Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 187, Issue 4, pp 921–931 | Cite as

Does sexual dimorphism predispose dioecious riparian trees to sex ratio imbalances under climate change?

  • Kevin R. HultineEmail author
  • Susan E. Bush
  • Joy K. Ward
  • Todd E. Dawson
Special Topic

Abstract

Environmental changes have resulted in significant declines in native riparian forests that are comprised largely of dioecious tree taxa, including boxelder and iconic cottonwood/willow gallery forests. Dioecious species may be especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change given that they often exhibit skewed sex ratios that are reinforced by physiological and morphological specialization of each sex to specific microhabitats. A comprehensive data synthesis suggests that male individuals of boxelder and cottonwood taxa have a higher representation on dry microhabitats than females and are less physiologically sensitive to increased aridity than co-occurring females. Consequently, extreme male-biased sex ratios are possible under future climate conditions that could reduce population fitness below a sustainable threshold. Riparian willows, on the other hand, generally do not express obvious sexual dimorphism in habitat preference or physiological sensitivity to aridity. Thus, it is unclear whether climate change will impact population structure of willows in ways that parallel other dioecious riparian tree taxa. Future riparian tree restoration programs should aim to maintain future sex ratio balance that maximizes population fitness under projected hydro-climatological conditions. Recent advances in genomics will likely provide the critical tools for early sex determination in pre-reproductive trees across riparian tree species such that sex ratio balance could be targeted during initial stages of restoration, along with adaptations for drought tolerance and other key traits that are essential for survival under future conditions.

Keywords

Riparian cottonwoods Riparian willows Boxelder Leaf gas exchange Sex ratio bias 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s (Grant No. 1340856) MacroSystems Biology program awarded to KRH and grants awarded to JKW from the National Science Foundation’s Integrated Organismal Systems program. Additional financial support was provided to JKW by the University of Kansas.

Author contribution statement

KRH, JKW and TED originally formulated the idea for the manuscript. KRH conducted the literature review on dioecy patterns of gas exchange and growth, and wrote the text for the main body of the manuscript. KRH and SEB provided data for the manuscript and JKW provided comprehensive editorial input throughout the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2018_4190_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 52 kb)
442_2018_4190_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (56 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 55 kb)

References

  1. Alliende MC, Harper JL (1989) Demographic studies of a dioecious tree. I. Colonization, sex, and age structure of a population of Salix cinerea. J Ecol 77:1029–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderegg WRL, Anderegg LDL, Berry JA, Field CB (2014) Loss of whole-tree hydraulic conductance during severe drought and multi-year forest die-off. Oecologia 175:11–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Hidalgo HG, Bonfils C, Santer BD, Das T, Bala G, Wood AD, Nozawa T, Mirin AA, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2008) Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. USGS Staff—Published Research. Paper 211Google Scholar
  4. Braatne JH, Rood SB, Rood SB (1996) Life history, ecology, and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  5. Braatne JH, Jamieson R, Gill KM, Rood SB (2007) Instream flows and the decline of riparian cottonwoods and the Yakima River, Washington, USA. River Res Appl 23:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2006) Declining hydraulic efficiency as transpiring leaves desiccate: two types of response. Plant Cell Environ 29:2205–2215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown TB, Hultine KR, Steitzer H, Denny EG, Denslow MW, Granados J, Henderson S, Moore D, Nagai S, Sonnentag O, San Clements O, Sánchez-Azofeifa A, Tazik D, Richardson A (2016) Using phenocams to monitor our changing Earth: toward a global phenocam network. Front Ecol Environ 14:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Sternberg LDASL (2003) Dynamic changes in hydraulic conductivity in petioles of two savanna tree species: factors and mechanisms contributing to the refilling of embolized vessels. Plant Cell Environ 26:1633–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bull JJ, Charnov EL (1988) How fundamental are Fisherian sex ratios? Oxford Surv Evol Biol 5:96–135Google Scholar
  10. Che-Castaldo C, Crisafulli CM, Bishop JG, Fagan WF (2015) What causes female bias in the secondary sex ratios of the dioecious woody shrub Salix sitchensis colonizing a primary successional landscape? Am J Bot 102:1309–1322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen F, Chen L, Zhao H, Korpelainen H, Li C (2010a) Sex-specific responses and tolerance of Populus cathayana. Physiol Plant 140:163–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen L, Zhang S, Zhao H, Korpelainen H, Li C (2010b) Sex-related adaptive responses to interaction of drought and salinity in Populus yunnanensis. Plant Cell Environ 33:1767–1778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson TE, Bliss LC (1989) Patterns of water use and the tissue water relations in the dioecious shrub, Salix arctica: the physiological basis for habitat partitioning between the sexes. Oecologia 79:332–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR (1993) Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in box elder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74:798–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson TE, Geber MA (1999) Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and dimorphism of flowering plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawson TE, Ward JK, Ehleringer JR (2004) Temporal scaling of physiological responses from gas exchange to tree rings: a gender-specific study of Acer negundo (Boxelder) growing under different conditions. Funct Ecol 18:212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dering M, Raczka G, Szmyt J (2016) Sex-specific pattern of spatial genetic structure in dioecious and clonal tree species, Populus alba L. Tree Genet Genomes 12:70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-016-1028-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dudley LS (2006) Ecological correlates of sexual dimorphism in Salix glauca (Salicaceae). Am J Bot 93:1775–1783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Field DL, Pickup M, Barrett CH (2012) Comparative analysis of sex-ratio variation in dioecious flowering plants. Evolution 67:661–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher RA (1930) The genetic theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman DC, Klikoff LG, Harpor KT (1976) Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaudet M, Jorge V, Paulucci I, Beritognolo I, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Sabatti M (2007) Genetic linkage maps of Populus nigra L. including AFLP’s, SSRs, SNPs, and sex trait. Tree Genet Genomes 4:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gehring CA, Whitham TG (1992) Reduced mycorrhizae on Juniperus monosperma with mistletoe: the influence of environmental stress and tree gender on a plant parasite and a plant–fungal mutualism. Oecologia 89:298–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Geraldes A, Hefer CA, Capron A, Kolosova N, Martinez-Nuñez F, Soolanayakanahally RY, Stanton B, Guy RD, Mansfield SD, Douglas CJ, Cronk QCB (2015) Recent Y chromosome divergence despite ancient origin of dioecy in poplars (Populus). Mol Ecol 24:3243–3256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gom LA, Rood SB (1999a) The discrimination of cottonwood clones in a mature grove along the Oldman River in southern Alberta. Can J Bot 77:1084–1094Google Scholar
  26. Gom LA, Rood SB (1999b) Patterns of clonal occurrence in a mature cottonwood grove along the Oldman River, Alberta. Can J Bot 77:1095–1105Google Scholar
  27. Hanley SJ, Mallott MD, Karp A (2006) Alignment of a Salix linkage map to the Populus genomic sequence reveals macrosynteny between willow and poplar genomes. Tree Genet Genomes 3:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hart SC, DeLuca TH, Newman GS, MacKenzie MD, Boyle SI (2005) Post-fire vegetative dynamics as drivers of microbial community structure and function in forest soils. For Ecol Manag 220:166–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heilbuth JC (2000) Lower species richness in dioecious clades. Am Nat 156:221–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes FM, Johansson M, Xiong S, Carlborg D, Hawkins M, Svedmark A, Hayes A, Goodall A, Richards KS, Nilsson C (2010) The influence of hydrological regimes on sex ratios and spatial segregation of the sexes in two dioecious riparian shrub species in northern Sweden. Plant Ecol 208:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hultine KR, Bush SE, West AG, Ehleringer JR (2007) Population structure, physiology and ecohydrological impacts of dioecious riparian tree species of western North America. Oecologia 154:85–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hultine KR, Bush SE, West AG, Burtch KG, Pataki DE, Ehleringer JR (2008) Gender specific patterns of above ground allocation, canopy conductance and water use in a dominant riparian tree species. Tree Physiol 28:1383–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hultine KR, Bush SE, Ehleringer JR (2010) Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwood and willow before, during and after two years of soil water removal. Ecol Appl 20:347–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hultine KR, Burtch KG, Ehleringer JR (2013) Gender specific patterns of carbon uptake and water use in a dominant riparian tree species exposed to a warming climate. Glob Chang Biol 19:3390–3405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hultine KR, Grady KC, Wood TE, Shuster SM, Stella JC, Whitham TG (2016) Climate change perils for dioecious plant species. Nat Plants.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.109 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jing SW, Coley PD (1990) Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defenses in Acer negundo. Oikos 58:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaul RB, Kaul MN (1984) Sex ratios of Populus deltoids and Salix amygdaloides (Salicaceae) in Nebraska. Southwest Nat 29:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Landis TD, Dreesen DR, Dumroese RK (2003) Sex and the single Salix: considerations for riparian restoration. Nat Plants J 4:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lei Y, Chen K, Jiang H, Yu L, Duan B (2017) Contrasting responses in the growth and energy utilization properties of sympatric Populus and Salix to different altitudes: implications for sexual dimorphism in Salicaceae. Physiol Plant 159:30–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Letts MG, Phelan CA, Johnson DRE, Rood SB (2008) Seasonal photosynthetic gas exchange and leaf reflectance characteristics of male and female cottonwoods in a riparian woodland. Tree Physiol 28:1037–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Leung LB, Qian Y, Bian X, Washington WM, Han J, Roads JO (2004) Mid-century ensemble regional climate change scenarios for the western United States. Clim Chang 62:75–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li Y, Duan B, Chen J, Korpelainen H, Niinemets Ü, Li C (2016) Males exhibit competitive advantages over females of Populus deltoides under salinity stress. Tree Physiol 36:1573–1584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Markussen T, Pakull B, Fladung M (2007) Positioning of sex-correlated markers for Populus in an AFLP- and SSR-marker based genetic map of Populus tremula X tremuloides. Silvae Genet 56:180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martinez-Vilalta J, Piñol J, Beven K (2002) Hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. Ecol Model 155:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. McKown AD, Klápštê J, Guy RD, Soolanayakanahally RY, La Mantia J, Porth I, Skyba O, Unda F, Douglas CJ, El-Kassaby YA, Hamelin RC, Mansfield SD, Cronk QCB (2017) Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01893-z PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merritt DM, Poff NL (2010) Shifting dominance of riparian Populus and Tamarix along gradients of flow alteration in western North America rivers. Ecol Appl 20:135–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Myers-Smith IH, Hik DS (2012) Uniform female-bases sex ratios in alpine meadows. Am J Bot 99:1243–1248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nielson JL, Rood SB, Pearce DW, Letts MG, Jiskoot H (2010) Streamside trees: response of male, female and hybrid cottonwoods to flooding. Tree Physiol 30:1479–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nippert JB, Butler JJ Jr, Kluitenberg GJ, Whittemore DO, Arnold D, Spal SE, Ward JK (2010) Patterns of Tamarix water use during a record drought. Oecologia 162:283–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ottenbreit KA, Staniforth RJ (1992) Life cycle and age structure of ramets in an expanding population of Salix exigua (sandbar willow). Can J Bot Revue Canadienne De Botanique 70:1141–1146Google Scholar
  54. Petry WK, Perry KI, Fremgen A, Rudeen SK, Lopez M, Dryburgh J, Mooney KA (2013) Mechanisms underlying plant sexual dimorphism in multi-trophic arthropod communities. Ecology 94:2055–2065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Petzold A, Pfeiffer T, Jansen F, Eusemann Schnittler M (2013) Sex ratios and clonal growth in dioecious Populus euphratica Oliv., Xinjang Prov., Western China. Trees Struct Funct 27:729–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plaut JA, Yepez EA, Hill J, Pangle R, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, McDowell NG (2012) Hydraulic limits preceding mortality in a piñon–juniper woodland under experimental drought. Plant Cell Environ 35:1601–1617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Randriamanana TR, Nissinen K, Moilanen J, Nybakken L, Julkunen-Tiitto R (2015) Long-term UV-B and temperature enhancements suggest that females of Salix myrsinifolia plants are more tolerant to UV-B than males. Environ Exp Bot 109:296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Renner SS, Rickefs RE (1995) Dioecy correlates in the flowering plants. Am J Bot 82:596–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rood SB, Ball DJ, Gill KM, Kaluthota S, Letts MG, Pearce DW (2013) Hydrological linkages between a climate oscillation, river flows, growth, and wood Δ13C of male and female cottonwood trees. Plant Cell Environ 36:984–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rood SB, Goater LA, McCaffrey D, Montgomery JS, Hopkinson C, Pearce DW (2017) Growth of riparian cottonwoods: heterosis in some intersectional Populus hybrids and clonal expansion of females. Trees Struct Funct 31:1069–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rowland DL, Johnson NC (2001) Sexual demographics of riparian populations of Populus deltoids: can mortality be predicted from change in reproductive status? Can J Bot 79:702–710Google Scholar
  62. Rowland DL, Garner ER, Jespersen M (2002) A rare occurrence of seed formation on male branches of the dioecious tree, Populus deltoides. Am Midl Nat 147:185–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salleo S, Trifilo P, Esposito S, Nardini A, LoGullo M (2009) Starch-to-sugar conversion in wood parenchyma of field-growing Laurus nobilis plants: a component of the signal pathway for embolism repair. Funct Plant Biol 36:815–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushner Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau NC, Li C, Velez J, Naik N (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316:1181–1184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sevanto S, McDowell NG, Dickman TL, Pangle R, Pockman WT (2014) How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ 37:153–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Shafroth PB, Scott ML, Friedman JM, Laven RD (1994) Establishment, sex structure and breeding system of an erotic riparian willow, Salix x rubens. Am Midl Nat 132:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sinclair JR, Emlen J, Freeman DC (2012) Biased sex ratios in plants: theory and trends. Bot Rev 78:63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Snyder KA, Williams DG (2000) Water sources used by riparian trees varies among stream types on the San Pedro River, Arizona. Agric For Meteorol 105:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sperry JS, Love DM (2015) What plant hydraulics can tell us about responses to climate-change droughts. New Phytol 207:14–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Stanton BJ, Villar M (1996) Controlled reproduction in Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  71. Stella JC, Battles JJ, Orr BK, McBride JR (2006) Synchrony of seed dispersal, hydrology, and local climate in a semiarid river reach in California. Ecosystems 9:1200–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stella JC, Battles JJ, McBride JR, Orr BK (2010) Riparian seedling mortality from a simulated water table recession, and the design of sustainable flow regimes on regulated rivers. Res Ecol 18:284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2004) Changes in snowmelt runoff timing in western North America under a ‘business as usual’ climate change scenario. Climatic Change 62:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stromberg JC (1993) Fremont cottonwood-Gooding willow riparian forests: a review of their ecology, threats, and recovery potential. J Ariz Nev Acad Sci 26:97–111Google Scholar
  75. Stromberg JC, Lite SJ, Marler R, Paradzick C, Shafroth PB, Shorrock D, White JM, White MS (2007) Altered stream-flow regimes and invasive plant species: the Tamarix case. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A et al (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313:1596–1604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Ueno N, Suyama Y, Seiwa K (2007) What makes the sex ratio female-biased in the dioecious tree Salix sachalinensis. J Ecol 95:951–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vandepitte K, Roldan-Ruiz I, Leus L, Jacquemyn H, Honnay O (2009) Canopy closure shapes clonal diversity in fine-scale genetic structure in the dioecious understory perennial Mercurialis perennis. J Ecol 97:404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Varga S, Kytöviita MM (2010) Gender dimorphism and mycorrhizal symbiosis affect floral visitors and reproductive output in Geranium sylvaticum. Funct Ecol 24:750–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vilagrosa A, Morales F, Abadía A, Bellot J, Cochard H, Gil-Pelegrin E (2010) Are symplast tolerance to intense drought conditions and xylem vulnerability to cavitation coordinated? An integrated analysis of photosynthetic, hydraulic and leaf level processes in two Mediterranean drought-resistant species. Environ Exp Bot 69:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wade MJ, Shuster SM, Demuth JP (2003) Sexual selection favors female-biases sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection. Am Nat 162:403–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Ward JK, Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR (2002) Response of Acer negundo genders to interannual differences in water availability determined from carbon isotope ratios of tree ring cellulose. Tree Physiol 22:339–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Xu X, Peng G, Wu C, Korpelainen H, Li C (2008) Sex-specific responses of Populus cathayana to drought and elevated temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 31:850–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yin T, DiFazio S, Gunter LE, Zhang X, Sewell MM, Woolbright SA, Allan GJ, Kelleher CT, Douglas CJ, Wang M, Tuskan GA (2008) Genome structure and emerging evidence of an incipient sex chromosome in Populus. Genome Res 18:422–430CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang Y, Feng L, Jiang H, Zhang Y, Zhang S (2017) Different proteome profiles between male and female Populus cathayana exposed to UV-B radiation. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpis.2017.00320 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM (2009) Confronting Maxwell’s demon: biophysics of xylem repair. Trends Plant Sci 14:530–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin R. Hultine
    • 1
    Email author
  • Susan E. Bush
    • 1
  • Joy K. Ward
    • 2
  • Todd E. Dawson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Research, Conservation and CollectionsDesert Botanical GardenPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations