social reptile. Behav Ecol 28:515–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hopwood PE, Moore AJ, Royle NJ (2014) Effects of resource variation during early life and adult social environment on contest outcomes in burying beetles: a context-dependent silver spoon strategy? P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 281:20133102. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Itonaga K, Jones SM, Wapstra E (2012) Effects of maternal basking and food quantity during gestation provide evidence for the selective advantage of matrotrophy in a viviparous lizard. PLoS ONE 7:e41835. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly D, Coutts A (2000) Early nutrition and the development of immune function in the neonate. P Nutr Soc 59:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665100000197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kofman O (2002) The role of prenatal stress in the etiology of developmental behavioural disorders. Neurosci Biobehav R 26(4):457–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kotrschal A, Heckel G, Bonfils D, Taborsky B (2012) Life-stage specific environments in a cichlid fish: implications for inducible maternal effects. Evol Ecol 26:123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9495-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kotrschal A, Szidat S, Taborsky B (2014) Developmental plasticity of growth and digestive efficiency in dependence of early-life food availability. Funct Ecol 28:878–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall DJ, Uller T (2007) When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116:1957–1963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16203.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02124-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mousseau TA, Dingle H (1991) Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu Rev Entomol 36:511–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13:403–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01472-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Muller W, Groothuis TGG, Kasprzik A, Dijkstra X, Alatalo RV, Siitari H (2005) Prenatal androgen exposure modulates cellular and humoral immune function of blackheaded gull chicks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1971–1977. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Peig J, Green AJ (2009) New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883–1891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peig J, Green AJ (2010) The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol 24:1323–1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01751.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Räsänen K, Kruuk L (2007) Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21:408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01246.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rossiter M (1996) Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:451–476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rutkowska J, Cichoń M (2002) Maternal investment during egg laying and offspring sex: an experimental study of zebra finches. Anim Behav 64:817–822. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Segers FHID, Berishvili G, Taborsky B (2012) Egg size-dependent expression of growth hormone receptor accompanies compensatory growth in fish. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 279:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.1973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shine R, Downes SJ (1999) Can pregnant lizards adjust their offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions? Oecologia 119:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Taborsky B (2006) Mothers determine offspring size in response to own juvenile growth conditions. Biol Lett 22:225–228. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Taborsky B (2017) Developmental plasticity: Preparing for life in a complex world. Adv Stud Behav 49:49–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2016.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Telemeco RS, Elphick MJ, Shine R (2009) Nesting lizards (Bassiana duperreyi) compensate partly, but not completely, for climate change. Ecology 90:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1452.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Uller T (2008) Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Uller T, While GM, Cadby CD, Harts A, OʼConnor K, Pen I, Wapstra E (2011) Altitudinal divergence in maternal thermal effects in a viviparous lizard is concordant with patterns of behavioural thermoregulation and natural selection on offspring phenotype. Evolution 65:2313–2315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01303.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Uller T, Nakagawa S, English S (2013) Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals. J Evol Biol 26:2161–2170. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wade MJ (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Mousseau T, Fox C (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Li SR, Zeng ZG, Liang L, Du WG (2017) Maternal food availability affects offspring performance and survival in a viviparous lizard. Funct Ecol 31:1950–1956. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wapstra E, Swain R, Jones SM, O’Reilly J (1999) Geographic and annual variation in reproductive cycles in the Tasmanian spotted snow skink, Niveoscincus ocellatus (Squamata: Scincidae). Aust J Zool 47:539–550. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO99038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Warner DA, Buckelew AM, Pearson PR, Dhawan A (2015) The effect of prey availability on offspring survival depends on maternal food resources. Biol J Linn Soc 115:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. While GM, Wapstra E (2008) Are there benefits to being born asynchronously? Behav Ecol 19:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. While GM, Uller T, Wapstra E (2009a) Within-population variation in social strategies characterize the social and mating system of an Australian lizard, Egernia whitii. Austral Ecol 34:938–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02002.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. While GM, Uller T, McEvoy J, Wapstra E (2009b) Long-lasting effects of among-but not within-litter timing of birth in a viviparous lizard. Evol Ecol Res 11:1259–1270

    Google Scholar 

  52. While GM, Uller T, Bordogna G, Wapstra E (2014) Promiscuity resolves constraints on social mate choice imposed by population viscosity. Mol Ecol 23:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wilson S, Swan G (2017) A complete guide to Australian reptiles, 5th edn. New Holland, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wolf JB, Wade MJ (2009) What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos T Roy Soc B 364:1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Tobias Uller for discussion of ideas and detailed comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The work was funded by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund (to TBJ) and the Australian Research Council (grant number DP150102900 to GMW, MGG and DGC). GMW was supported by the Australian Research Council (Grant number DE150100336). All work was carried out with approval from the Animal Ethics Committee at the University of Tasmania (Ethics Approval Number A0015058).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TBJ, BH, EW, and GMW conceived the ideas and designed methodology with input from all other authors. TBJ, BH, and KM collected the data. TBJ analysed the data. TBJ and GMW led the writing of the manuscript with all authors contributing critically to the drafts and giving final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey M. While.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-François Le Galliard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Botterill-James, T., Munch, K.L., Halliwell, B. et al. Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard. Oecologia 189, 611–620 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04349-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Egernia
  • Liopholis
  • Lizard
  • Developmental plasticity
  • Maternal effect