, Volume 184, Issue 1, pp 161–170 | Cite as

Aridity promotes bet hedging via delayed hatching: a case study with two temporary pond crustaceans along a latitudinal gradient

  • Tom PinceelEmail author
  • Bram Vanschoenwinkel
  • Wouter Hawinkel
  • Karen Tuytens
  • Luc Brendonck
Population ecology – original research


Climate change does affect not only average rainfall and temperature but also their variation, which can reduce the predictability of suitable conditions for growth and reproduction. This situation is problematic for inhabitants of temporary waters whose reproductive success depends on rainfall and evaporation that determine the length of the aquatic phase. For organisms with long-lived dormant life stages, bet hedging models suggest that a fraction of these should stay dormant during each growing season to buffer against the probability of total reproductive failure in variable environments. Thus far, however, little empirical evidence supports this prediction in aquatic organisms. We study geographic variation in delayed hatching of dormant eggs in natural populations of two crustaceans, Branchinella longirostris and Paralimnadia badia, that occur in temporary rock pools along a 725 km latitudinal aridity gradient in Western Australia. Consistent with bet hedging theory, populations of both species were characterised by delayed hatching under common garden conditions and hatching fractions decreased towards the drier end of the gradient where the probability of reproductive success was shown to be lower. This decrease was most pronounced in the species with the longer maturation time, presumably because it is more sensitive to the higher prevalence of short inundations. Overall, these findings illustrate that regional variation in climate can be reflected in differential investment in bet hedging and hints at a higher importance of delayed hatching to persist when the climate becomes harsher. Such strategies could become exceedingly relevant as determinants of vulnerability under climate change.


Diapause Risk spreading Climate change Life history Australia 



Tom Pinceel is currently funded by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, 12F0716N). This research received additional funding from the Research Foundation Flanders (3E090007 and 3E110799) and the Excellence Center ‘Eco and socio-evolutionary dynamics’ (PF/10/007) of the KU Leuven Research Fund. The authors thank Dr. Falko Buschke and Dr. Joost Vanoverbeke for their advice with regard to the data analyses, Prof. Luc De Meester for his valuable feedback on an early version of the manuscript and Prof. Brian Timms for his guidance and advice during the sampling campaign. We thank the Department of Environment and Conservation of Western Australia for issuing permits.

Author contribution statement

TP, BV and LB conceived and designed the experiments. TP, BV and LB performed the sampling. WH and TP performed the experiments. KT performed the hydrological modelling. TP, KT and WH analysed the data. All authors wrote the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2017_3858_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (611 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 611 kb)


  1. Ali AJ, Dumont HJ (1995) Larviculture of the fairy shrimp, streptocephalus-proboscideus (crustacea, anostraca)—effect of food concentration and physical-properties and chemical-properties of the culture-medium. Hydrobiologia 298:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altermatt F, Pajunen VI, Ebert D (2008) Climate change affects colonization dynamics in a metacommunity of three Daphnia species. Glob Change Biol 14:1209–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1985) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents to freshwater and marine organisms. US Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA/600/604-685/013Google Scholar
  4. Benvenuto C, Calabrese A, Reed SK, Knott B (2009) Multiple hatching events in clam shrimp: implications for mate guarding behaviour and community ecology. Curr Sci 96:130–136Google Scholar
  5. Boven L, Stoks R, Forro L, Brendonck L (2008) Seasonal dynamics in water quality and vegetation cover in temporary pools with variable hydroperiods in Kiskunság (Hungary). Wetlands 28:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brendonck L (1996) Diapause, quiescence, hatching requirements: what we can learn from large freshwater branchiopods (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Anostraca, Notostraca, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 320:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brendonck L, Riddoch BJ (1999) Wind-borne short-range egg dispersal in anostracans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Biol J Linn Soc 67:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brendonck L, Riddoch B (2001) Hatching characteristics of the fairy shrimp Branchipodopsis wolfi in relation to the stochastic nature of its habitats, desert rock pools. Verhandelungen des internationalen Verein Limnologie 27:3931–3935Google Scholar
  9. Brendonck L, Jocqué M, Tuytens K, Timms BV, Vanschoenwinkel B (2015) Hydrological stability drives both local and regional diversity patterns in rock pool metacommunities. Oikos 000:001–009Google Scholar
  10. Childs DZ, Metcalf C, Rees M (2010) Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:3055–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:000–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen D, Levin S (1987) The Interaction between Dispersal and Dormancy Strategies in Varying and Heterogeneous Environments. In: Teramoto E, Yumaguti M (eds) Mathematical topics in population biology, morphogenesis and neurosciences, vol 71. Springer, Berlin, pp 110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans MEK, Dennehy JJ (2005) Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. Q Rev Biol 80:431–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukami T, Wardle DA (2005) Long-term ecological dynamics: reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2105–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Roger EM, Serra M, Carmona MJ (2014) Bet-hedging in diapausing egg hatching of temporary rotifer populations–A review of models and new insights. Int Rev Hydrobiol 99:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Roger EM, Carmona MJ, Serra M (2016) Modes, mechanisms and evidence of bet hedging in rotifer diapause traits. Hydrobiologia. pp 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2869-5
  17. Gremer JR, Venable DL (2014) Bet hedging in desert winter annual plants: optimal germination strategies in a variable environment. Ecol Lett 17:380–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hulsmans A, Vanschoenwinkel B, Pyke C, Riddoch BJ, Brendonck L (2008) Quantifying the hydroregime of a temporary pool habitat: a modelling approach for ephemeral rock pools in SE Botswana. Ecosystems 11:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups i, ii and iii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Switzerland, IPCC, p 151Google Scholar
  21. Jocqué Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L (2010) Freshwater rock pools: a review of habitat characteristics, faunal diversity and conservation value. Freshw Biol 55:1587–1602Google Scholar
  22. Jocqué M, Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L (2010) Anostracan monopolisation of early successional phases in temporary waters? Fundam Appl Limnol 176:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lukic D, Vad CF, Horváth Z (2016) Isolation by sugar flotation has no direct effect on the hatching success of zooplankton resting eggs. J Limnol 75:415–421Google Scholar
  24. Moss B (2012) Cogs in the endless machine: lakes, climate change and nutrient cycles: a review. Sci Total Environ 434:130–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen DL, Jasper EW, Ning N, Lawler S (2015) High sediment temperatures influence the emergence of dormant aquatic biota. Mar Freshw Res 66:1138–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Onbé T (1978) Sugar flotation method for the sorting the resting eggs of marine cladocerans and copepods from seabottom sediment. B Jpn Soc Sci Fish 44:1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pacifici M et al (2015) Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat Clim Change 5:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Philippi T, Seger J (1989) Hedging ones evolutionary bets. Revi Trends Ecol Evol 4:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Philippi TE, Simovich MA, Bauder ET, Moorad JA (2001) Habitat ephemerality and hatching fractions of a diapausing anostracan (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Israel J Zool 47:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. JHU Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinceel T, Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L (2013a) Flexible dispersal dimorphism in zooplankton resting eggs: an example of repeated phenotypic coin flipping? Biol J Linn Soc 110:749–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinceel T, Brendonck L, Larmuseau MHD, Vanhove MPM, Timms BV, Vanschoenwinkel B (2013b) Environmental change as a driver of diversification in temporary aquatic habitats: does the genetic structure of extant fairy shrimp populations reflect historic aridification? Freshw Biol 58:1556–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinceel T, Vanschoenwinkel B, Deckers P, Grégoir A, Ver Eecke T, Brendonck L (2015) Early and late developmental arrest as complementary embryonic risk spreading strategies in African killifish. Biol J Linn Soc 114:941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinceel T, Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L, Buschke F (2016) Modelling the sensitivity of life history traits to climate change in a temporary pool crustacean. Sci Rep 6:29451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Pyke C (2005) Assessing climate change impacts on vernal pool ecosystems and endemic branchiopods. Ecoystems 8:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surv. Evol Biol 4:182–211Google Scholar
  37. Simons AM (2011) Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging. Proc R Soc Londo B Biol Sci 278:1601–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simons A (2014) Playing smart vs. playing safe: the joint expression of phenotypic plasticity and potential bet hedging across and within thermal environments. J Evol Biol 27:1047–1056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Simovich MA, Hathaway SA (1997) Diversified bet-hedging as a reproductive strategy of some ephemeral pool anostracans (Branchiopoda). J Crustac Biol 17:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slatkin M (1974) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets. Nature 250:704–705Google Scholar
  41. Starrfelt J, Kokko H (2012) Bet-hedging, a triple trade-off between means, variances and correlations. Biol Rev 87:742–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoks R, Geerts AN, De Meester L (2014) Evolutionary and plastic responses of freshwater invertebrates to climate change: realized patterns and future potential. Evol Appl 7:42–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tielbörger K, Petruů M, Lampei C (2012) Bet-hedging germination in annual plants: a sound empirical test of the theoretical foundations. Oikos 121:1860–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Timms BV (2012) Seasonal study of aquatic invertebrates in five sets of latitudinally separated gnammas in southern Western Australia. J R Soc W Aust. 95:13–28Google Scholar
  45. Tuytens K, Vanschoenwinkel B, Waterkeyn A, Brendonck L (2014) Predictions of climate change infer increased environmental harshness and altered connectivity in a cluster of temporary pools. Freshw Biol 59:955–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Twidale CR (2007) Ancient Australian Landscapes. Rosenberg Publishing, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  47. Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348:571–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandekerkhove J, Declerck S, Brendonck L, Conde-Porcuna JM, Jeppesen E, De Meester L (2004) Hatching rate and hatching success with and without isolation of zooplankton resting stages. Hydrobiologia 526:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vanni MJ (1986) Competition in zooplankton communities: suppression of small species by Daphnia pulex1. Limnol Oceanogr 31:1039–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vanschoenwinkel B, Gielen S, Vandewaerde H, Seaman M, Brendonck L (2008) Relative importance of different dispersal vectors for small aquatic invertebrates in a rock pool metacommunity. Ecography 31:567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vanschoenwinkel B, Hulsmans A, De Roeck ER, De Vries C, Seaman M, Brendonck L (2009) Community structure in temporary freshwater pools: disentangling effects of habitat size and hydroregime. Freshw Biol 54:1487–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vanschoenwinkel B, Seaman MT, Brendonck L (2010a) Hatching phenology, life history and egg bank size of a fairy shrimp (Branchiopoda, Crustacea) in relation to the ephemerality of its habitat. Aquat Ecol. 44:771–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vanschoenwinkel B, Waterkeyn A, Jocque M, Boven L, Seaman M, Brendonck L (2010b) Species sorting in space and time-the impact of disturbance regime on community assembly in a temporary pool metacommunity. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:1267–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Venable DL (2007) Bet hedging in a guild of desert annuals. Ecology 88:1086–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Visser ME (2008) Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:649–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams DD (2006) The Biology of Temporary Waters. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Withers PC (2000) Overview of granite outcrops in Western Australia. J R Soc West Aust 83:103–108Google Scholar
  58. Zofkova M, Timms BV (2009) A conflict of morphological and genetic patterns in the Australian anostracan Branchinella longirostris. Hydrobiologia 635:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and ConservationKU LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental ManagementUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  3. 3.Community Ecology Laboratory, Section Ecology and Biodiversity, Department of BiologyVUB (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)BrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and ManagementNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations