Oecologia

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Tolerance of subzero winter cold in kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata)

  • Heather A. Coiner
  • Katharine Hayhoe
  • Lewis H. Ziska
  • Jeff Van Dorn
  • Rowan F. Sage
Global change ecology – original research

Abstract

The use of species distribution as a climate proxy for ecological forecasting is thought to be acceptable for invasive species. Kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata) is an important invasive whose northern distribution appears to be limited by winter survival; however, kudzu’s cold tolerance thresholds are uncertain. Here, we used biogeographic evidence to hypothesize that exposure to − 20 °C is lethal for kudzu and thus determines its northern distribution limit. We evaluated this hypothesis using survival tests and electrolyte leakage to determine relative conductivity, a measure of cell damage, on 14 populations from eastern North America. Relative conductivity above 36% was lethal. Temperatures causing this damage averaged − 19.6 °C for northern and − 14.4 °C for southern populations, indicating kudzu acclimates to winter cold. To assess this, we measured relative conductivity of above- and belowground stems, and roots collected throughout the winter at a kudzu population in southern Ontario, Canada. Consistent with acclimation, the cold tolerance threshold of aboveground stems at the coldest time of year was − 26 °C, while stems insulated from cold extremes survived to − 17 °C—colder than the survival limits indicated by kudzu’s biogeographic distribution. While these results do not rule out alternative cold limitations, they indicate kudzu can survive winters north of its current distribution. For kudzu, biogeography is not a proxy for climatic tolerance and continued northward migration is possible. Efforts to limit its spread are therefore prudent. These results demonstrate that physiological constraints inform predictions of climate-related changes in species distribution and should be considered where possible.

Keywords

Freezing tolerance Global warming Invasive species Species distributions Thermal acclimation Climate equilibrium Niche shift 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Karen Castro and the many other people who helped us locate and compile kudzu sites, and to Jessamyn Manson, Patrick Friesen, Murilo Peixoto, Florian Busch, and Jerri Lee, who assisted with field work. This work was supported by a Discovery Grant from the National Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada to RFS, by an Invasive Species Centre Partnership Fund grant to RFS and HAC from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and by graduate fellowships to HAC from the Ontario Ministry of Education and the University of Toronto.

Author contribution statement

HC designed and performed the experiments and data analysis, KH and JVD analyzed the climate data, LZ and RS conceived of the study, and LZ assisted with the Maryland collections and experiments. HC and RS wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

442_2018_4157_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (914 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 913 kb)

References

  1. Abramovitz JN (1983) Pueraria lobata Willd. (Ohwi), Kudzu: limitations to sexual reproduction. University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderman DH (2001) Kudzu: a tale of two vines. South Cult 7:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen DJ, Ort DR (2001) Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants. Trends Plant Sci 6:36–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey RY (1939) Kudzu for erosion control in the Southeast. Farmers Bull No. 1840Google Scholar
  5. Bentley KE, Mauricio R (2016) High degree of clonal reproduction and lack of large-scale geographic patterning mark the introduced range of the invasive vine, kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata), in North America. Am J Bot 103:1499–1507.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500434 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry J, Bjorkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 31:491–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosci T, Allen JM, Bellemare J et al (2016) Plants’ native distributions do not reflect climatic tolerance. Divers Distrib 22:615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley BA (2009) Regional analysis of the impacts of climate change on cheatgrass invasion shows potential risk and opportunity. Glob Change Biol 15:196–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley BA, Wilcove DS, Oppenheimer M (2010) Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States. Biol Invasions 12:1855–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bykova O, Sage RF (2012) Winter cold tolerance and the geographic range separation of Bromus tectorum and Bromus rubens, two severe invasive species in North America. Glob Change Biol 18:3654–3663.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callen ST, Miller AJ (2015) Signatures of niche conservatism and niche shift in the North American kudzu (Pueraria montana) invasion. Divers Distrib 21:853–863.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coiner HA (2012) The role of low temperatures in determining the northern range limit of kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata), an invasive vine in North America. PhD Dissertation, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. Early R, Sax DF (2014) Climatic niche shifts between species’ native and naturalized ranges raise concern for ecological forecasts during invasions and climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1356–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischlin A, Midgley GF, Price J, Leemans R, Gopal B, Turley C, Rounsevell M, Dube P, Tarazona J, Velichko A (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 212–272Google Scholar
  15. Follak S (2011) Potential distribution and environmental threat of Pueraria lobata. Cent Eur J Biol 6:1–10Google Scholar
  16. Forseth IN, Innis AF (2004) Kudzu (Pueraria montana): history, physiology, and ecology combine to make a major ecosystem threat. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frankel E (1989) Distribution of Pueraria lobata in and around New York City. Bull Torrey Bot Club 116:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GBIF (2008) Global biodiversity information facility data portal. http://www.gbif.org
  19. Gusta LV (2003) Factors to consider in artificial freeze tests. Acta Hortic ISHS 618:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallam PM, Tibbits WN (1988) Determination of frost hardiness of eucalyptus using the electrical-conductivity of diffusate in conjunction with a freezing chamber. Can J For Res 18:595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM (2007) Generalized linear models and extensions. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  22. Helmuth B, Broitman BR, Yamane L et al (2010) Organismal climatology: analyzing environmental variability at scales relevant to physiological stress. J Exp Biol 213:995–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Henry HAL (2007) Soil freeze-thaw cycle experiments: trends, methodological weaknesses and suggested improvements. Soil Biol Biochem 39:977–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henry HAL (2008) Climate change and soil freezing dynamics: historical trends and projected changes. Clim Change 87:421–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hickman JE, Wu S, Mickley LJ, Lerdau MT (2010) Kudzu (Pueraria montana) invasion doubles emissions of nitric oxide and increases ozone pollution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:10115–10119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodkinson DJ, Thompson K (1997) Plant dispersal: the role of man. J Appl Ecol 34:1484–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ (2009) Near term climate projections for invasive species distributions. Biol Invasions 11:1373–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalberer SR, Wisniewski M, Arora R (2006) Deacclimation and reacclimation of cold-hardy plants: current understanding and emerging concepts. Plant Sci 171:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kartzinel TR, Hamrick JL, Wang C et al (2015) Heterogeneity of clonal patterns among patches of kudzu, Pueraria montana var. lobata, an invasive plant. Ann Bot 116:739–750.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv117 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kearney M, Phillips BL, Tracy CR et al (2008) Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates. Ecography 31:423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindgren CJ, Castro KL, Coiner HA et al (2013) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 12. Pueraria montana var. lobata (Willd.) Sanjappa and Predeep. Can J Plant Sci 93:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long SP, Humphries S, Falkowski PG (1994) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:633–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martyn D (1992) Climates of the World. Polish Scientific Publishers Ltd, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  35. Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nussen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Clim 15:3237–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McClain WE, Shimp J, Esker TL et al (2006) Distribution and reproductive potential of kudzu (Pueraria lobata, Fabaceae) in Illinois, USA. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 99:17–30Google Scholar
  37. Mehrhoff LJ, Silander JA, Leicht SA, et al (2003) IPANE: Invasive Plant Atlas of New England. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. http://www.ipane.org
  38. Pappert RA, Hamrick JL, Donovan LA (2000) Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. Am J Bot 87:1240–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Peixoto M, Sage RF (2016) Improved experimental protocols to evaluate cold tolerance thresholds in Miscanthus and switchgrass rhizomes. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 8:257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peixoto M, Friesen PC, Sage RF (2015) Winter cold-tolerance thresholds in field-grown Miscanthus hybrid rhizomes. J Exp Bot 66:4415–4425.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv093 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Petitpierre B, Kueffer C, Broennimann O et al (2012) Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 335:1344–1348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rawlins KA, Griffin JE, Moorhead DJ, Bargeron CT, Evans CW (2011) EDDMapS: invasive plant mapping handbook. The University of Georgia, Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, Tifton, GA. 32 pGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. ViennaGoogle Scholar
  44. Sakai A, Larcher W (1987) Frost survival of plants. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sasek TW, Strain BR (1990) Implications of atmospheric CO2 enrichment and climatic change for the geographical distribution of two introduced vines in the USA. Clim Change 16:31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shurtleff W, Aoyagi A (1985) The book of kudzu: A Culinary and Healing Guide. Avery Publishing Group, WayneGoogle Scholar
  47. Sorrie BA, Perkins WD (1988) Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) in New England. Rhodora 90:341–343Google Scholar
  48. Steponkus PL (1983) Freezing-injury and cold-acclimation—an integration from a membrane perspective. Cryobiology 20:722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sun JH, Li ZC, Jewett DK et al (2005) Genetic diversity of Pueraria lobata (kudzu) and closely related taxa as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat analysis. Weed Res 45:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Svenning J, Skov F (2004) Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecol Lett 7:565–573.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00614.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tingley R, Vallinoto M, Sequeira F, Kearney MR (2014) Realized niche shift during a global biological invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:10233–10238.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405766111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Tropicos (2008) Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. http://www.tropicos.org
  53. USDA N (2012) The plants database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
  54. Usda-Ars C (1971) Common weeds of the United States. Dover Publications Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Waldron GE, Larson BMH (2012) Kudzu vine, Pueraria montana, adventive in Southern Ontario. Can Field-Nat 126:31–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. William C (1924) Kudzu, a failure in Ohio. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 382Google Scholar
  57. Winberry JJ, Jones DM (1973) Rise and decline of the “miracle vine”: kudzu in the southern landscape. Southeast Geogr 13:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolfe DW, Ziska L, Petzoldt C et al (2008) Projected change in climate thresholds in the northeastern U.S.: implications for crops, pests, livestock, and farmers. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13:555–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ziska LH, McConnell LL (2016) Climate change, carbon dioxide, and pest biology: monitor, mitigate, manage. J Agric Food Chem 64:6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf506101h CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Ziska LH, Blumenthal DM, Runion GB et al (2011) Invasive species and climate change: an agronomic perspective. Clim Change 105:13–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Climate Science Center, Texas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  3. 3.ATMOS Research and ConsultingLubbockUSA
  4. 4.United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service, Adaptive Cropping Systems LaboratoryBeltsvilleUSA
  5. 5.Department of Pediatrics, Center for Better BeginningsUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations