Antler growth as a cost of reproduction in female reindeer

Abstract

The costs of reproduction are important in shaping individual life histories, and hence population dynamics, but the mechanistic pathways of such costs are often unknown. Female reindeer have evolved antlers possibly due to interference competition on winter-feeding grounds. Here, we investigate if variation in antler size explains part of the cost of reproduction in late winter mass of female reindeer. We captured 440 individual Svalbard reindeer a total of 1426 times over 16 years and measured antler size and body mass in late winter, while presence of a ‘calf-at-heel’ was observed in summer. We found that reproductive females grew smaller antlers and weighed 4.3 kg less than non-reproductive females. Path analyses revealed that 14% of this cost of reproduction in body mass was caused by the reduced antler size. Our study is therefore consistent with the hypothesis that antlers in female Rangifer have evolved due to interference competition and provides evidence for antler growth as a cost of reproduction in females. Antler growth was constrained more by life history events than by variation in the environment, which contrasts markedly with studies on male antlers and horns, and hence increases our understanding of constraints on ornamentation and life history trade-offs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Albon SD et al (2017) Contrasting effects of summer and winter warming on body mass explain population dynamics in a food-limited Arctic herbivore. Glob Change Biol 23:1374–1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergerud AT (1976) Annual antler cycle in Newfoundland caribou. Can Field Nat 90:449–463

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bro-Jørgensen J (2007) The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids. Evolution 61:1316–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00111.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clutton-Brock TH (1982) The functions of antlers. Behaviour 79:108–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Harvey PH (1980) Antlers, body size and breeding group size in the Cervidae. Nature 285:565–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer. Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1988) Reproductive success in male and female red deer. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 325–343

    Google Scholar 

  10. Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Smith KG (1998) Horn growth in mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus). J Mammal 79:406–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Derocher AE, Wiik O, Bangjord G (2000) Predation of Svalbard reindeer by polar bears. Polar Biol 23:675–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Douhard M et al (2016) The influence of weather conditions during gestation on life histories in a wild Arctic ungulate. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Douhard M, Pigeon G, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW, Guillemette S, Pelletier F (2017) Environmental and evolutionary effects on horn growth of male bighorn sheep. Oikos 126:1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elvebakk A (2005) A vegetation map of Svalbard on the scale 1: 3.5 mill. Phytocoenologia 35:951–967. https://doi.org/10.1127/0340-269x/2005/0035-0951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Espmark Y (1964) Studies in dominance-subordination relationship in a group of semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Anim Behav 12:420–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Espmark Y (1971) Antler shedding in relation to parturition in female reindeer. J Wildl Manag 35:175–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/3799887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fancy SG, White RG (1985) Energy expenditures by caribou while cratering in snow. J Wildl Manag 49:987–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT (1998) Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW, Turelli L, Jorgenson JT (2004) Relative allocation to horn and body growth in bighorn rams varies with resource availability. Behav Ecol 15:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geist V (1966) Evolution of horn-like organs. Behaviour 27:175–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853966x00155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gould SJ (1992) Ever since darwin: reflections in natural history. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hamel S, Côté SD (2009) Foraging decisions in a capital breeder: trade-offs between mass gain and lactation. Oecologia 161:421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1377-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen BB, Aanes R, Saether BE (2010) Feeding-crater selection by high-arctic reindeer facing ice-blocked pastures. Can J Zool 88:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1139/z09-130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holand O et al (2004) Social rank in female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): effects of body mass, antler size and age. J Zool 263:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952836904005382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee A et al (2015) An integrated population model for a long-lived ungulate: more efficient data use with Bayesian methods. Oikos 124:806–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lefcheck JS (2016) piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol 7:573–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moen RA, Pastor J, Cohen Y (1999) Antler growth and extinction of Irish elk. Evol Ecol Res 1:235–249

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mysterud A, Meisingset E, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2005) Climate-dependent allocation of resources to secondary sexual traits in red deer. Oikos 111:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nordli O, Przybylak R, Ogilvie AEJ, Isaksen K (2014) Long-term temperature trends and variability on Spitsbergen: the extended Svalbard Airport temperature series, 1898–2012. Polar Res. https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v33.21349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Omsjø EH et al (2009) Evaluating capture stress and its effects on reproductive success in Svalbard reindeer. Can J Zool 87:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1139/z08-139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Packer C (1983) Sexual dimorphism: the horns of African antelopes. Science 221:1191–1193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Prichard AK, Finstad G, Shain DH (1999) Factors affecting velvet antler weights in free-ranging reindeer in Alaska. Rangifer 19:71–76. https://doi.org/10.7557/2.19.2.282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.3.1 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  35. Reimers E, Nordby O (1968) Relationships between age and tooth cementum layers in Norwegian reindeer. J Wildl Manag 32:957–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roberts SC (1996) The evolution of hornedness in female ruminants. Behaviour 133:399–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson MR, Kruuk LEB (2007) Function of weaponry in females: the use of horns in intrasexual competition for resources in female Soay sheep. Biol Let 3:651–654. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Robinson MR, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB (2006) Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep. Evolution 60:2168–2181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01854.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schaefer JA, Mahoney SP (2001) Antlers on female caribou: biogeography of the bones of contention. Ecology 82:3556–3560. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082%5b3556:aofcbo%5d2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmidt KT, Stien A, Albon SD, Guinness FE (2001) Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life history. Oecologia 127:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shipley B (2016) Cause and correlation in biology : a user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations, and causal inference with R, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  42. Skogland T (1989) Comparative social organization of wild reindeer in relation to food, mates and predator avoidance. Adv Ethol 29:1–74

    Google Scholar 

  43. Smith BL (1998) Antler size and winter mortality of elk: effects of environment, birth year, and parasites. J Mammal 79:1038–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stankowich T, Caro T (2009) Evolution of weaponry in female bovids. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:4329–4334. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stien A et al (2012) Congruent responses to weather variability in high arctic herbivores. Biol Lett 8:1002–1005. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0764

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Thalmann JC, Bowyer RT, Aho KA, Weckerly F, McCullough DR (2015) Antler and body size in black-tailed deer: an analysis of cohort effects. Adv Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/156041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Thomas D, Barry S (2005) Antler mass of barren-ground caribou relative to body condition and pregnancy rate. Arctic 58:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tveraa T, Stien A, Bårdsen BJ, Fauchald P (2013) Population densities, vegetation green-up, and plant productivity: impacts on reproductive success and juvenile body mass in reindeer. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tyler NJC (1987) Natural limitation of the abundance of the high arctic Svalbard reindeer. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge

  50. van der Wal R, Stien A (2014) High-arctic plants like it hot: a long-term investigation of between-year variability in plant biomass. Ecology 95:3414–3427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vanpé C et al (2007) Antler size provides an honest signal of male phenotypic quality in roe deer. Am Nat 169:481–493. https://doi.org/10.1086/512046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Veiberg V et al (2017) Maternal winter body mass and not spring phenology determine annual calf production in an Arctic herbivore. Oikos 126:980–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Weladji RB, Holand O, Steinheim G, Colman JE, Gjostein H, Kosmo A (2005) Sexual dimorphism and intercorhort variation in reindeer calf antler length is associated with density and weather. Oecologia 145:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Governor of Svalbard for permission to undertake the research. We are especially grateful to Steve Coulson, Mads Forchhammer and the logistical and technical staff at the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) for supporting the field campaigns. The work was supported mainly by grants from U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (GR3/1083), the Norwegian Research Council (POLARPROG project 216051 and KLIMAFORSK 267613) and the Macaulay Development Trust. We are grateful to Brage B. Hansen for providing antler mass data and to Jean-Michel Gaillard, Mark Hewison and one anonymous referee for providing valuable comments that greatly improved an earlier version of the manuscript.

Funding

Data will be archived on Dryad (http://datadryad.com/) following acceptance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LEL, SA, AS, JI, VV and ER managed the long-term Svalbard reindeer project, collected the data and conceived the idea for the study. GP and LEL did the analyses. LEL, AM and PEG wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leif Egil Loe.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Captures and handling of Svalbard reindeer were approved by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (permission number 17/237024) and by the Governor of Svalbard (permission number 16/01632-9).

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-Michel Gaillard.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 195 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loe, L.E., Pigeon, G., Albon, S.D. et al. Antler growth as a cost of reproduction in female reindeer. Oecologia 189, 601–609 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04347-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Horn
  • Interference competition
  • Rangifer
  • Svalbard reindeer
  • Trade-off