, Volume 187, Issue 1, pp 333–342 | Cite as

Short-term responses to warming vary between native vs. exotic species and with latitude in an early successional plant community

  • Kileigh B. WelshoferEmail author
  • Phoebe L. Zarnetske
  • Nina K. Lany
  • Quentin D. Read
Global change ecology – original research


Climate change is expected to favor exotic plant species over native species, because exotics tend to have wider climatic tolerances and greater phenological plasticity, and also because climate change may intensify enemy release. Here, we examine direct effects of warming (+ 1.8 °C above ambient) on plant abundance and phenology, as well as indirect effects of warming propagated through herbivores, in two heavily invaded plant communities in Michigan, USA, separated by approximately three degrees latitude. At the northern site, warming increased exotic plant abundance by 19% but decreased native plant abundance by 31%, indicating that exotic species may be favored in a warmer world. Warming also resulted in earlier spring green-up (1.65 ± 0.77 days), earlier flowering (2.18 ± 0.92 days), and greater damage by herbivores (twofold increase), affecting exotic and native species equally. Contrary to expectations, native and exotic plants experienced similar amounts of herbivory. Warming did not have strong ecological effects at the southern site, only resulting in a delay of flowering time by 2.42 ± 0.83 days for both native and exotic species. Consistent with the enemy release hypothesis, exotic plants experienced less herbivory than native plants at the southern site. Herbivory was lower under warming for both exotic and native species at the southern site. Thus, climate warming may favor exotic over native plant species, but the response is likely to depend on additional environmental and individual species’ traits.


Climate change Global warming Invasive species Open-top chamber Plant community ecology 



KBW was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) and Michigan State University (MSU) Plant Sciences Fellowship. PLZ was supported by MSU and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project 1010055. QDR was supported by MSU. NKL was supported by the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation and MSU. We thank MSU’s Forestry Department, Kellogg Biological Station and their Long-Term Ecological Research Station (NSF DEB 1027253), and the University of Michigan Biological Station for providing support for research equipment, travel, and housing. Many thanks to Tori Niewohner, Patrick Duffy, and Matt Chansler for their indispensable help in the field.

Author contribution statement

KBW and PLZ conceived and designed the experiments. KBW performed the experiments. KBW, NKL, and QDR analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors provided editorial advice.

Supplementary material

442_2018_4111_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (730 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 729 kb)


  1. Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3(1):52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH, Hollister RD, Jónsdóttir IS, Laine K, Lévesque E, Marion GM, Molau U, Mølgaard P, Nordenhäll U, Raszhivin V, Robinson CH, Starr G, Stenström A, Stenström M, Totland Ø, Turner PL, Walker LJ, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wookey PA (1999) Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: metal-analysis of the International Tundra Experiment. Ecol Monogr 69:491–511Google Scholar
  3. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, Butterfield J, Buse A, Coulson JC, Farrar J, Good JEG, Harrington R, Hartley S, Jones TH, Lindroth RL, Press MC, Symrnioudis I, Watt AD, Whittaker JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob Chang Biol 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blois JL, Zarnetske PL, Fitzpatrick MC, Finnegan S (2013) Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341(6145):499–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3):127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Lind EM, Adler PB, Alberti J, Anderson TM, Bakker JD, Biederman L, Blumenthal D, Brown CS, Brudvig LA, Buckley YM, Cadotte M, Chu C, Cleland EE, Crawley MJ, Daleo P, Damschen EI, Davies KF, Decrappeo NM, Du G, Firn J, Hautier Y, Heckman RW, Hector A, Hillerislambers J, Iribarne O, Klein JA, Knops JMH, La Pierre KJ, Leakey ADB, Li W, MacDougall AS, McCulley RL, Melbourne BA, Mitchell CE, Moore JL, Mortensen B, O’Halloran LR, Orrock JL, Pascual J, Prober SM, Pyke DA, Risch AC, Schuetz M, Smith MD, Stevens CJ, Sullivan LL, Williams RJ, Wragg PD, Wright JP, Yang LH (2014) Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation. Nature 508(7497):517–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Wilcove DS, Ziska LH (2010) Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends Ecol Evol 25(5):310–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bremm C, Carvalho PCF, Fonseca L, Amaral GA, Mezzalira JC, Perez NB, Nabinger C, Laca EA (2016) Diet switching by mammalian herbivores in response to exotic grass invasion. PLoS One 11(2):e0150167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Calinger KM, Queenborough S, Curtis PS (2013) Herbarium specimens reveal the footprint of climate change on flowering trends across north-central North America. Ecol Lett 16(8):1037–1044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers JC, Germino MJ, Belnap J, Brown CS, Schupp EW, Clair SBS (2016) Plant Community resistance to invasion by Bromus species: the roles of community attributes, Bromus interactions with plant communities, and Bromus traits. In: Germino MJ, Chambers JC, Brown CS (eds) Exotic brome-grasses in arid and semiarid ecosystems of the western US. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesson P, Huntly N (1989) Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 4(10):293–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies KW (2011) Plant community diversity and native plant abundance decline with increasing abundance of an exotic annual grass. Oecologia 167(2):481–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dijkstra FA, Pendall E, Morgan JA, Blumenthal DM, Carrillo Y, LeCain DR, Follett RF, Williams DG (2012) Climate change alters stoichiometry of phosphorus and nitrogen in a semiarid grassland. New Phytol 196(3):807–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dukes JS (2010) Responses of Invasive Species to a Changing Climate and Atmosphere. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14(4):135–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunnell KL, Travers SE (2011) Shifts in the flowering phenology of the northern Great Plains: patterns over 100 years. Am J Bot 98(6):935–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants (University of Chicago Press). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fey SB, Herren CM (2014) Temperature-mediated biotic interactions influence enemy release of nonnative species in warming environments. Ecology 95(8):2246–2256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fridley JD (2012) Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions. Nature 485(7398):359–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fridley JD, Lynn JS, Grime JP, Askew AP (2016) Longer growing seasons shift grassland vegetation towards more-productive species. Nat Clim Chang 6(9):865–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillooly JF (2001) Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate. Science 293(5538):2248–2251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Green JL, Capizzi J, Maloy O (1990) A systematic approach to diagnosing plant damage. Oregon State University Extension Ornamentals Northwest Archive 13(6):ii–24Google Scholar
  24. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22(3):534–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbold B, Moyle PB (1986) Introduced species and vacant niches. Am Nat 128(5):751–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillebrand H, Borer ET, Bracken MES, Cardinale BJ, Cebrian J, Cleland EE, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Stanley Harpole W, Ngai JT, Sandin S, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE, Smith MD (2009) Herbivore metabolism and stoichiometry each constrain herbivory at different organizational scales across ecosystems. Ecol Lett 12(6):516–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kazan K, Lyons R (2016) The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 67(1):47–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Keane R, Crawley M (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17(4):164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu X, Siemann E, Wei H, Shao X, Ding J (2015) Effects of warming and nitrogen on above- and below-ground herbivory of an exotic invasive plant and its native congener. Biol Invasions 17(10):2881–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma Z, Liu H, Mi Z, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Xu W, Jiang L, He J-S (2017) Climate warming reduces the temporal stability of plant community biomass production. Nat Commun 8:15378CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Magnuson JJ (1990) Long-term ecological research and the invisible present. Bioscience 40(7):495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matesanz S, Gianoli E, Valladares F (2010) Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants: global change and plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1206(1):35–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Matteodo M, Wipf S, Stöckli V, Rixen C, Vittoz P (2013) Elevation gradient of successful plant traits for colonizing alpine summits under climate change. Environ Res Lett 8(2):024043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Menne MJ, Durre I, Korzeniewski B, McNeill S, Thomas K, Yin X, Anthony S, Ray R, Vose RS, Gleason BE, Houston TG (2012a) Global historical climatology network—daily (GHCN-Daily), Version 3. NOAA National Climatic Data CenterGoogle Scholar
  35. Menne MJ, Durre I, Vose RS, Gleason BE, Houston TG (2012b) An overview of the global historical climatology network-daily database. J Atmos Ocean Technol 29(7):897–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molau U, Mølgaard P (1996) ITEX manual, 2nd edn. Danish Polar Center, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  37. Munier A, Hermanutz L, Jacobs JD, Lewis K (2010) The interacting effects of temperature, ground disturbance, and herbivory on seedling establishment: implications for treeline advance with climate warming. Plant Ecol 210(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pandey P, Ramegowda V, Senthil-Kumar M (2015) Shared and unique responses of plants to multiple individual stresses and stress combinations: physiological and molecular mechanisms. Front Plant Sci 6:723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Post ES (2013) Ecology of climate change: the importance of biotic interactions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Accessed 9 Sept 2016
  41. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9(8):981–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rustad L, Campbell J, Marion G, Norby R, Mitchell M, Hartley A, Cornelissen J, Gurevitch J (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126(4):543–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sandel B, Dangremond EM (2012) Climate change and the invasion of California by grasses. Glob Change Biol 18(1):277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sardans J, Rivas-Ubach A, Peñuelas J (2012) The C:N: P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: a review and perspectives. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14(1):33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Savin R, Nicolas ME (1996) Effects of short periods of drought and high temperature on grain growth and starch accumulation of two malting barley cultivars. Aust J Plant Physiol 23(2):201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Schultheis EH, Berardi AE, Lau JA (2015) No release for the wicked: enemy release is dynamic and not associated with invasiveness. Ecology 96(9):2446–2457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shriver RK (2016) Quantifying how short-term environmental variation leads to long-term demographic responses to climate change. J Ecol 104(1):65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simberloff D (2013) Invasive species: what everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: invasional Meltdown? Biol Invasions 1(1):21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stachowicz JJ, Terwin JR, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (2002) Nonlinear partial differential equations and applications: linking climate change and biological invasions: Ocean warming facilitates nonindigenous species invasions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(24):15497–15500CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176(2):256–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tilman D (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat 125(6):827–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turbelin AJ, Malamud BD, Francis RA (2017) Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: patterns of invasion and policy responses: mapping the global state of invasive alien species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26(1):78–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. USDA, NRCS (2006) The PLANTS Database ( National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. Accessed 6 Mar 2006
  56. Van der Putten WH, Macel M, Visser ME (2010) Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1549):2025–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vile D, Pervent M, Belluau M, Vasseur F, Bresson J, Muller B, Granier C, Simonneau T (2012) Arabidopsis growth under prolonged high temperature and water deficit: independent or interactive effects? Plant Cell Environ 35:702–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Welshofer KB, Zarnetske PL, Lany NK, Thompson LAE (2018) Open-top chambers for temperature manipulation in taller-stature plant communities. Methods Ecol Evol 9:254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams AL, Wills KE, Janes JK, Vander Schoor JK, Newton PCD, Hovenden MJ (2007) Warming and free-air CO2 enrichment alter demographics in four co-occurring grassland species. New Phytol 176:365–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Williamson MH (1996) Biological invasions, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Willis C, Ruhfel B, Primack R, Abraham J, Davis C (2008) Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau’s woods are driven by climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(44):17029–17033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolkovich EM, Cleland EE (2011) The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective. Front Ecol Environ 9(5):287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolkovich EM, Davies TJ, Schaefer H, Cleland EE, Cook BI, Travers SE, Davis CC (2013) Temperature-dependent shifts in phenology contribute to the success of exotic species with climate change. Am J Bot 100(7):1407–1421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ForestryMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior ProgramMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations