Shifts in the importance of the species pool and environmental controls of epiphytic bryophyte richness across multiple scales
Species richness is influenced by a nested set of environmental factors, but how do these factors interact across several scales? Our main aim is to disentangle the relative importance of environmental filters and the species pool on the richness of epiphytic bryophytes across spatial scales. To do so, we sampled epiphytic bryophytes in 43 oak forests across the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula. As predictors we used climate, descriptors of forest structure and micro-environment. We applied structural equation modeling to relate these variables with richness and cover at three scales: locality (forest), stand (three stands per forest), and sample (a quadrate in a tree). We assumed top–down relationships, so that large-scale variables influenced lower scale variables, and in which cover directly influenced richness. Richness at the next larger scale (locality to stand and stand to sample) is considered a surrogate of the species pool and included as a predictor of richness at the next smaller scale. Environmental variables explain locality richness, but as we decrease the spatial scale, its importance decreases and the dependence on species pool increases. In addition, we found unexpected bottom–up relationships (between micro-scale environment to locality richness). Our results point to the scale dependence of niche vs. neutral processes: niche processes are important at the locality (forest) scale, while neutral processes are significant at the small (sample) scale. We propose a modified conceptualization of the factors influencing biodiversity at different spatial scales by adding links across different scales (between micro-environment and locality-scale richness in our study).
KeywordsPlant Diversity Neutral processes Regional species pool Scale
This research has been funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Grants CGL2007-61389, CGL2010-15693 and CGL2011-28857). JH is supported by a Spanish Dirección General de Ciencia y Tecnología (DGCyT) Ramón y Cajal Grant. NGM is supported by the Grant AP2007-00905 of the Spanish Ministry of Science. We would like to thank two anonymous referees for their thorough review and constructive comments.
Author contribution statement
NGM, FL, JH, and VM originally formulated the idea; NGM and VM conducted fieldwork; NGM and MAB analyzed the data; NGM lead the writing process; FL, JH, MAB, and VM actively contributed to discuss the results and write the manuscript.
- Albertos B (2001) Estudio biogeográfico de los briófitos epífitos del noroccidente peninsular. PhD dissertation, Department of Biology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Aranda SC, Gabriel R, Borges PAV, Santos AMC, Hortal J, Baselga A, Lobo JM (2013) How do different dispersal modes shape the species–area relationship? Evidence for between-group coherence in the Macaronesian flora. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barkman JJ (1958) On the ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- de Bello F, Fibich P, Zelený D, Kopecký M, Mudrák O, Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Wild J, Michalcová D, Sádlo J, Šmilauer P, Lepš J, Pärtel M (2016) Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates. Ecol Evol 6:4088–4101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2169 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ewald J, Økland RH (2002) A probabilistic approach to estimating species pools from large compositional matrices. J Veg Sci 13:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1658/1100-9233(2002)013[0191:apates]2.0.co;2Google Scholar
- Gignac LD, Dale MRT (2005) Effects of fragment size and habitat heterogeneity on cryptogam diversity in the low-boreal forest of western Canada. Bryologist 108:50–66. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2005)108[50:eofsah]2.0.co;2Google Scholar
- González-Mancebo JM, Losada-Lima A, Llorente JP (2004) Forest floor bryophytes of laurel forest in Gomera (Canary Islands): life strategies and influence of the tree species. Lindbergia 29:5–16Google Scholar
- Grace JB, Michael Anderson T, Smith MD, Seabloom E, Andelman SJ, Meche G, Weiher E, Allain LK, Jutila H, Sankaran M, Knops J, Ritchie M, Willig MR (2007) Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecol Lett 10:680–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01058.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL (2006) WorldClim Global Climate Layers Version 1.4. Available at https://www.worldclim.org
- Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Ingerpuu N, Vellak K, Liira J, Pärtel M (2003) Relationships between species richness patterns in deciduous forests at the north Estonian limestone escarpment. J Veg Sci 14:773–780. https://doi.org/10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0773:rbsrpi]2.0.co;2Google Scholar
- Lara F (1993) Estudio biogeográfico de los briófitos epífitos de los melojares del Sistema Central Oriental (Sierras de Gredos, Guadarrama y Ayllón). PhD dissertation, Department of Biology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Lara F, Mazimpaka V (1998) Succession of epiphytic bryophytes in a Quercus pyrenaica forest from the Spanish Central Range (Iberian Peninsula). Nova Hedwigia 67:125–138Google Scholar
- Mazimpaka V, Lara F (1995) Corticolous bryophytes on Quercus pyrenaica forests from Gredos Mountains (spain): vertical distribution and affinity for epiphytic habitats. Nova Hedwigia 61:431–446Google Scholar
- Medina NG, Lara F, Mazimpaka V, Albertos B, Alonso I, Hortal J (2015) Epiphytic bryophytes of forests in Central and North inland Iberian Peninsula. Front Biogeogr 7:1–8Google Scholar
- Raabe S, Mueller J, Manthey M, Duerhammer O, Teuber U, Goettlein A, Foerster B, Brandl R, Baessler C (2010) Drivers of bryophyte diversity allow implications for forest management with a focus on climate change. For Ecol Manage 260:1956–1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rambo TR (2001) Decaying logs and habitat heterogeneity: implications for bryophyte diversity in Western Oregon forests. Northwest Sci 75:270–277Google Scholar
- Ros RM, Mazimpaka V, Abou-Salama U, Aleffi M, Blockeel TL, Brugués M, Cano MJ, Cros RM, Dia MG, Dirkse GM, El-Saadawi W, Erdağ A, Ganeva A, Gonzalez-Mancebo JM, Herrnstadt I, Khalil K, Kurschner H, Lanfranco E, Losada-Lima A, Refai MS, Rodriguez-Nuñez S, Sabovljević M, Sergio C, Shabbara HM, Sim-Sim M, Soderström L (2007) Hepatics and Anthocerotes of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist. Cryptogam Bryol 28:351–437Google Scholar