Plant–microbial competition for nitrogen increases microbial activities and carbon loss in invaded soils
Many invasive plant species show high rates of nutrient acquisition relative to their competitors. Yet the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, and its implications for ecosystem functioning, are poorly understood, particularly in nutrient-limited systems. Here, we test the hypothesis that an invasive plant species (Microstegium vimineum) enhances its rate of nitrogen (N) acquisition by outcompeting soil organic matter-degrading microbes for N, which in turn accelerates soil N and carbon (C) cycling. We estimated plant cover as an indicator of plant N acquisition rate and quantified plant tissue N, soil C and N content and transformations, and extracellular enzyme activities in invaded and uninvaded plots. Under low ambient N availability, invaded plots had 77% higher plant cover and lower tissue C:N ratios, suggesting that invasion increased rates of plant N acquisition. Concurrent with this pattern, we observed significantly higher mass-specific enzyme activities in invaded plots as well as 71% higher long-term N availability, 21% lower short-term N availability, and 16% lower particulate organic matter N. A structural equation model showed that these changes were interrelated and associated with 27% lower particulate organic matter C in invaded areas. Our findings suggest that acquisition of N by this plant species enhances microbial N demand, leading to an increased flux of N from organic to inorganic forms and a loss of soil C. We conclude that high N acquisition rates by invasive plants can drive changes in soil N cycling that are linked to effects on soil C.
KeywordsInvasive plants Nutrient uptake Soil carbon Enzyme activities Nitrogen limitation
This project was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation to the Coweeta Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) program (DEB-0,823,293), and by an Odell Soil Science Fellowship, Garden Club of Downer’s grove scholarship, and Spaeth-Boggess scholarship for M. Craig. We acknowledge S. Pearson for his expertise and guidance during field work. We thank M. Hamilton, E. McGrath, C. Grabowski, and J. Horton for their contributions to this work, and two anonymous reviewers and the Editor, Pascal Niklaus, for their helpful feedback on the manuscript. Finally, we thank the many landowners and agencies who allowed access to field sites.
Author contribution statement
MEC and JMF conceived and designed the study. MEC carried out the study and analyzed the data. MEC and JMF wrote the manuscript.
- Craine JM (2011) Resource strategies of wild plants. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM, Fahey TJ, Fernandez CW, Guo D, Helmisaari H, Hobbie EA, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Leppalammi-Kujansuu J, Norby RJ, Phillips RP, Pregitzer KS, Pritchard SG, Rewald B, Zadworny M (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207:505–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Ha I, Fuchslueger L, Hofhansl F, Takriti M, Watzka M, Wild B, Keiblinger KM, Knoltsch A, Zechmeister-boltenstern S, Richter A (2014) Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon:nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling. Nat Commun 5:4694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roy J (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In: Di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (eds) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 333–352Google Scholar
- Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar