Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 185, Issue 2, pp 181–190 | Cite as

Multitrophic interactions mediate the effects of climate change on herbivore abundance

  • Ayla Robinson
  • David W. Inouye
  • Jane E. Ogilvie
  • Emily H. Mooney
Highlighted Student Research

Abstract

Climate change can influence the abundance of insect herbivores through direct and indirect mechanisms. In this study, we evaluated multitrophic drivers of herbivore abundance for an aphid species (Aphis helianthi) in a subalpine food web consisting of a host plant (Ligusticum porteri), mutualist ants and predatory lygus bugs (Lygus spp.). We used a model-selection approach to determine which climate and host plant cues best predict year-to-year variation in insect phenology and abundance observed over 6 years. We complemented this observational study with experiments that determined how elevated temperature interacts with (1) host plant phenology and (2) the ant-aphid mutualism to determine aphid abundance. We found date of snowmelt to be the best predictor of yearly abundance of aphid and lygus bug abundance but the direction of this effect differed. Aphids achieved lower abundances in early snowmelt years likely due to increased abundance of lygus bug predators in these years. Elevating temperature of L. porteri flowering stalks reduced their quality as hosts for aphid populations. However, warming aphid colonies on host plants of similar quality increased population growth rates. Importantly, this effect was apparent even in the absence of ants. While we observed fewer ants tending colonies at elevated temperatures, these colonies also had reduced numbers of lygus bug predators. This suggests that mutualism with ants becomes less significant as temperature increases, which contrasts other ant-hemipteran systems. Our observational and experimental results show the importance of multitrophic species interactions for predicting the effect of climate change on the abundances of herbivores.

Keywords

Herbivory Ant-aphid mutualism Phenology Warming experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A Research and Creative Work grant to EM through the University of Colorado Colorado Springs supported this research. The National Science Foundation grants DEB-9408382, IBN-9814509, DEB-0238331, DEB-0922080, and DEB-1354104 provided funding to DI for the plant phenology and abundance observations. We also thank the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory for hosting and permitting this research. Fieldwork included help from Gretchen Kraeger, Cheryl Sandrow and Brittany Smith.

Author contribution statement

EM, DI and JO designed and performed the observational study. AR and EM conceived and designed the manipulative experiments. EM and AR performed the manipulative experiments. AR and EM analyzed the data. AR wrote the original version of the manuscript, and EM and DI revised and edited the final submitted version.

References

  1. Addicott JF (1978) Niche relationships among species of aphids feeding on fireweed. Can J Zool 56:1837–1841. doi: 10.1139/z78-250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addicott JF (1979) A multispecies aphid–ant association: density dependence and species-specific effects. Can J Zool 57:558–569. doi: 10.1139/z79-066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Addicott J (1981) Synonymy of Aphis heraclella Davis 1919 with Aphis helianthi Monell 1879 (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can Entomol 113:167–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agusti N, Cohen A (2000) Lygus hesperus and L. lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae), phytophages, zoophages, or omnivores: evidence of feeding adaptations suggested by the salivary and midgut digestive enzymes. J Entomol Sci 35:176–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allan BJM, Domenici P, Munday PL et al (2015) Feeling the heat: the effect of acute temperature changes on predator–prey interactions in coral reef fish. Conserv Physiol 3:cov011. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Avila-Jiménez ML, Coulson SJ (2011) Can snow depth be used to predict the distribution of the high Arctic aphid Acyrthosiphon svalbardicum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Spitsbergen? BMC Ecol 11:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-11-25 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID et al (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob Chang Biol 8:1–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton BT, Ives AR (2014a) Species interactions and a chain of indirect effects driven by reduced precipitation. Ecology 95:486–494. doi: 10.1890/13-0044.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton BT, Ives AR (2014b) Direct and indirect effects of warming on aphids, their predators, and ant mutualists. Ecology 95:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell JR, Alderson L, Izera D et al (2015) Long-term phenological trends, species accumulation rates, aphid traits and climate: five decades of change in migrating aphids. J Anim Ecol 84:21–34. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boggs CL, Inouye DW (2012) A single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics. Ecol Lett 15:502–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01766.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Both C, van Asch M, Bijlsma RG et al (2009) Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? J Anim Ecol 78:73–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01458.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Doiron M, Gauthier G, Lévesque E (2015) Trophic mismatch and its effects on the growth of young in an Arctic herbivore. Glob Chang Biol 21:4364–4376. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dollery R, Hodkinson ID, Jónsdóttir IS (2006) Impact of warming and timing of snow melt on soil microarthropod assemblages associated with Dryas-dominated plant communities on Svalbard. Ecography (Cop) 29:111–119. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04366.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Döring TF (2014) How aphids find their host plants, and how they don’t. Ann Appl Biol 165:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durant JM, Hjermann DØ, Ottersen G, Stenseth NC (2007) Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. Clim Res 33:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlén J, Morris WF (2015) Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change. Ecol Lett. doi: 10.1111/ele.12410 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Forrest JR (2016) Complex responses of insect phenology to climate change. Curr Opin Insect Sci 17:49–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuchs B, Breuer T, Findling S et al (2016) Enhanced aphid abundance in spring desynchronizes predator-prey and plant-microorganism interactions. Oecologia 183:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3768-1 Google Scholar
  20. Gillespie MAK, Jónsdóttir IS, Hodkinson ID, Cooper EJ (2013) Aphid-willow interactions in a high Arctic ecosystem: responses to raised temperature and goose disturbance. Glob Chang Biol 19:3698–3708. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12284 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagler JR, Jackson CG, Blackmer JL (2010) Diet selection exhibited by juvenile and adult lifestages of the omnivores Western tarnished plant bug, Lygus hesperus and tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris. J Insect Sci 10:127. doi: 10.1673/031.010.12701 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hairston N, Smith F, Slobodkin L (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94:421–425. doi: 10.1086/282146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harmon JP, Moran NA, Ives AR (2009) Species response to environmental change: impacts of food web interactions and evolution. Science 323:1347–1350. doi: 10.1126/science.1167396 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrington R, Clark SJ, Welham SJ et al (2007) Environmental change and the phenology of European aphids. Glob Chang Biol 13:1550–1564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01394.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iler A, Inouye D, Hoye TT et al (2013) Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate. Glob Chang Biol 19:2348–2359. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12246 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Inouye D (2008) Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 89:353–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackman S (2017) pscl: classes and methods for R developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory. United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. R package version 1.5.1. https://github.com/atahk/pscl/
  28. Jamieson MA, Trowbridge AM, Raffa KF, Lindroth RL (2012) Consequences of climate warming and altered precipitation patterns for plant-insect and multitrophic interactions. Plant Physiol 160:1719–1727. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.206524 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Jamieson MA, Schwartzberg EG, Raffa KF et al (2015) Experimental climate warming alters aspen and birch phytochemistry and performance traits for an outbreak insect herbivore. Glob Chang Biol 21:2698–2710. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jandricic SE, Mattson NS, Wraight SP, Sanderson JP (2014) Within-Plant Distribution of Aulacorthum solani (Hemiptera: Aphididae), on Various Greenhouse Plants With Implications for Control. J Econ Entomol 107:697–707. doi: 10.1603/EC13428 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Khattat AR, Stewart RK (1980) Population fluctuations and interplant movements of Lygus lineolaris. Ann Entomol Soc Am 73:282–287. doi: 10.1093/aesa/73.3.282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kummel M, Brown D, Bruder A (2013) How the aphids got their spots: predation drives self-organization of aphid colonies in a patchy habitat. Oikos 122:896–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20805.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leferink JHM, Gerber GH (1997) Development of adult and nymphal populations of Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois), L. elisus Van Duzee, and L. borealis (Kelton) (Heteroptera: Miridae) in relation to seeding date and stage of plant development on canola (Brassi.). Can Entomol 129:777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindsey AH (1982) Floral phenology patterns and breeding systems in Thaspium and Zizia (Apiaceae). Syst Bot 7:1–12. doi: 10.2307/2418648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu Y, Wu K, Jiang Y et al (2010) Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops. Science (80-) 328:1151–1154. doi: 10.1126/science.1187881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marquis M, Del Toro I, Pelini SL (2014) Insect mutualisms buffer warming effects on multiple trophic levels. Ecology 95:9–13. doi: 10.1890/13-0760.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazerolle MJ (2017) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.1-1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg. Accessed 5 Sept 2017
  38. Miller-Rushing AJ, Høye TT, Inouye DW, Post E (2010) The effects of phenological mismatches on demography. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:3177–3186. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mooney EH, Phillips JS, Tillberg CV et al (2016) Abiotic mediation of a mutualism drives herbivore abundance. Ecol Lett 19:37–44. doi: 10.1111/ele.12540 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mortensen LO, Schmidt NM, Høye TT et al (2015) Analysis of trophic interactions reveals highly plastic response to climate change in a tri-trophic High-Arctic ecosystem. Polar Biol 39:1–12Google Scholar
  41. Müller CB, Godfray HCJ (1999) Predators and mutualists influence the exclusion of aphid species from natural communities. Oecologia 119:120–125. doi: 10.1007/s004420050767 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ness J, Mooney K, Lach L (2007) Ants as mutualists. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 432Google Scholar
  43. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2016) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 5 Sept 2017
  44. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
  45. Rosenblatt AE, Schmitz OJ (2016) Climate change, nutrition, and bottom-up and top-down food web processes. Trends Ecol Evol 31:965–975. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sagata K, Gibb H (2016) The effect of temperature increases on an ant-hemiptera-plant interaction. PLoS One 11:e0155131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155131 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Salopek-Sondi B, Kovač M, Prebeg T, Magnus V (2002) Developing fruit direct post-floral morphogenesis in Helleborus niger L. J Exp Bot 53:1949–1957. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf047 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartzberg EG, Jamieson MA, Raffa KF et al (2014) Simulated climate warming alters phenological synchrony between an outbreak insect herbivore and host trees. Oecologia 175:1041–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2960-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Terrell IB, Fennell A (2008) Osha: bear Root. Nativ Plants J 10:111–118Google Scholar
  51. Van De Velde H, Nijs I, Bonte D (2016) Warming affects different components of plant-herbivore interaction in a simplified community but not net interaction strength. Oikos 126:285–295. doi: 10.1111/oik.03415 Google Scholar
  52. Van der Putten WH, Macel M, Visser ME (2010) Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2025–2034. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0037 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD et al (2013) The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:15–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhou A, Qu X, Shan L, Wang X (2017) Temperature warming strengthens the mutualism between ghost ants and invasive mealybugs. Sci Rep 7:959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01137-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayla Robinson
    • 1
    • 2
  • David W. Inouye
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jane E. Ogilvie
    • 2
    • 4
  • Emily H. Mooney
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Rocky Mountain Biological LaboratoryCrested ButteUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of Colorado Colorado SpringsColorado SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations