Oecologia

, Volume 183, Issue 4, pp 1183–1195 | Cite as

Evidence that higher [CO2] increases tree growth sensitivity to temperature: a comparison of modern and paleo oaks

  • Steven L. Voelker
  • Michael C. Stambaugh
  • J. Renée Brooks
  • Frederick C. Meinzer
  • Barbara Lachenbruch
  • Richard P. Guyette
Global change ecology – original research

Abstract

To test tree growth sensitivity to temperature under different ambient CO2 concentrations, we determined stem radial growth rates as they relate to variation in temperature during the last deglacial period, and compare these to modern tree growth rates as they relate to spatial variation in temperature across the modern species distributional range. Paleo oaks were sampled from Northern Missouri, USA and compared to a pollen-based, high-resolution paleo temperature reconstruction from Northern Illinois, USA. Growth data were from 53 paleo bur oak log cross sections collected in Missouri. These oaks were preserved in river and stream sediments and were radiocarbon-dated to a period of rapid climate change during the last deglaciation (10.5 and 13.3 cal kyr BP). Growth data from modern bur oaks were obtained from increment core collections paired with USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis data collected across the Great Plains, Midwest, and Upper Great Lakes regions. For modern oaks growing at an average [CO2] of 330 ppm, growth sensitivity to temperature (i.e., the slope of growth rate versus temperature) was about twice that of paleo oaks growing at an average [CO2] of 230 ppm. These data help to confirm that leaf-level predictions that photosynthesis and thus growth will be more sensitive to temperature at higher [CO2] in mature trees—suggesting that tree growth forest productivity will be increasingly sensitive to temperature under projected global warming and high-[CO2] conditions.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide NPP GPP Photosynthesis Forest productivity 

Supplementary material

442_2017_3831_MOESM1_ESM.docx (311 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 310 kb)

References

  1. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali AA, Xu C, Rogers A, McDowell NG, Medlyn BE, Fisher RA, Wullschleger SD, Reich PB, Vrugt JA, Baurle WL, Santiago LS, Wilson CJ (2015) Global-scale environmental control of photosynthetic capacity. Ecol Appl 25:2349–2365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameye M, Wertin TM, Bauweraerts I, McGuire MA, Teskey RO, Steppe K (2012) The effect of induced heat waves on Pinus taeda and Quercus rubra seedlings in ambient and elevated CO2 atmospheres. New Phytol 196:448–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson KJ, Allen AP, Gillooly JF, Brown JH (2006) Temperature-dependence of biomass accumulation rates during secondary succession. Ecol Lett 9:673–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Miller AD, Mohan JE, Hudiberg TW, Duval BD, DeLucia EH (2013) Altered dynamics of forest recover under a changing climate. Glob Change Biol 19:2001–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreu-Hayles L, Planells O, Gutiérrez E, Muntan E, Helle G, Anchukaitis KJ, Schleser GH (2011) Long tree-ring chronologies reveal 20th century increases in water-use efficiency but no enhancement of tree growth at five Iberian pine forests. Glob Change Biol 17:2095–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bader K-F, Leuzinger S, Keel SG, Siegwolf RTW, Hegedorn F, Schleppi P, Körner C (2013) Central European hardwood trees in a high-CO2 future: synthesis of an 8-year forest canopy CO2 enrichment project. J Ecol 101:1509–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baig S, Medlyn BE, Mercado LM, Saehle S (2015) Does the growth response of woody plants to elevated CO2 increase with temperature? A model-oriented analysis. Glob Change Biol 21:4303–4319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauweraerts I, Wertin TM, Ameye M, McGuire MA, Teskey RO, Steppe K (2013) The effect of heat waves, elevated [CO2] and low soil water availability on northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings. Glob Change Biol 19:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becklin KM, Walker SM II, Way DA, Ward JK (2016) CO2 studies remain key to understanding a future world. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/nph.14336 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimental C, Portis AR Jr, Long SP (2001) Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 24:253–259Google Scholar
  12. Berry J, Björkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Phys 31:491–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brienen RJ, Gloor M, Ziv G (2016) Tree demography dominates long-term growth trends inferred from tree-rings. Glob Change Biol. doi:10.1111/gcb.13410 Google Scholar
  14. Büntgen U, Tegel W, Kaplan JO, Schaub M, Hagedorn F, Bürgi M, Brázdil R, Helle G, Carrer M, Heussner K-U, Hofmann J, Kontic R, Kyncl T, Camarero JJ, Tinner W, Esper J, Liebhold A (2014) Placing unprecedented recent fir growth in a European-wide and Holocene-long context. Front Ecol Environ 12:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA (1991) Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agr Forest Meteorol 54:107–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtis PS, Wang X (1998) A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawes MA, Philipson CD, Fonti P, Bebi P, Hättenschwiler S, Hagedorn F, Rixen C (2015) Soil warming and CO2 enrichment induce biomass shifts in alpine tree line vegetation. Glob Change Biol 21:2005–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Frenne P, Graae BJ, Rodríguez-Sánchez F, Kolb A, Chabrerie O, Decocq G, De Kort H, De Schrijver A, Diekmann M, Eriksson O, Gruwez R, Hermy M, Lenoir J, Plue J, Coomes DA, Verheyen K (2013) Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species’ responses to temperature. J Ecol 101:784–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeRose RJ, Wang S, Shaw JD (2013) Feasibility of high-density climate reconstruction based on Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) collected tree-ring data. J Hydrometorol 14:375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeRose RJ, Shaw JD, Long JN (2016) Building the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) tree-ring data set. J Forest. doi:10.5849/jof.15-097 Google Scholar
  22. Dicke St G, Bagley WT (1980) Variability of Quercus macrocarpa Michx. in an eastern Nebraska provenance study. Silvae Genet 29:171–176Google Scholar
  23. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fatichi S, Leuzinger S, Paschalis A, Langley JA, Barraclough AD, Hovenden MJ (2016) Partitioning direct and indirect effects reveals the response of water-limited ecosystems to elevated CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:12757–12762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feng X (1998) Long-term c i/c a responses of trees in western North America to atmospheric CO2 concentration derived from carbon isotope chronologies. Oecologia 117:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gartner BL (1991) Structural stability and architecture of vines vs. shrubs of poison oak, Toxicodendron diversilobum. Ecology 72:2005–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gea-Izquierdo G, Nicault A, Battipaglia G, Dorado-Linan I, Ribas M, Guiot J (2016) Risky future for Mediterranean forests unless the undergo extreme carbon fertilization. Glob Change Biol. doi:10.1111/gcb.13597 Google Scholar
  28. Gerhart LM, Harris JM, Nippert JB, Sandquist DR, Ward JK (2012) Glacial trees from the La Brea tar pits show physiological constraints of low CO2. New Phytol 194:63–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghannoum O, Phillips NG, Conroy JP, Smith RA, Attard RD, Woodfield R, Logan BA, Lewis JD, Tissue DT (2010) Exposure to preindustrial, current and future atmospheric CO2 and temperature differentially affects growth and photosynthesis in Eucalyptus. Glob Change Biol 16:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gholz H (1982) Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 63:469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gill JL, Williams JW, Jackson ST, Lininger KB, Robinson GS (2009) Pleistocene megafaunal collapse, novel plant communities, and enhanced fire regimes in North America. Science 326:1100–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gonzales LM, Williams JW, Grimm EC (2009) Expanded response surfaces: a new method to reconstruct paleoclimates from fossil pollen assemblages that lack modern analogues. Quat Sci Rev 28:3315–3332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grimley DA, Larsen D, Kaplan SW, Yansa CH, Curry BB, Oches EA (2009) A multi-proxy palaeoclimatic record within full glacial lacustrine deposits, western Tennessee, USA. J Quat Sci 24:960–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grimm EC, Jacobson GL Jr (2004) Late quaternary vegetation history of the eastern United States. In: Gillespie AR, Porter SC, Atwater BF (eds) The quaternary period in the United States. Elsevier, Boston, pp 381–402Google Scholar
  35. Guyette RP, Dey DC, Stambaugh MC (2008) The temporal distribution and carbon storage of large oak wood in streams and floodplain deposits. Ecosystems 11:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hickler T, Smith B, Prentice IC, Mjofors K, Miller P, Arneth A, Sykes MT (2008) CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests. Glob Change Biol 14:1531–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Ann Rev Plant Biol 24:519–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hungate BA, Dijkstra P, Wu Z, Duval BD, Day FP, Johnson DW, Megonigal JP, Brown ALP, Garland JL (2013) Cumulative response of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen stocks to chronic CO2 exposure in a subtropical oak woodland. New Phytol 200:753–766PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Jordan DB, Ogren WL (1984) The CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Planta 161:308–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kattge J, Knorr W (2007) Temperature acclimation in a biochemical model of photosynthesis: a reanalyses of data from 36 species. Plant Cell Environ 30:1176–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ku S-B, Edwards GE (1977) Oxygen inhibition of photosynthesis: 1. Temperature dependence and relation to O2/CO2 solubility ratio. Plant Physiol 59:986–990PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larjavaara M, Muller-Landau HC (2011) Temperature explains global variation in biomass among humid old-growth forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr 21:998–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leonardi S, Gentilesca T, Guerrieri R, Ripullone F, Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Noije TV, Borghetti M (2012) Assessing the effects of nitrogen deposition and climate on carbon isotope discrimination and intrinsic water-use efficiency of angiosperm and conifer trees under rising CO2 conditions. Glob Change Biol 18:2925–2944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lévesque M, Siegwolf R, Saurer M, Eilmann B, Rigling A (2014) Increased water-use efficiency does not lead to enhanced tree growth under xeric and mesic conditions. New Phytol 203:94–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewis JD, Lucash M, Olszyk D, Tingey DT (2001) Seasonal patterns of photosynthesis in Douglas fir seedlings during the third and fourth year of exposure to elevated CO2 and temperature. Plant, Cell Environ 24:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lieth H (1973) Primary production: terrestrial ecosystems. Hum Ecol 1:303–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lines ER, Zavala MA, Purves DW, Coomes DA (2012) Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1017–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Long SP (1991) Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated? Plant Cell Environ 14:729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003) Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitation to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J Exp Bot 54:2393–2401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luomala EM, Laitinen K, Kellomäki S, Vapaavuori E (2003) Variable photosynthetic acclimation in consecutive cohorts of Scots pine needles during 3 years of growth at elevated CO2 and elevated temperature. Plant Cell Environ 26:645–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mason JA, Miao XD, Hanson PR, Johnson WC, Jacobs PM, Goble RJ (2008) Loess record of the Late Pleistocene to Holocene transition on the central and northern Great Plains. Quat Sci Rev 27:1772–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCarthy HR, Oren R, Johnsen KH, Gallet-Budynek A, Pritchard SG, Cook CW, LaDeau SL, Jackson RB, Finzi AC (2010) Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol 185:514–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McPhee DA, Loo JA (2009) Past and present distribution of New Brunswick bur oak populations: a case for conservation. Northeast Nat 16:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Zeppel MJB (2011) Forest productivity under climate change: a checklist for evaluating model studies. WIREs Climate Change 2:332–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Monson RK, Stidham MA, Williams GJ III, Edwards GE (1982) Temperature dependence of photosynthesis in Agropyron smithii Rydb. 1. Factors affecting net CO2 uptake in intact leaves and contribution from ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase measured in vivo and in vitro. Plant Physiol 69:921–928PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muller B, Pantin F, Genard M, Turc O, Freixes S, Piques M, Gibson Y (2011) Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs. J Exp Bot 62:1715–1729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Naurzbaev MM, Hughes MK, Vaganov EA (2004) Tree-ring growth curves as sources of climatic information. Quat Res 62:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norby RJ, Luo Y (2004) Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world. New Phytol 162:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Norby RJ, Zak DR (2011) Ecological lessons from free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 42:181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nordt L, Von Fischer J, Tieszen L, Tubs J (2008) Coherent changes in relative C4 plant productivity and climate during the late Quaternary in the North American Great Plains. Quat Sci Rev 27:1600–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao S, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peñuelas J, Canadell JG, Ogaya R (2011) Increased water-use efficiency during the 20th century did not translate into enhanced tree growth. Global Ecol Biogeogr 20:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Funct Plant Biol 27:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Quentin AG, Crous KY, Barton CVM, Ellsworth DS (2015) Photosynthetic enhancement by elevated CO2 depends on season temperatures for warmed and non-warmed Eucalyptus globulus trees. Tree Physiol 35:1249–1263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Reich PB, Luo Y, Bradford JB, Poorter H, Perry CH, Oleksyn J (2014) Temperature drives global patterns in forest biomass distribution in leaves, stems, and roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13721–13726PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, Buck CE, Cheng H, Edwards RL, Griedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Haflidason H, Hajdas I, Hatté C, Heaton TJ, Hoffmann DL, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, Manning SW, Niu M, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Scott EM, Southon JR, Staff RA, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J (2013) IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years CAL BP. Radiocarbon 55:1869–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rogers A, Medlyn BE, Dukes JS, Bonan G, von Caemmerer S, Dietze MC, Kattge J, Leakey ADB, Mercado LM, Niinemets Ü, Prentice IC, Serbin SP, Sitch S, Way DA, Zaehle S (2017) A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. New Phytol 213:22–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sage RF, Sharkey TD (1987) The effect of temperatue on the occurrence of O2 and CO2 insensitive photosynthesis in field grown plants. Plant Physiol 84:658–664PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Salzer MW, Hughes MK, Bunn AG, Kipfmueller KF (2010) Recent unprecedented tree-ring growth in bristlecone pine at the highest elevations and possible causes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20348–20353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sandel B, Arge L, Dalsgaard B, Davies RG, Gaston KJ, Sutherland WJ, Svenning J-C (2011) The influence of late quaternary climate-change velocity on species endemism. Science 334:660–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saurer M, Spahni R, Frank DC, Joos F, Leuenberger M, Loader NJ, McCarroll D, Gagen M, Poulter B, Siegwolf RTW, Andreu-Hayles L, Boettger T, Liñan D, Fairchild ID, Friedrich M, Gutierrez E, Haupt M, Hilasvuori E, Heinrich I, Helle G, Grudd H, Jalkanen R, Levanič T, Linderhold HW, Iain Robertson, Sonninen E, Treydte K, Waterhouse JS, Woodley EJ, Wynnn PM, Young GHF (2014) Spatial variability and temporal trends in water-use-efficiency of European forests. Glob Change Biol 20:3700–3712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shane LCK, Anderson KH (1993) Intensity, gradients and reversals in late glacial environmental change in east-central North America. Quat Sci Rev 12:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shuman BN, Newby P, Donnelly JP (2009) Abrupt climate change as an important agent of ecological change in the northeast U.S. throughout the past 15,000 years. Quat Sci Rev 28:1693–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sieg CH, Meko DM, DeGaetano AD, Ni W (1996) Dendroclimatic potential in the northern Great Plains. In: Dean JS, Meko DM, Swetnam TW (eds) Tree rings, environment and humanity proceedings of the international radiocarbon conference, Radiocarbon, Tucson, AZ, pp 295–302Google Scholar
  76. Silva LCR, Anand M (2013) Probing for the influence of atmospheric CO2 and climate change on forest ecosystems across biomes. Global Ecol Biogeogr 22:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. St. George S, Nielsen E (2002) Hydroclimatic change in Southern Manitoba since A.D. 1409 inferred from tree rings. Quat Res 58:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stambaugh MC, Guyette RP, McMurry ER, Cook ER, Meko DM, Lupo AC (2011) Drought duration and frequency in the U.S. Corn Belt during the last millennium (AD 992–2004). Agr Forest Meteorol 151:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ (1993) Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Terrer C, Vicca S, Hungate BA, Phillips RP, Prentice IC (2016) Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect. Science 353:72–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Teskey RO (1997) Combined effects of elevated CO2 and air temperature on carbon assimilation of Pinus taeda trees. Plant Cell Environ 20:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tingey DT, Lee EH, Phillips DL, Rygiewicz PT, Waschmann RS, Johnson MG, Olszyk DM (2007) Elevated CO2 and temperature alter net ecosystem C exchange in a young Douglas fir mesocosm experiment. Plant Cell Environ 30:1400–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB (1998) Seedlings of five boreal tree species differ in acclimation of net photosynthesis to elevated CO2 and temperature. Tree Physiol 18:715–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van der Sleen P, Groenendijk P, Viam M, Anten NPR, Boom A, Bongers F, Pons TL, Terburg G, Zuidema PA (2015) No growth stimulation of tropical trees by 150 years of CO2 fertilization but water-use efficiency increased. Nat Geosci 8:24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vårhammar A, Wallin G, McLean CM, Dusenge ME, Medlyn BE, Hasper TB, Nsabimana D, Uddling J (2015) Photosynthetic temperature responses of tree species in Rwanda: evidence of pronounced negative effects of high temperature in montane rainforest climax species. New Phytol 206:1000–1012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Viau AE, Gajewski K, Sawada MC, Fines P (2006) Millennial-scale temperature variations in North America during the Holocene. J Geophys Res 111:D09102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Voelker SL (2011) Age-dependent changes in environmental influences on tree growth and their implications for forest responses to climate change. In: Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Dawson TE (eds) Size and age-related changes in tree structure and function. Springer, New York, pp 455–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Voelker SL, Muzika R-M, Guyette RP, Stambaugh MC (2006) Historical growth enhancement declines with age in Quercus and Pinus. Ecol Monogr 76:549–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Voelker SL, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Strauss SH (2011) Reduced wood stiffness and strength, and altered stem form, in young antisense 4CL transgenic poplars with reduced lignin contents. New Phytol 189:1096–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Voelker SL, Noirot-Cosson P-E, Stambaugh MC, McMurry ER, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Guyette RP (2012) Spring temperature responses of oaks are synchronous with North Atlantic conditions during the last deglaciation. Ecol Monogr 82:169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Voelker SL, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Brooks JR, Guyette RP (2014) Drivers of radial growth and carbon isotope discrimination of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa Michx) across continental gradients in precipitation, vapour pressure deficit and irradiance. Plant, Cell Environ 37:766–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Voelker SL, Stambaugh MC, Guyette RP, Feng X, Grimley DA, Leavitt SW, Panyushkina I, Grimm EC, Marsicek JP, Shuman B, Curry BB (2015) Deglacial hydroclimate of mid-continental North America. Quat Res 83:336–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Voelker SL, Brooks JR, Meinzer FC, Anderson R, Bader MK-F, Battipaglia G, Becklin KM, Beerling D, Bert D, Betancourt JL, Dawson TE, Domec JC, Guyette RP, Körner C, Leavitt SW, Linder S, Marshall JD, Mildner M, Ogée J, Panyushkina I, Plumpton HJ, Pregitzer KS, Saurer M, Smith AR, Siegwolf RTW, Stambaugh MC, Talhelm AF, Tardif JC, Van de Water PK, Ward JK, Wingate L (2016) A dynamic leaf gas exchange strategy is conserved in woody plants under changing ambient CO2: evidence from carbon isotope discrimination in paleo and CO2 enrichment studies. Glob Change Biol 22:889–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang D, Heckathorn SA, Wang X, Philpott SM (2012a) A meta-analysis of plant physiological and growth responses to temperature and elevated CO2. Oecologia 169:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse DS, Murdock TQ (2012b) ClimateWNA-High-resolution spatial climate data for Western North America. J Appl Meteorol 51:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Way DA, Oren R (2010) Differential responses to changes in growth temperature between trees from different functional groups and biomes: a review and synthesis of data. Tree Physiol 30:669–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Way DA, Oren R, Kroner Y (2015) The space-time continuum: the effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on trees and the importance of scaling. Plant Cell Environ 38:991–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Webb T III, Bryson RA (1972) Late- and postglacial climatic change in the northern Midwest, USA: quantitative estimates derived from fossil pollen spectra by multivariate statistical analysis. Quat Res 2:70–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Environ 5:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Williams JW, Shuman BN, Webb T III, Bartlein PJ, Leduc P (2004) Quaternary vegetation dynamics in North America: scaling from taxa to biomes. Ecol Monogr 74:309–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Williams JW, Shuman B, Bartlein PJ, Diffenbaugh NS, Webb T III (2010) Rapid, time-transgressive, and variable responses to early Holocene midcontinental drying in North America. Geology 38:135–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wright A, Schnitzer S, Reich PB (2015) Daily environmental conditions determine the competition-facilitation balance for plant water status. J Ecol 103:648–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yu Z, Eicher U (1998) Abrupt climate oscillations during the last deglaciation in central North America. Science 282:2235–2238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yu Z, Wright HE Jr (2001) Response of interior North America to abrupt climate oscillations in the North Atlantic region during the last declaciation. Earth-Sci Rev 52:333–369Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven L. Voelker
    • 1
  • Michael C. Stambaugh
    • 2
  • J. Renée Brooks
    • 3
  • Frederick C. Meinzer
    • 4
  • Barbara Lachenbruch
    • 5
  • Richard P. Guyette
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plants, Soils and ClimateUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of ForestryUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL), Western Ecology DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Pacific Northwest Research StationU.S.D.A. Forest ServiceCorvallisUSA
  5. 5.Department of Forest Ecosystems, SocietyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations