Effects of intraspecific and intra-individual differences in plant quality on preference and performance of monophagous aphid species

Jakobs, Ruth; Müller, Caroline

doi:10.1007/s00442-017-3998-x

Plant-microbe-animal interactions - original research
Published: 15 November 2017

Effects of intraspecific and intra-individual differences in plant quality on preference and performance of monophagous aphid species

Ruth Jakobs¹ &
Caroline Müller¹

Oecologia volume 186, pages 173–184 (2018)Cite this article

754 Accesses
18 Citations
Metrics details

Abstract

Plant chemistry is one of the main drivers of herbivore distribution. Monophagous herbivore species are highly specialized, but even within their only host species the chemistry varies. The herbivore’s choice is initially mainly guided by volatile plant compounds. Once on the plant, particularly for aphids the phloem quality affects their performance. However, little is known about the intraspecific and intra-individual variation in phloem sap and their influences on monophagous aphids. To determine potential mechanisms involved in aphid colonization, we tested the effects of intraspecific chemical variation in Tanacetum vulgare, which produces different chemotypes, on the preference of two monophagous aphid species. Moreover, we measured the performance of the aphids on different plant parts (stem close to the inflorescence, young and old leaves) of these chemotypes and analyzed their phloem sap composition. Both species preferred the β-thujone (THU) over the trans-carvyl acetate (CAR) chemotype in dual-choice assays. Survival of Macrosiphoniella tanacetaria was neither affected by intraspecific nor intra-individual variation, whereas the reproduction was highest on stems. In contrast, Uroleucon tanaceti survived and reproduced best on old leaves of the preferred chemotype. The sugar, organic acid and amino acid composition pronouncedly differed between phloem exudates of different plant parts, but less between chemotypes. Unexpectedly, high concentrations of amino acids did not necessarily enhance aphid performance. These different performance optima may cause niche differentiation and, therefore, enable co-existence. In conclusion, the tremendous variation in plant chemistry even within one species can affect the distribution of highly specialized aphids at various scales aphid species-specifically.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Abisgold JD, Simpson SJ, Douglas AE (1994) Nutrient regulation in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum—application of a novel geometric framework to sugar and amino acid consumption. Phys Entomol 19:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1994.tb01081.x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Addicott JF (1978) Niche relationships among species of aphids feeding on fireweed. Can J Zool 56:1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1139/z78-250
Article Google Scholar
Aldamen H, Gerowitt B (2009) Influence of selected potato cultivars on the reproduction rate of the aphid species Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas). J Plant Dis Protect 116:278–282
Article Google Scholar
Auclair JL (1967) Effects of light and sugars on rearing the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, on a germ-free and holidic diet. J Insect Phys 13:1247–1268
CAS Article Google Scholar
Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145300
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bálint J et al (2016) Intraspecific differences in plant chemotype determine the structure of arthropod food webs. Oecologia 180:797–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3508-y
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bernays EA, Klein BA (2002) Quantifying the symbiont contribution to essential amino acids in aphids: the importance of tryptophan for Uroleucon ambrosiae. Phys Entomol 27:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00297.x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Bolnick DI et al (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bowers MD, Stamp NE (1992) Chemical variation within and between individuals of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). J Chem Ecol 18:985–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00980057
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bromley AK, Anderson M (1982) An electro-physiological study of olfaction in the aphid Nasonovia ribis-nigri. Entomol Exp Appl 32:101–110
Article Google Scholar
Chapman RF, Bernays EA, Simpson SJ (1981) Attraction and repulsion of the aphid, Cavariella aegopodii, by plant odors. J Chem Ecol 7:881–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992385
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Clancy MV, Zytynska SE, Senft M, Weisser WW, Schnitzler JP (2016) Chemotypic variation in terpenes emitted from storage pools influences early aphid colonisation on tansy. Sci Rep 6:38087. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38087
CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cole RA (1984) Phenolic acids associated with the resistance of lettuce cultivars to the lettuce root aphid. Ann Appl Biol 105:129–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1984.tb02809.x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Cole RA (1997) The relative importance of glucosinolates and amino acids to the development of two aphid pests Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae on wild and cultivated brassica species. Entomol Exp Appl 85:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00242.x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Dadd RH, Krieger DL (1968) Dietary amino acid requirements of the aphid, Myzus persicae. J Insect Physiol 14:741–764
CAS Article Google Scholar
Douglas AE (2006) Phloem-sap feeding by animals: problems and solutions. J Exp Bot 57:747–754. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj067
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Febvay G, Rahbe Y, Rynkiewicz M, Guillaud J, Bonnot G (1999) Fate of dietary sucrose and neosynthesis of amino acids in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, reared on different diets. J Exp Biol 202:2639–2652
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Girousse C, Moulia B, Silk W, Bonnemain JL (2005) Aphid infestation causes different changes in carbon and nitrogen allocation in alfalfa stems as well as different inhibitions of longitudinal and radial expansion. Plant Phys 137:1474–1484. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.057430
CAS Article Google Scholar
Givovich A, Sandström J, Niemeyer HM, Pettersson J (1994) Presence of a hydroxamic acid glucoside in wheat phloem sap, and its consequences for performance of Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Chem Ecol 20:1923–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02066233
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Goodey NA, Florance HV, Smirnoff N, Hodgson DJ (2015) Aphids pick their poison: selective sequestration of plant chemicals affects host plant use in a specialist herbivore. J Chem Ecol 41:956–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-015-0634-2
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gould GG, Jones CG, Rifleman P, Perez A, Coleman JS (2007) Variation in eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) phloem sap content caused by leaf development may affect feeding site selection behavior of the aphid, Chaitophorous populicola Thomas (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 36:1212–1225. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x(2007)36[1212:viecpd]2.0.co;2
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13:383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01433.x
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gündüz EA, Douglas AE (2009) Symbiotic bacteria enable insect to use a nutritionally inadequate diet. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 276:987–991. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1476
Article Google Scholar
Guo H et al (2013) Pea aphid promotes amino acid metabolism both in Medicago truncatula and bacteriocytes to favor aphid population growth under elevated CO₂. Global Change Biol 19:3210–3223. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12260
Article Google Scholar
Hahn PG, Maron JL (2016) A framework for predicting intraspecific variation in plant defense. Trends Ecol Evol 31:646–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.007
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Holopainen M, Hiltunen R, von Schantz M (1987) A study on tansy chemotypes. Planta Med 53:284–287. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-962707
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hummel J, Strehmel N, Selbig J, Walther D, Kopka J (2010) Decision tree supported substructure prediction of metabolites from GC–MS profiles. Metabolomics 6:322–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-010-0198-7
CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jackson DL, Dixon AFG (1996) Factors determining the distribution of the green spruce aphid, Elatobium abietinum, on young and mature needles of spruce. Ecol Entomol 21:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1996.t01-1-00026.x
Article Google Scholar
Kabouw P et al (2011) Effects of soil organisms on aboveground multitrophic interactions are consistent between plant genotypes mediating the interaction. Entomol Exp Appl 139:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01123.x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Kallarackal J, Bauer SN, Nowak H, Hajirezaei MR, Komor E (2012) Diurnal changes in assimilate concentrations and fluxes in the phloem of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) and tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.). Planta 236:209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1600-7
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Karley AJ, Douglas AE, Parker WE (2002) Amino acid composition and nutritional quality of potato leaf phloem sap for aphids. J Exp Biol 205:3009–3018
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kennedy JS (1958) Physiological condition of the host-plant and susceptibility to aphid attack. Entomol Exp Appl 1:50–65
Article Google Scholar
Klausnitzer B (2008) Insekten an Rainfarn (Tanacetum vulgare L.) als Beispiel für die Bedeutung von Wildkräutern in der Agrarlandschaft für die Entomofauna. Berichte der naturforschenden Gesellschaft der Oberlausitz 16:99–108
Google Scholar
Kleine S, Müller C (2011) Intraspecific plant chemical diversity and its relation to herbivory. Oecologia 166:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1827-6
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kleine S, Müller C (2013) Differences in shoot and root terpenoid profiles and plant responses to fertilisation in Tanacetum vulgare. Phytochemistry 96:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.09.018
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kleine S, Müller C (2014) Drought stress and leaf herbivory affect root terpenoid concentrations and growth of Tanacetum vulgare. J Chem Ecol 40:1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0505-2
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kopka J et al (2005) GMD@ CSB. DB: the Golm metabolome database. Bioinformatics 21:1635–1638
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kos M et al (2012) Herbivore-mediated effects of glucosinolates on different natural enemies of a specialist aphid. J Chem Ecol 38:100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0065-2
CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kováts E (1958) Gaschromatographische Charakterisierung organischer Verbindungen. 1. Retentionsindices aliphatischer Halogenide, Alkohole, Aldehyde und Ketone. Helvet Chim Acta 41:1915–1932
Article Google Scholar
Leather SR, Dixon AFG (1981) The effect of cereal growth stage and feeding site on the reproductive activity of the bird-cherry aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi. Ann Appl Biol 97:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1981.tb03006.x
Article Google Scholar
Linhart YB, Keefover-Ring K, Mooney KA, Breland B, Thompson JD (2005) A chemical polymorphism in a multitrophic setting: thyme monoterpene composition and food web structure. Am Nat 166:517–529. https://doi.org/10.1086/444438
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Lokki J, Sorsa M, Forsen K, Schantz MV (1973) Genetics of monoterpenes in Chrysanthenum vulgare. 1. Genetic-control and inhertitance of some of most common chemotypes. Hereditas 74:225–232
CAS Article Google Scholar
MacGillivray ME, Anderson GB (1957) Three useful insect cages. Can Entomol 89:43–46
Article Google Scholar
McCall AC, Fordyce JA (2010) Can optimal defence theory be used to predict the distribution of plant chemical defences? J Ecol 98:985–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01693.x
Article Google Scholar
Mewis I, Khan MAM, Glawischnig E, Schreiner M, Ulrichs C (2012) Water stress and aphid feeding differentially influence metabolite composition in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.). PLoS One 7:e48661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048661
CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mittler TE (1958) Studies on the feeding and nutrition of Tuberolachnus salignus (Gmelin) (Homoptera, Aphididae). 2. The nitrogen and sugar composition of ingested phloem sap and excreted honeydew. J Exp Biol 35:74–84
CAS Google Scholar
Mittler TE (1967) Effect of amino acid and sugar concentrations on the food uptake of the aphid Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 10:39–51
CAS Article Google Scholar
Mittler TE, Tsitsipis JA, Kleinjan JE (1970) Utilization of dehydroascorbic acid and some related compounds by the aphid Myzus persicae feeding on an improved diet. J Insect Phys 16:2315–2326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(70)90154-x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Molyneux RJ, Campbell BC, Dreyer DL (1990) Honeydew analysis for detecting phloem transport of plant natural products—implications for host-plant resistance to sap-sucking insects. J Chem Ecol 16:1899–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01020503
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Müller C, Arand K (2007) Trade-offs in oviposition choice? Food-dependent performance and defence against predators of a herbivorous sawfly. Entomol Exp Appl 124:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00558.x
Article Google Scholar
Nowak H, Komor E (2010) How aphids decide what is good for them: experiments to test aphid feeding behaviour on Tanacetum vulgare (L.) using different nitrogen regimes. Oecologia 163:973–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1652-y
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Nyaanga JG, Kamau AW, Wanjama JK (2006) Niche and temporal differences in colonization of wheat varieties by three species of cereal aphids. Asian J Plant Sci 5:713–716
Article Google Scholar
Peel AJ, Weatherley PE (1959) Composition of sieve-tube sap. Nature 184:1955–1956. https://doi.org/10.1038/1841955a0
CAS Article Google Scholar
Powell G, Tosh CR, Hardie J (2006) Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Annu Rev Entomol 51:309–330
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rank NE, Köpf A, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Tahvanainen J (1998) Host preference and larval performance of the salicylate-using leaf beetle Phratora vitellinae. Ecology 79:618–631. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0618:hpalpo]2.0.co;2
R Developmental Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
Sandström J, Pettersson J (1994) Amino acid composition of phloem sap and the relation to intraspecific variation in pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) performance. J Insect Phys 40:947–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(94)90133-3
Article Google Scholar
Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JAA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Google Scholar
Schweiger R, Heise AM, Persicke M, Müller C (2014) Interactions between the jasmonic and salicylic acid pathway modulate the plant metabolome and affect herbivores of different feeding types. Plant Cell Environ 37:1574–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12257
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Simpson SJ, Abisgold JD, Douglas AE (1995) Response of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) to variation in dietary levels of sugar and amino acids: the significance of amino acid quality. J Insect Phys 41:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(94)00073-p
CAS Article Google Scholar
Srivastava PN, Gao Y, Levesque J, Auclair JL (1985) Differences in amino acid requirements between two biotypes of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Can J Zool 63:603–606
CAS Article Google Scholar
Stolpe C, Giehren F, Krämer U, Müller C (2017) Both heavy metal-amendment of soil and aphid-infestation increase Cd and Zn concentrations in phloem exudates of a metal-hyperaccumulating plant. Phytochemistry 139:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.04.010
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Travers-Martin N, Müller C (2008) Matching plant defense syndromes with performance and preference of a specialist herbivore. Funct Ecol 22:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01487.x
Article Google Scholar
Trumble JT (1982) Within-plant distribution and sampling of aphids (Homoptera, Aphididae) on broccoli in Southern California. J Econ Entomol 75:587–592
Article Google Scholar
Visser JH, Yan FS (1995) Electroantennogram responses of the grain aphids Sitobion avenae (F.) and Metopolophium dirhodum (Walk.)(Hom., Aphididae) to plant odour components. J Appl Entomol 119:539–542
Article Google Scholar
Webb KL, Burley JWA (1962) Sorbitol translocation in apple. Science 137:766
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wilkinson TL, Douglas AE (2003) Phloem amino acids and the host plant range of the polyphagous aphid, Aphis fabae. Entomol Exp Appl 106:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00014.x
CAS Article Google Scholar
Williams RS, Avakian MA (2015) Colonization of Solidago altissima by the specialist aphid Uroleucon nigrotuberculatum: effects of genetic identity and leaf chemistry. J Chem Ecol 41:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-015-0546-1
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wink M, Hartmann T, Witte L, Rheinheimer J (1982) Interrelationship between quinolizidine alkaloid producing legumes and infesting insects: exploitation of the alkaloid-containing phloem sap of Cytisus scoparius by the broom aphid Aphis cytisorum. Z Naturforsch C 37:1081–1086
Google Scholar
Wolf VC, Berger U, Gassmann A, Müller C (2011) High chemical diversity of a plant species is accompanied by increased chemical defence in invasive populations. Biol Invasions 13:2091–2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0028-5
Article Google Scholar
Wolf VC, Gassmann A, Müller C (2012) Choice behaviour and performance of Cassida stigmatica on various chemotypes of Tanacetum vulgare and implications for biocontrol. Entomol Exp Appl 144:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01242.x
Article Google Scholar
Yoshihara T, Sogawa K, Pathak MD, Juliano BO, Sakamura S (1980) Oxalic acid as a sucking inhibitor of the brown planthopper in rice (Delphacidae, Homoptera). Entomol Exp Appl 27:149–155
CAS Article Google Scholar
Zytynska SE, Preziosi RF (2011) Genetic interactions influence host preference and performance in a plant-insect system. Evol Ecol 25:1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9493-7
Article Google Scholar
Zytynska SE, Weisser WW (2016) The effect of plant within-species variation on aphid ecology. In: Vilcinskas A (ed) Biology and ecology of aphids. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 152–170

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sandra Kleine for supplying the Tanacetum vulgare seeds as well as Jennifer Lesley Till and Franziska Welland for their help in performing the aphid preference and performance experiments.

Author information

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
Ruth Jakobs & Caroline Müller

Authors

Ruth Jakobs
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Caroline Müller
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The conception and design of the study was performed by RJ and CM. RJ carried out the experiments and chemical analyses and performed the statistical analyses. RJ and CM evaluated the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Müller.

Additional information

Communicated by Colin Mark Orians.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakobs, R., Müller, C. Effects of intraspecific and intra-individual differences in plant quality on preference and performance of monophagous aphid species. Oecologia 186, 173–184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3998-x

Download citation

Received: 23 October 2017
Accepted: 03 November 2017
Published: 15 November 2017
Issue Date: January 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3998-x

Keywords

Aphid abundance
Chemotype
Phloem chemistry
Tanacetum vulgare